$1.2M raised, $1.5M spent, $688.5K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
75% from donors giving over $200 · 22% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Matt A. Epperson, $15K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$1.1M given to candidates and committees, the largest to American Revival ($10K) · 76% of its support to Republicans, 18% to Democrats. See where it goes
“With nearly 150 years of experience, we are well positioned to help fulfill global energy needs. We are a leading integrated downstream energy provider that manufactures, transports and markets products that drive the global economy.”
Phillips 66, the organization this committee is the political fund of, phillips66.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its sponsor’s site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$877K to 136 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $877,000
Republican 76%Democratic 18%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
101
$663,000
$0
$663,000
76%
Democratic
21
$161,000
$0
$161,000
18%
Other or unresolved
14
$53,000
$0
$53,000
6%
Shown support
136
$877,000
$0
$877,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$1,134,500 in 416 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
22
$166K · 15%
Republican candidates
102
$660.5K · 58%
Other or unresolved candidates
16
$63K · 5.6%
Other PACs and committees
35
$245K · 22%
All recipients
175
$1.1M
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Texas
32
$203.5K
California
8
$60K
Louisiana
6
$50K
Oklahoma
7
$47.5K
North Carolina
5
$35K
Ohio
5
$32.5K
Colorado
3
$30K
Montana
4
$27.5K
The largest 8 of 41 states.
Recipients 175
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Kurt Alme2 receipts, latest Jul 31, 2026Alme for Senate · S6MT00295$10K
Mark Robert Warner3 receipts, latest Sep 15, 2026Friends of Mark Warner · S6VA00093$10K
Frank D. Lucas3 receipts, latest Jul 31, 2026Lucas for Congress · H4OK06056$10K
Sylvia R. Garcia3 receipts, latest Sep 15, 2026Sylvia Garcia for Congress · H8TX29052$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
Mullin for AmericaSenate campaign committee · Connected to MULLIN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$5K
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Mark Edward Lashier2 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · PRES & COO · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · THE WOODLANDS, TX$10,000
Kevin J. Mitchell2 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · SENIOR EXECUTIVE · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
Ann Oglesby2 contributions, latest Mar 5, 2026 · RETIRED · PHILLIPS 66 · BARTLESVILLE, OK$10,000
Tandra Coleman Perkins2 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · IT - APPS - APP ENABLEMENT E6 1F · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · KATY, TX$10,000
Vanessa Allen Sutherland10 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · LEGAL - GENERAL · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
Christian Paul Tracy2 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · BD&S MANAGER · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
Graham N. Fisher18 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · BD&S MANAGER · PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY · FULSHEAR, TX$9,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,761 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $935.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$270,30922%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$20,0001.6%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$16,3981.3%
LANKPAC2 payments · latest Feb 25, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$10,000
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$288,09420%
Paid to
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$7,1730.5%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$5,0090.3%
Paid to
Department of the Treasury- IRS Center2 payments · latest Apr 2, 2026 · 45-4531796 TAX PAYMENT 2024; 1120POL$4,208
Oklahoma Tax Commission2 payments · latest Apr 2, 2026 · OK TAX EIN 45-4531796 FOR 2024$801
Total reported disbursements $1,454,776
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,425,430 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,322,04393%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$1,134,500
CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE$181,211
CONTRIBUTION TO STATE COMMITTEE$19,518
UNCASHED 10/16/24 CONTRIBUTION-$176
VOID - UNCASHED 2/3/2026 CONTRIBUTION-$1,501
VOID OF 8/13/2024 CONTRIBUTION-$2,001
UNCASHED 1/23/2026 CONTRIBUTION-$3,004
UNCASHED 10/28/2025 CONTRIBUTION-$6,505
Paid to
Jim Wright for Texas Railroad Commission$12,502
Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund$10,001
Texans for Greg Abbott$10,001
American Revival$10,000
Blue DOG PAC$10,000
Wild & Wonderful PAC$10,000
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$100,551
Spending over time
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $230.5K, September 2026.
$1.5M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$41,501
September 2026$230,522
August 2026$53,523
July 2026$127,508
June 2026$52,003
May 2026$154,138
April 2026$60,433
March 2026$42,501
February 2026$74,503
January 2026$54,518
December 2025$30,500
November 2025$64,500
October 2025$116,723
September 2025$29,004
August 2025$23,500
July 2025$0
June 2025$19,001
May 2025$19,500
April 2025$86,076
March 2025$62,324
February 2025$112,499
January 2025$0
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Besides giving through its PAC, Phillips 66 pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$3.9M
Quarterly reports read
13
Bills it named
31
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Trade (domestic/foreign)in 10 report entries
In its own words
Section 301 Investigation of Chinas Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance;
Issues related to exporting renewable fuels to Europe;
Support for US energy products in US trade agreements;
Support for USMCA;
Executive actions pertaining to Jones Act waivers;
Executive actions relating to fuel price mitigation;
Improvements to African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA);
Issues Related to executive actions to improve the pharmaceutical supply chain;
Executive actions to approve global cargo movements;
Efforts related to executive action on a diesel export ban.
