Drug makers & biotechDrug and biotech companies, with their PACs and trade groups. Pharmacies and distributors are under Other health companies.Business › HealthPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationAbbott Park, IllinoisActive
$1.8M raised, $2M spent, $48.7K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
58% from donors giving over $200 · 42% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Thomas R. Stanis, $10K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$1.3M given to candidates and committees, the largest to NRSC ($30K) · 52% of its support to Republicans, 42% to Democrats. See where it goes
Lobbying
Abbott Laboratories lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its sponsor's words
“Our mission is to help people live fuller lives through better health as we deliver innovative solutions across the entire healthcare spectrum. This dedication to innovation is reflected in our leadership, in our consistent investment in research and development, and in our commitment to providing access to our life-changing technologies worldwide.”
Abbott Laboratories, the organization this committee is the political fund of, abbott.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its sponsor’s site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$664.5K to 106 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $664,500
Republican 52%Democratic 42%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
55
$343,500
$0
$343,500
52%
Democratic
41
$281,000
$0
$281,000
42%
Other or unresolved
10
$40,000
$0
$40,000
6%
Shown support
106
$664,500
$0
$664,500
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$1,302,000 in 387 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
41
$281K · 22%
Republican candidates
53
$333.5K · 26%
Other or unresolved candidates
12
$50K · 3.8%
Republican party committees
1
$2.5K · 0.2%
Other party committees
4
$120K · 9.2%
Other PACs and committees
76
$517.5K · 40%
All recipients
187
$1.3M
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
16
$111.5K
Ohio
6
$50K
Louisiana
6
$41K
Illinois
5
$36.5K
Florida
6
$33.5K
Massachusetts
4
$30.5K
Texas
5
$30K
North Carolina
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,767,752 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,028,33058%
Largest donors
Thomas R. Stanis26 contributions, latest Jul 1, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT, CORE LABORATORY DIAGNO · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$9,984
Mary Kay Moreland40 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · EVP HUMAN RESOURCES · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,923
Lisa Earnhardt44 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND GROUP PRE · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,449
Daniel Gesua Sive Salvadori44 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · EVP AND GROUP PRESIDENT, ESTABLISHED P · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,449
Eric Shroff44 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, RAPID AND MOLEC · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,449
Uri Yaron44 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, ELECTROPHYSIOLO · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,449
Michaela Pardubicka-Jenkins44 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT, PEDIATRIC NUTRITION · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$8,141
Elizabeth Mary Balthrop41 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · VP, TRANSFUSION MEDICINE · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$7,872
Philip P. Boudreau41 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$7,872
Melissa D. Brotz41 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLIC AFFAIRS · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$7,872
Christopher J. Calamari41 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, U.S NUTRITION · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$7,872
Keith R. Cienkus41 contributions, latest Aug 27, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT, NUTRITION, SUPPLY CHAI · ABBOTT · ABBOTT PARK, IL$7,872
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 19,493 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$734,42242%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$5,0000.3%
Total reported receipts $1,767,752
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,023,174 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $40.9K
$40.9K+
$163.7K+
$368.3K+
$654.8K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Illinois19,493 contributions · 100%
$1,023,174
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Abbott19,493 contributions · 100% of ranked
$1,023,174
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($734,422) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Vice President Core Laboratory Diagno
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,951,603 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$1,307,00067%
Paid to
NRSC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
NRCC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
DCCC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
DSCC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$639,25033%
Paid to
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$5,0090.3%
Paid to
Bank of America21 payments · latest Sep 15, 2026 · BANK FEES$5,009
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$344<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,951,603
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the earmarked money was headed $250 named
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
$250 across 1 receipt that named a destination, out of the 19,493 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
What the payments were for $1,946,259 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,959,50099.8%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$1,302,000
NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$657,500
Paid to
LGBT Caucus Leadership Fund$30,000
NRSC$30,000
NRCC$30,000
DCCC$30,000
DSCC$30,000
California Democratic Party$26,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$4,7190.2%
Filed as
BANK FEES$4,719
Paid to
Bank of America$4,719
Total itemized disbursements $1,946,259
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 847 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Spending over time
$2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $314.4K, March 2025.
