Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Louisiana U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. SenateLouisiana
Senator since 2015
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Bill Cassidy’s words are not shown
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 24 times in the 119th Congress.
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Chairman
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Cassidy’s 277 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00543983
$1.80 has been spent for every dollar raised across 8 reports ($12.6M of $7M). Cash on hand went from $7.5M on Mar 31, 2025 to $685.2K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,047,571 | $143,322 | $7,484,668 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,641,813 | $387,158 | $8,739,323 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,371,066 | $605,040 | $9,505,350 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,071,131 | $471,962 | $10,104,519 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,376,124 | $4,352,107 | $7,128,537 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 26, 2026 | $220,250 | $1,832,118 | $5,516,669 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $272,123 | $961,458 | $4,827,334 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $0 | $3,843,180 | $685,196 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 37 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $2.4M.
Not read yet
Lost · 99,479 votes (25%) · 3 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary May 16, 2026 · runoff June 27, 2026 · 10 polls
Julia Letlow leads John Fleming by 14.5 points · average gap, 3 latest nonpartisan polls · 2 far-off polls left out
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Julia Letlow and John Fleming advanced. The 2 final polls had a median of Julia Letlow +5.3, understating Julia Letlow's margin by 11.3 points.
| Poll | Julia Letlow | John Fleming | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantus Insightsended May 7 | 41.6% | 29.6% | Julia Letlow +12 | −4.6 |
| Emerson Collegeended Apr 26 | 26.9% | 28.3% | John Fleming +1.4 | −18 |
| Median of the final polls | Julia Letlow +5.3 | −11.3 | ||
| Result | 44.8% | 28.3% | Julia Letlow +16.6 |
May 16, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 98% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Julia Letlow won by 13.7 points. The final poll had Julia Letlow +2.8, understating Julia Letlow's margin by 10.9 points.
| Poll | Julia Letlow | John Fleming | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantus Insightsended Jun 24 | 48.1% | 45.3% | Julia Letlow +2.8 | −10.9 |
| Median of the final polls | Julia Letlow +2.8 | −10.9 | ||
| Result | 56.9% | 43.1% | Julia Letlow +13.7 |
June 27, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 99% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote and after the first round, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 24 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,397 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 766 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $6,701,121
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
10% of the money placed by state came from inside Louisiana: $223.3K of $2.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 180 contributions · 15% | $337,364 |
| 255 contributions · 12% | $253,163 |
| 457 contributions · 10% | $223,323 |
| 219 contributions · 9.4% | $207,190 |
| 153 contributions · 6.1% | $132,813 |
| 161 contributions · 5.8% | $126,584 |
| 91 contributions · 4.6% | $100,090 |
| 61 contributions · 3.7% | $81,735 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 45 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 861 contributions · 24% of ranked | $434,407 |
| Written instead of an employer · 248 contributions · 13% of ranked | $235,480 |
| Written instead of an employer · 20 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $68,543 |
| 6 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $33,000 |
| 15 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $32,500 |
| 25 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $28,500 |
| 12 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $21,000 |
A further $91,755 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($51,535) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Cassidy’s campaign or spending on ads about Cassidy are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 31% to named individuals, 47% to organizations, 3.6% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 17% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $4.1M |
| Organization · behind Accountability Project Inc | $1.1M |
| Organization · behind Clearpath Action Fund, Inc. | $597.7K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Accountability Project Inc | $533K |
| Organization · behind Save American Freedom | $485.2K |
| Organization · behind Accountability Project Inc | $475.4K |
| Organization · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $460.7K |
| Person · Executive, Hudson River Trading LLC · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $429.3K |
| Person · Philanthropist, Self Employed · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $429.3K |
| Person · Banker, Arvest Bank · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $429.3K |
| Person · Retired · behind Louisiana Freedom Fund | $429.3K |
| Organization · behind Accountability Project Inc | $426.4K |
Read for the 18 largest groups of 20, 97% of the $27.1M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $2,806,758 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $10,816,839
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 1,508 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
78 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $418,266 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 30 payments · 44% of all spending | $5,484,843 |
| 2 payments · 8.4% of all spending | $1,054,211 |
| 40 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $809,038 |
| 52 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $436,577 |
| 6 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $328,000 |
| 14 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $295,739 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $112,100 |
| 15 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $99,070 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not counted in the lead. This poll has Letlow +2.8, 9.2 points from the median of the race's latest nonpartisan polls (Letlow +12); a poll more than 8 points from it is left out.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 861 contributions · 20% of ranked | $428,303 |
| 95 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $165,946 |
| 103 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $130,145 |
| 158 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $90,009 |
| 53 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $80,371 |
| 48 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $78,002 |
| 52 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $68,666 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 20 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $68,543 |
A further $91,280 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($51,535) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.