Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Pro-IsraelGroups that state a pro-Israel purpose, and the groups AIPAC’s network funds or runs, such as United Democracy Project. Placed by their own words, a stated tie to that network, or their main funder.Causes › Foreign policy & securityPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyActive
FKA North Jersey PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00247403 · files monthly
“NORPAC is a bi-partisan Political Action Committee (PAC) whose primary purpose is to support candidates and sitting members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives who demonstrate a genuine commitment to the strength, security, and survival of Israel.”
NORPAC, on its own site, norpac.net
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 17 | $164,700 | $0 | $164,700 | 56% |
| Other or unresolved | 6 | $69,400 | $0 | $69,400 | 23% |
| Democratic | 8 | $62,500 | $0 | $62,500 | 21% |
| Shown support | 31 | $296,600 | $0 | $296,600 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $2,011,571 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 9 | $69.5K · 10% |
| Republican candidates | 18 | $169.7K · 25% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 6 | $69.4K · 10% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $10K · 1.5% |
| Other PACs and committees | 17 | $365.6K · 53% |
| All recipients | 51 | $684.2K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 2 | $47K |
| Kansas | 2 | $31.5K |
| Florida | 2 | $27.2K |
| South Carolina | 1 | $26.8K |
| California | 2 | $23K |
| New York | 3 | $21.5K |
| Indiana | 1 | $20.6K |
| New Hampshire | 1 | $19.5K |
The largest 8 of 21 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $121.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $65.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $31.2K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $27.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GREAT EIGHT COMMITTEE · 5 payments |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,166 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $3,208,991
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
60% to named individuals, 0.5% to organizations, 40% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40% | $1,273,654 |
| Person · MD, Self · Englewood, NJ · 10% | $332,964 |
| Person · Real Estate, Atlantic Realty · New York, NY · 4.6% | $146,500 |
| Person · MD, Self · Englewood, NJ · 3.2% | $103,500 |
| Person · WEB Developer, Simons Foundation · Setauket, NY · 3.1% | $100,000 |
| Person · CEO, IDT · Bronx, NY · 2.6% | $83,500 |
| Person · Attorney, J.P. Morgan Chase · Teaneck, NJ · 2.5% | $80,525 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,169 contributions · 46% | $1,407,172 |
| 897 contributions · 43% | $1,294,189 |
| 40 contributions · 4.4% | $132,800 |
| 4 contributions · 2.6% | $79,800 |
| 46 contributions · 2.3% | $70,740 |
| 5 contributions · 1% | $30,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $3,154,002
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
The $2,011,571 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$3.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $359.4K, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2010$990 assessed
Case 2280 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
FKA North Jersey PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
NORPAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $121.8K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $27.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to GRAHAM MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $26.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $25K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 2 payments | $24.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $21.6K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to BANKS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $20.6K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20.3K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM ROGERS · 4 payments | $19.6K |
$684.2K across 49 recipient committees, or 22% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Person · CEO & President, Berexco · Wichita, KS · 2.5% | $79,800 |
| Person · Mortgage Broker, FCMC Mortgage Corp · Lawrence, NY · 2% | $63,500 |
| Person · Housewife · Bronx, NY · 1.9% | $62,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · President, Diamond Chemical Co. · Cresskill, NJ · 1.5% | $49,000 |
| Person · Chairman & CEO, United Retail Group, Inc. · Englewood, NJ · 1.4% | $45,000 |
| Person · Investment Banker, Hambro America Inc. · Teaneck, NJ · 1.4% | $44,570 |
| Person · Venture Capital, Blumberg Capital · San Francisco, CA · 1.4% | $43,500 |
| Person · Attorney, Self · Lawrence, NY · 1.2% | $39,824 |
| Person · Homemaker, Self · New York, NY · 1.2% | $39,500 |
| Person · MD, Columbia Presbyterian · Englewood, NJ · 1% | $32,795 |
| Person · INV, Self · Closter, NJ · 1% | $32,600 |
| Person · Real Estate, Self · New York, NY · 0.9% | $28,250 |
| Person · Owner, Alevy & Associates · Long Beach, CA · 0.8% | $26,000 |
| Person · Senior VP, Argus · Bronx, NY · 0.8% | $25,385 |
| Person · Real Estate, KEY Properties · Teaneck, NJ · 0.8% | $24,330 |
| Person · Real Estate, Rosen Partners · New York, NY · 0.7% | $24,050 |
| Person · Trader, Self · Lawrence, NY · 0.7% | $22,700 |
| Person · Executive, Multicare Management · Englewood Cliffs, NJ · 0.6% | $20,500 |
| Person · Banker, JP Morgan · Forest Hills, NY · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Real Estate Developer, Muss Development Corp · New York, NY · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Real Estate, Self · Lawrence, NY · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · INV, Self · Long Beach, CA · 0.6% | $19,000 |
| Person · CFO, IDT, Inc. · Englewood, NJ · 0.6% | $18,400 |
| Person · Attorney, Self · New York, NY · 0.6% | $18,050 |
| Person · Teacher, Drisha Institute · Teaneck, NJ · 0.6% | $18,000 |
| Organization · 0.5% | $16,614 |
| Person · Architect and Exec, Artimus Construction · Lawrence, NY · 0.5% | $16,500 |
18 smaller sources, $218.5K in all (6.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $15,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.1% | $3,750 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 806 contributions · 43% of ranked | $1,183,044 |
| 35 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $150,000 |
| 23 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $102,750 |
| 4 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 29 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $80,525 |
| 4 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $79,800 |
| 9 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $63,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 75 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $58,165 |
A further $147,108 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 170 contributions · 17% of ranked | $513,159 |
| 180 contributions · 11% of ranked | $340,121 |
| 236 contributions · 8.4% of ranked | $249,972 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 97 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $204,345 |
| 107 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $157,680 |
| 41 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $131,845 |
| 4 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 144 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $90,495 |
A further $38,658 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $1,122,985
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 346 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $144,760 |
| 3 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $121,800 |
| 45 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $89,104 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $65,700 |
| 19 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $51,798 |
| 50 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $38,563 |
| 3 payments · 1% of all spending | $31,200 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $27,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.