Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › South Carolina U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. SenateSouth CarolinaDied July 11, 2026
Served in Congress 1995–2026
Lindsey Graham’s words are not shown
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Graham’s 103 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00458828
$3.22 has been spent for every dollar raised across 8 reports ($22.2M of $6.9M). Cash on hand went from $15.9M on Mar 31, 2025 to $314.9K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,131,308 | $843,569 | $15,911,355 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,489,357 | $1,783,922 | $15,616,791 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,384,195 | $2,492,053 | $14,508,933 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $874,060 | $1,975,255 | $13,407,737 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,049,703 | $2,843,831 | $11,613,609 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 20, 2026 | $228,519 | $7,614,358 | $4,227,769 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $609,016 | $2,526,985 | $2,309,800 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $124,801 | $2,119,721 | $314,880 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 263,895 votes (57%) · 1 of 6 · Full results ↗
Darline Graham is on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot instead
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary June 9, 2026 · 3 polls
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Lindsey Graham won by 27.9 points. The 2 final polls had a median of Lindsey Graham +20.2, understating Lindsey Graham's margin by 7.7 points.
| Poll | Lindsey Graham | Mark Lynch | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| InsiderAdvantageended Jun 6 | 51.2% | 20.9% | Lindsey Graham +30.3 | +2.4 |
| The Citadel Pollended May 31 | 46% | 36% | Lindsey Graham +10 | −17.9 |
| Median of the final polls | Lindsey Graham +20.2 | −7.7 | ||
| Result | 56.8% | 28.9% | Lindsey Graham +27.9 |
June 9, 2026 · Result (unofficial) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 21 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 8 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 49 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $3.9M.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,147 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 310 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $6,890,958
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
22% of the money placed by state came from inside South Carolina: $272K of $1.3M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 412 contributions · 22% | $272,036 |
| 187 contributions · 15% | $185,821 |
| 403 contributions · 12% | $146,892 |
| 159 contributions · 9.4% | $119,184 |
| 284 contributions · 8% | $100,401 |
| 87 contributions · 5.3% | $66,593 |
| 167 contributions · 4.7% | $59,674 |
| 18 contributions · 3.3% | $41,566 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 49 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,987 contributions · 20% of ranked | $217,536 |
| Written instead of an employer · 158 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $82,433 |
| Written instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $26,175 |
| 34 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $24,750 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1% of ranked | $11,400 |
A further $17,481 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($68,562) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Graham’s campaign or spending on ads about Graham are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 32% to named individuals, 43% to organizations, 17% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.7% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 6.7% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind SLF PAC and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $4.2M |
| Organization · behind Palmetto Action | $3.8M |
| Organization · behind Security IS Strength PAC and Project 2026 | $3.4M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind SLF PAC | $3.3M |
| Organization · behind Security IS Strength PAC and Project 2026 | $3.2M |
| Person · Attorney, Pajcic & Pajcic · behind New Deal for All, Inc. | $2.5M |
| Organization · behind Government That Works PAC and Blackpac | $2.3M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Blackpac and Winsenate | $2.1M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Government That Works PAC and Blackpac and 1 more | $2.1M |
| Organization · behind Government That Works PAC and The Edge Action Fund and 1 more | $1.7M |
| Person · Physician, Adelson Drug Clinic · behind Security IS Strength PAC and SLF PAC and 3 more | $1.7M |
| Organization · behind Fresh Start SC PAC | $1.6M |
Read for the 19 largest groups of 53, 92% of the $69.7M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $19,100 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $22,177,274
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 1,489 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
81 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $422,789 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 payments · 44% of all spending | $9,843,508 |
| 38 payments · 19% of all spending | $4,264,075 |
| 5 payments · 7% of all spending | $1,559,000 |
| 28 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $1,316,582 |
| 21 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $416,490 |
| 9 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $409,961 |
| 4 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $408,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $330,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,983 contributions · 17% of ranked | $217,246 |
| 79 contributions · 9.6% of ranked | $119,600 |
| 22 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $65,683 |
| 71 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $60,916 |
| 27 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $40,198 |
| 30 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $38,516 |
| 17 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $33,535 |
| 6 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $28,700 |
A further $15,981 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($68,562) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.