Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
ConstructionBuilding and heavy-construction contractors, engineering and design firms, and their associations. Home builders are under Real estate.BusinessPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)CorporationSacramento, CaliforniaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00337394 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 23 | $51,000 | $0 | $51,000 | 53% |
| Democratic | 10 | $33,000 | $0 | $33,000 | 35% |
| Other or unresolved | 6 | $11,500 | $0 | $11,500 | 12% |
| Shown support | 39 | $95,500 | $0 | $95,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 17 | $52K · 27% |
| Republican candidates | 27 | $63.5K · 33% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 6 | $11.5K · 6% |
| Other PACs and committees | 15 | $63.5K · 33% |
| All recipients | 65 | $190.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 15 | $38K |
| Washington | 5 | $17K |
| Arizona | 2 | $11K |
| Mississippi | 4 | $8.5K |
| North Carolina | 2 | $7.5K |
| Arkansas | 3 | $7.5K |
| Alaska | 2 | $6.5K |
| Missouri | 2 | $5.5K |
The largest 8 of 17 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NAPA-PAC) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL STONE, SAND AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOC. (ARTBA) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,589 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $178.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 2 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1K from 2 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $207,565
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
60% to named individuals, 0.5% to organizations, 40% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40% | $82,526 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 4.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Materials, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 3.1% | $6,500 |
| Person · Project Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 2.2% | $4,500 |
| Person · Chief Accounting Officer, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 2.2% | $4,500 |
| Person · Senior Vice President Group Operation, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 2% | $4,200 |
| Person · Project Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 2% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,552 contributions · 97% | $173,728 |
| 6 contributions · 1.7% | $3,000 |
| 30 contributions · 0.6% | $1,095 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $1,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,581 contributions · 98% of ranked | $175,723 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $219,475
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $201,975
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$219.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $70.7K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 5 payments totaling $10K.
Besides giving through its PAC, Granite Construction Incorporated pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $5.9K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED”, found by searching “GRANITE CONSTRUCTION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Granite Construction Inc. Employee PAC - Granitepac is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NRCC ARIZONA VICTORY · 5 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BOLD FRONTLINE DEMOCRATS · 5 payments | $8.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WICKER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ROUZER CONGRESSIONAL TRUST · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CBCPAC-NEWDEM FUND FOR THE MAJORITY · 4 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to SULLIVAN VICTORY · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BERA VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
$189.5K across 60 recipient committees, or 86% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $4,075 |
| Person · Vice President & Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.8% | $3,700 |
| Person · Area Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.5% | $3,150 |
| Person · Director of Operation Finance Constru, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.4% | $3,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · President, Lehman-Roberts Co. & Memphis Stone · Memphis, TN · 1.4% | $3,000 |
| Person · Regional Vice President, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.4% | $2,850 |
| Person · District Sales Director, PNW & Deser, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.4% | $2,850 |
| Person · Operations Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.4% | $2,825 |
| Person · Senior Vice President & General Counse, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.3% | $2,700 |
| Person · Chief Information Officer, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.3% | $2,700 |
| Person · Vice President and Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.2% | $2,415 |
| Person · Branch Division Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.2% | $2,400 |
| Person · Manager of Construction Materials, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1.1% | $2,315 |
| Person · Vice President, Finance, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Employee Development, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Regional Controller, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Employee Development, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Vice President of Diversity and Inclus, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Senior Director of Operational Finance, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Group Operation, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,150 |
| Person · Business Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 1% | $2,000 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Human Resources, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.9% | $1,950 |
| Person · Director, Human Resources, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.9% | $1,935 |
| Person · Plants Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.9% | $1,800 |
| Person · Project Manager/senior Estimator, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.9% | $1,800 |
| Person · Chief Estimator, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,750 |
| Person · Vice President & Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Vice President, Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Vice President, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Assistant Plants Mananger, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Vice President of Risk Management, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Group Operation, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,720 |
| Person · Senior Project Controls Engineer, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,680 |
| Person · Regional Environmental Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,650 |
| Person · Chief Estimator, Granite Construction · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,600 |
| Person · Vice President and Southeast Region MA, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,585 |
| Person · Regional Plants Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.8% | $1,575 |
| Person · Group Continuous Improvement Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,525 |
| Person · Chief Estimator, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,500 |
| Person · Project Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,500 |
| Person · Chief Estimator, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,500 |
| Person · Business Development Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,500 |
| Person · Vice President & Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,400 |
| Person · Branch Division Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.7% | $1,360 |
| Person · Vice President & Regional Manager, Granite Construction, Inc. · Watsonville, CA · 0.6% | $1,250 |
2 smaller sources, $1.1K in all (0.5%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| 6 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $3,000 |
A further $100 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($25,314) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 246 contributions · 8% of ranked | $14,325 |
| 216 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $11,510 |
| 19 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 131 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $8,070 |
| 169 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $7,295 |
| 47 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $6,500 |
| 122 contributions · 3% of ranked | $5,334 |
| 45 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $4,500 |
A further $100 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($25,314) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
All 107 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 5 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 5 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $8,500 |
| 2 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $7,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.