GENERAL LICENSE NO. 129A Authorizing Transactions Involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH;
General advocacy to support market access in Latin America
Improvements to African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA)
Advising and engaging on international and domestic energy developments impacting P66, including energy standards and investments in oil production, trade implications and legislative or regulatory changes.
Policy advocacy to support growth for renewable fuels, security of supply, and impacts of tax and trade actions as well as permitting reform and sustainable tax policy.
Issues related to crude imports.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Energy, Dept of
Intl Trade Administration (ITA)
Treasury, Dept of
Interior, Dept of (DOI)
Commerce, Dept of (DOC)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and 8 more offices
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
White House Office
Agriculture, Dept of (USDA)
Defense, Dept of (DOD)
Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM Bank)
Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS)
State, Dept of (DOS)
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 9 report entries · 9 bills named
In its own words
S. 4588, Taxing Buybacks from Big Oil Windfalls Act;
S. 4111 and H.R. 7960, Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act;
S. 4784, Section 815 - Limitations Relating to Capital Distributions for Defense Contractors;
S. 4212, Prioritizing the Warfighter in Defense Contracting Act of 2026;
IRC code sections 168(k) and 45Z and 45Q;
Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit Guidance;
General education about corporate rate in OBBB;
H.R. 6900, American Affordability Act;
S. 3759, Securing Americas Fuels Act;
H.R. 6518, Securing Americas Fuels Act.
General education about corporate rate in OBBB
Policy advocacy to support growth for renewable fuels, security of supply, and impacts of tax and trade actions as well as permitting reform and sustainable tax policy.
Issues related to tax reform; R&D tax credit and 45Z tax credit; H.R.1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L.119-21) implementation.
IRC code sections 168(k) and 45Z and 45Q; Section 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit Guidance
Advising and engaging on international and domestic energy developments impacting P66, including energy standards and investments in oil production, trade implications and legislative or regulatory changes.
Policy advocacy to support growth for renewable fuels, security of supply, and impacts of tax and trade actions as well as permitting reform and sustainable tax policy.
Issues related to pipeline permitting.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Energy, Dept of
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Interior, Dept of (DOI)
Intl Trade Administration (ITA)
Treasury, Dept of
and 1 more office
Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers)
Environment/Superfundin 7 report entries
In its own words
Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review;
OOOO b/c Reconsideration; *draft* Regulatory improvements to OOOO b/c; *draft* Subpart W Reconsideration;
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems; *draft* legislation to reauthorize TSCA; *draft* regulatory improvements to TSCA;
Air Plan Approval;
Illinois;
Clean Data Determination for the Illinois Portion of the St. Louis Area for the 2015 Ozone Standard.
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems;
Reforms to Toxic Substances Control Act and the nomenclature process;
Clean Data Determination for the Illinois Portion of the St. Louis Area for the 2015 Ozone Standard
OOOO b/c Reconsideration; *draft* Regulatory improvements to OOOO b/c; *draft* Subpart W reconsideration;
Reforms to Toxic Substances Control Act and the nomenclature process
Advising and engaging on international and domestic energy developments impacting P66, including energy standards and investments in oil production, trade implications and legislative or regulatory changes.
Policy advocacy to support growth for renewable fuels, security of supply, and impacts of tax and trade actions as well as permitting reform and sustainable tax policy.
Fuel/Gas/Oilin 7 report entries · 18 bills named
In its own words
H.R. 1346, Nationwide Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice Act of 2025;
H.R. 3109, REFINER Act;
The Agricultural Act of 2026;
Title XII, Miscellaneous, Subtitle E, Sec. 12501, Year-Round E15 and RFS Reform;
Renewable Fuels Standard RVO Annual Rule 2026 and 2027;
FTZ designation application;
Executive actions related to emergency RVP waivers;
Extension of Standard Futures Contracts to 24/7 Trading and Perpetual Contracts Referencing Physically Delivered or Storable Energy Commodities;
S.J.Res. 205 and H.J. Res 214 related to California standards for off road engines;
S.J.Res. 206 and H.J.Res. 211 related to California standards for vehicles;
S.J.Res. 207 and H. J.Res. 205 related to California standards for vehicles;
S.J.Res. 208 and H.J.Res. 212 related to California standards for vehicles;
S.J. Res 209 and H.J. Res 210 related to California standards for at berth vessels;
S.J. Res 210 and H.J.Res. 213 related to California standards for commercial harbor craft.
*draft* legislation supporting year around E15 and Small Refinery Exemption reform;
Advising and engaging on international and domestic energy developments impacting P66, including energy standards and investments in oil production, trade implications and legislative or regulatory changes.