$2M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$90,500
September 2026$208,849
August 2026$360
July 2026$424
June 2026$267,595
May 2026$378
April 2026$290
March 2026$293,322
February 2026$314
January 2026$215
December 2025$274,453
November 2025$192
October 2025$142
September 2025$229,169
August 2025$196
July 2025$142
June 2025$269,927
May 2025$208
April 2025$110
March 2025$314,420
February 2025$193
January 2025$204
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
100 ABBOTT PARK RD.D315 AP6D-2ABBOTT PARK, IL, 60064-6028
Audits and penalties
None published by the FEC
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
What Abbott Laboratories lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Abbott Laboratories pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$3.9M
Quarterly reports read
35
Bills it named
18
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Health Issuesin 15 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
S.2426/H.R.3164 Equitable Community Access to Pharmacist Services Act.
S.4118/H.R.7966 The Hospice Care Accountability, Reform and Enforcement Act of 2026.
Proposals related to the advancement, testing and detection of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).
Proposals related to Department of Defense coverage of continuous glucose monitors.
Proposals related to digital health technologies and innovations.
Proposals related to medical device cybersecurity.
Proposals related to colorectal cancer screening.
Proposals to support updates to the Veteran colorectal cancer screening directive.
Proposals regarding the creation of quality measures for colorectal cancer screening.
H.R. 7118 The Genomic Answers for Children's Health Act.
Proposals related to the coverage of continuous glucose monitors in TRICARE.
Proposals to support colorectal screening coverage for veterans.
Proposals related to the use of diagnostic tests in CLIA-waived settings.
Proposals related to VA coverage of continuous glucose monitors.
Issues related to infant formula access.
Issues related to DMEPOS reimbursement by CMS.
H.R.2300 - To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and for other purposes.
Issues related to infant formula access. H.R.2300 - To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and for other purposes.
Issues related to medical device reimbursement, cybersecurity, and supply chains. Issues related to diagnostic testing.
Medicare/Medicaidin 10 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
S. 2761/H.R. 5269 The Reforming and Enhancing Sustainable Updates to Laboratory Testing Services (RESULTS) Act.
Proposals regarding PAMA regulations and changes to modernize and update the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule.
Proposals related to Medicare coverage of continuous glucose monitors.
Proposals related to the implementation of the Medical Device User Fee Amendments.
Proposals related to coverage for rare disease testing.
Proposals related to the National Coverage Determination for colorectal cancer screening.
Proposals related to the competitive bidding process.
Proposals related to The RAPID (Regulatory Alignment for Predictable and Immediate Device) coverage pathway initiative for eligible Breakthrough Medical Devices.
Proposals related to Medicare coverage of continuous glucose monitors. Issues related to cancer diagnostics national coverage determination.
Issues related to health care, Medicare, medical devices, cancer screening
Issues related to infant formula, including H.R. 2300 - To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and S.4940 - Specialized Infant Formula Act.
H.R. 2300 To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and for other purposes. Proposals related to access to infant formula.
Issues related to infant formula, including H.R. 2300 - To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula.
Proposals related to the Agriculture and Nutrition Act.
Proposals related to U.S. global health programs and pandemic preparedness. Proposals to advance global virus surveillance.
Proposals related to U.S. global health programs and pandemic preparedness.
Proposals related to tariffs on products imported into the United States.
Issues related to trade and supply chains.
Issues related to Japan operations.
Offices it contacted
SENATE
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
Commerce, Dept of (DOC)
State, Dept of (DOS)
Treasury, Dept of
White House Office
Budget/Appropriationsin 6 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to global health policy and funding;
Issues related to H.R. 8595 - National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027;
Issues pertaining to third party litigation funding;
Issues pertaining to H.R. 8845 - Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Appropriations Act.
Issues related to global health policy and funding; Issues related to H.R. 8595 - National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027.
S.2003 The Strengthening Benefit Plans Act of 2025. S.4784 The National Defense Authorization Act of 2027. Proposals related to pension premiums and employee benefits.
Issues related to global health policy and funding; Issues related to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (PL 119-75).
