Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Environment & climateGroups that state an environmental or climate purpose, such as the political arm of the League of Conservation Voters.CausesPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACMembership organizationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: League of Conservation Voters, Inc
Political fund of League of Conservation Voters, Inc
League of Conservation Voters electoral fund (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00252940 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $22,273 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 295 | $542.1K · 91% |
| Republican candidates | 1 | $75 · <0.1% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 13 | $12.5K · 2.1% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $1K · 0.2% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $6.1K · 1% |
| Other PACs and committees | 48 | $33.8K · 5.7% |
| All recipients | 362 | $595.6K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 38 | $57.6K |
| New York | 22 | $44.7K |
| Michigan | 22 | $32.8K |
| Virginia | 13 | $29.9K |
| Pennsylvania | 12 | $26.7K |
| Illinois | 14 | $26K |
| Iowa | 7 | $24.6K |
| Arizona | 10 | $24.1K |
The largest 8 of 45 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WOMEN VOTE · 1 payment | $10K |
$10K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 6 payments | $8K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 8 payments | $7.1K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 488 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $592K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $733,068
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
49% to named individuals, 0.9% to organizations, 50% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 50% | $366,472 |
| Person · Quality Engineer, Clear Ballot Group · Brighton, MA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Professor, Berklee College of Music · Brighton, MA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Activist, Self-Employed · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Engineer, MKA · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Real Estate, Lehbros, Ltd · San Diego, CA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · San Diego, CA · 1.4% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 52 contributions · 23% | $134,115 |
| 87 contributions · 19% | $113,540 |
| 34 contributions · 9.7% | $57,250 |
| 21 contributions · 9% | $52,891 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $686,711
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
The $22,273 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$686.7K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $109.3K, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 15 payments totaling $6.3K.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2006 cycleReport released May 27, 2009
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 1, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
League of Conservation Voters electoral fund Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
No pages quoted
League of Conservation Voters Action Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $6.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| House campaign committee · Connected to STELSON VICTORY FUND · 5 payments |
| $7K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 7 payments | $6.9K |
| House campaign committee · 7 payments | $6.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JEFFRIES BATTLEGROUND PROTECTION FUND · 7 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 5 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 7 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEM RISING 2026 · 4 payments | $6K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $5.6K |
| Senate campaign committee · 4 payments | $5.6K |
$595.6K across 325 recipient committees, or 87% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Arlington, VA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Writer/investor, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Real Estate, Fred F. French Co. · New York, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Engineer, Weavegrid · Cupertino, CA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Landlord, Self-Employed · Sag Harbor, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Rye, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Not-Employed · Lafayette, CA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investment Manager, Edgestream Partners, LP · Lafayette, CA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Minneapolis, MN · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · NON-Profit Sector, Self-Employed · Bentonville, AR · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed · Bentonville, AR · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Sarasota, FL · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Engineer, TE Connectivity · Vernon Hills, IL · 1.1% | $8,002 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 1% | $7,000 |
| Organization · 0.9% | $6,594 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Cumberland Foreside, ME · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Stockbridge, MA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Market Research, RRC Associates · Boulder, CO · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Executive, Sierra Club · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Wayland, MA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Volunteer and Board Member, Massenergize · Wayland, MA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Port Angeles, WA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Artist, Self-Employed · Santa Fe, NM · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Boston, MA · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Company President, CDI Meters, Inc · Silver Spring, MD · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Renewable Energy, Derosa Advisors · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Ketchum, ID · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Ketchum, ID · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Hanover, NH · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Investment Manager, The Pritzker Organization · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Investment Manager, The Pritzker Organization · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Consultant, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Environmentalist, Self-Employed · Pacific Palisades, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Not-Employed · Boulder, UT · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · Boulder, UT · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Not-Employed · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · St Petersburg, FL · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired, Not-Employed · New York, NY · 0.7% | $5,000 |
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| 15 contributions · 5.9% |
| $34,675 |
| 6 contributions · 4.3% | $25,400 |
| 22 contributions · 2.9% | $16,850 |
| 3 contributions · 2.5% | $15,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 278 contributions · 53% of ranked | $312,756 |
| Written instead of an employer · 37 contributions · 18% of ranked | $106,228 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $2,175 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($100,897) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 271 contributions · 50% of ranked | $291,156 |
| 6 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $25,002 |
| 4 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 4 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $20,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $19,800 |
| 28 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,820 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $2,175 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($100,897) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $660,467
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,737 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $13,442 |
| 418 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $9,626 |
| 6 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $8,000 |
| 4 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $7,500 |
| 8 payments · 1% of all spending | $7,050 |
| 5 payments · 1% of all spending | $6,950 |
| 7 payments · 1% of all spending | $6,940 |
| 7 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $6,490 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.