Issues regarding shareholder proposals and proxy advisors.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)
SENATE
White House Office
Defensein 3 report entries
In its own words
Policy advocacy to support growth for renewable fuels, security of supply, and impacts of tax and trade actions as well as permitting reform and sustainable tax policy.
Offices it contacted
Energy, Dept of
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Interior, Dept of (DOI)
Intl Trade Administration (ITA)
SENATE
Treasury, Dept of
Transportationin 3 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
S. 2975, Pipeline Safety Act of 2025;
H.R. 5301, PIPES Act;
S. 4944: American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026 H.R. 3898, the Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today (PERMIT) Act;
H.R. 4776, SPEED Act;
Draft legislation to reauthorize PHMSA; *draft* permitting reform legislation;
Support for proposed infrastructure projects
S. 4944: American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026;
H.R. 3898, the Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today (PERMIT) Act;
S. 565, the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026;
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $130.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
National Republican Senatorial Committee$17.5K
Rep. Mike Haridopolos$10K
Sen. John Kennedy$10K
Aaron Flint$7K
Rep. Kevin Hern$7K
Sen. Bill Hagerty$5K
Sen. Eric Schmitt$4K
Linda Sanchez$3.5K
Rep. Julia Letlow$3.5K
Sen. Jon Husted$3.5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “PHILLIPS 66”, found by searching “PHILLIPS 66”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Phillips 66 PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Phillips 66 as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
$1.1M across 179 recipient committees, or 78% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$10,000
Mark Edward LashierPerson · Pres & COO, Phillips 66 Co. · The Woodlands, TX · 0.8%
$10,000
Kevin J. MitchellPerson · Senior Executive, Phillips 66 Co. · Houston, TX · 0.8%
$10,000
Ann OglesbyPerson · Retired, Phillips 66 · Bartlesville, OK · 0.8%
William L. JohnsonPerson · Midstream ENG - Engineer E3 7E, Phillips 66 Co. · Houston, TX · 0.5%
$6,240
19 smaller sources, $103.5K in all (8.3%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$29,569
New Jersey282 contributions · 2.2%
$20,741
Montana158 contributions · 1.3%
$12,331
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Phillips 66 Company6,747 contributions · 95% of ranked
$883,773
PSX3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$12,500
P66 Retiree3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$10,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$7,500
Board Of Directors1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$5,000
Phillips 66 Headquarters1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$5,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$5,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$5,000
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($270,309) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Engineering Manager340 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$56,226
Engineering Bu/functional Manager130 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$29,793
Engineering Supervisor251 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$29,750
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 9 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$28,000
Operations Supv II339 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$26,188
Senior Executive26 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$26,164
BD&S Manager42 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$25,500
Board Member6 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$25,000
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($270,309) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Texans for Greg Abbott2 payments · latest May 6, 2026 · PRIMARY$20,001
Jim Wright for Texas Railroad Commission4 payments · latest Mar 26, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE$15,003
Texans for Dan Patrick2 payments · latest Sep 14, 2026 · PRIMARY$10,001
Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund2 payments · latest Jul 6, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE$10,001
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$5,0090.4%
Filed as
45-4531796 TAX PAYMENT 2024; 1120POL$2,164
2025 1120POL TAX PAYMENT EIN 45-4531796$2,044
OK TAX EIN 45-4531796 FOR 2024$412
2025 TAX PAYMENT EIN 45-4531796$389
Paid to
Department of the Treasury- IRS Center$4,208
Oklahoma Tax Commission$801
Total itemized disbursements $1,425,430
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 679 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Texans for Greg Abbott2 payments · 1.4% of all spending
$20,001
Jim Wright for Texas Railroad Commission4 payments · 1% of all spending
$15,003
Texans for Dan Patrick2 payments · 0.7% of all spending
$10,001
Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund2 payments · 0.7% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Texans for Greg Abbott2 payments, latest May 6, 2026PRIMARY$20K
Jim Wright for Texas Railroad Commission4 payments, latest Mar 26, 2026CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE$15K
Texans for Dan Patrick2 payments, latest Sep 14, 2026PRIMARY$10K
Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund2 payments, latest Jul 6, 2026CONTRIBUTION TO COMMITTEE$10K
S. 3759 and H.R. 6518, Securing Americas Fuels Act
S. 3759, Security America's Fuels Act;
H.R. 6518, Securing Americas Fuels Act; *draft* legislation supporting year around E15 and Small Refinery Exemption reform;
Extension of Standard Futures Contracts to 24/7 Trading and Perpetual Contracts Referencing Physically Delivered or Storable Energy Commodities
Advising and engaging on international and domestic energy developments impacting P66, including energy standards and investments in oil production, trade implications and legislative or regulatory changes.
Issues related to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency standards. FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (S.2296/P.L.119-60), issues related to liquid fuels.
Issues related to electric vehicles and fuel efficiency standards. Issues related to liquid fuels.