Proposals related to pension premiums and employee benefits.
S.2003 The Strengthening Benefit Plans Act of 2025.
Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.)in 6 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
S.3387 - Ensuring Safe and Toxic-Free Foods Act of 2023.
H.R.2300 To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and for other purposes.
H.R.9817 Toxic Free Food Act of 2024.
H.R.4958 The Grocery Reform and Safety (GRAS) Act.
Proposals related to infant formula ingredients.
Proposals related to access to infant formula.
Proposals related to oral nutrition supplements usage in hospital care settings.
Initiatives to support patient access to therapeutic nutrition.
Proposals regarding the implementation and modernization of the WIC program.
S. 3387 - Ensuring Safe and Toxic-Free Foods Act of 2023. H.R. 9817 Toxic Free Food Act of 2024. H.R. 4958 The Grocery Reform and Safety (GRAS) Act. Proposals related to heavy metals in food.
Issues related to the supply of infant formula and nutrition.
Duddington Global Strategies LLCLobbying firm · 2 reports$10K
Federal Health Policy StrategiesLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
Mayer Brown LLPLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
The Duberstein Group Inc.Lobbying firm · 2 reportsNot reported
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $48.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Sen. John Barrasso$7K
National Republican Senatorial Committee$6.3K
Cong. Ashley Hinson$6K
Congressman French Hill$5K
Sen. Mike Rounds$5K
Sen. Ted Budd$5K
Sen. Jim Banks$3K
Mike Rogers$2K
Sen. Bill Hagerty$2K
Senator Susan Collins$2K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “ABBOTT LABORATORIES”, found by searching “ABBOTT LABORATORIES”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 5, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Abbott Laboratories Employee PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Abbott Laboratories as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Abbott Laboratories Employee PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Exact FEC committee ID in LittleSis
Match confidence
high
Source coverage
Official pages captured
20
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee, Other Campaign Committee
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Norma Torres5 receipts, latest Sep 21, 2026Norma Torres for Congress · H4CA35031$10K
Juan Ciscomani3 receipts, latest Oct 13, 2026Ciscomani for Congress · H2AZ02360$10K
Kevin Mullin4 receipts, latest Oct 13, 2026Kevin Mullin for Congress · H2CA14162$10K
William Troy Balderson2 receipts, latest Mar 30, 2026Balderson for Congress · H8OH12180$10K
Jason T. Smith2 receipts, latest Sep 21, 2026Jason Smith for Congress · H4MO08162$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Committees this one funds
Name
Amount
NRSCParty committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments
$1.3M across 187 recipient committees, or 67% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
26 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$9,984
EVP Human Resources43 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$9,581
Chairman Of The Board And Chief Execut44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
EVP And Group President Established P44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
Executive Vice President And Group PRE44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
Executive Vice President Core Diagnos44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
Executive Vice President Diabetes CAR44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
Executive Vice President Finance And44 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$8,449
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($734,422) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
LGBT Caucus Leadership Fund2 payments · latest Oct 13, 2026 · NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$30,000
California Democratic Party2 payments · latest Jun 1, 2026 · NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$26,000
Friends of Don Harmon2 payments · latest Jun 18, 2026 · NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$18,000
Republican State Leadership Committee1 payment · latest Dec 3, 2025 · NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$17,500
Californians for Jobs & a Strong Economy1 payment · latest Dec 3, 2025 · NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$15,000
California Democratic Party2 payments · 1.3% of all spending
$26,000
Friends of Don Harmon2 payments · 0.9% of all spending
$18,000
Republican State Leadership Committee1 payment · 0.9% of all spending
$17,500
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
LGBT Caucus Leadership Fund2 payments, latest Oct 13, 2026NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$30K
California Democratic Party2 payments, latest Jun 1, 2026NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$26K
Friends of Don Harmon2 payments, latest Jun 18, 2026NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$18K
Republican State Leadership Committee1 payment, latest Dec 3, 2025NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$17.5K
Californians for Jobs & a Strong Economy1 payment, latest Dec 3, 2025NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$15K
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 439 payments totaling $639.3K.