Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WV-01 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, WV-01
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from vincegeorgeforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Making life affordable for working West Virginians is my top priority.
I support fully funding SNAP, Social Security, and veterans’ benefits,
and I oppose harmful funding cuts to safety net programs.
West Virginians also deserve to earn higher wages for their
hard work. Our state minimum wage is still $8.75 an hour,
less than half of what you need to survive. If elected, I will fight
to double the federal minimum wage.
I’ll also fight for legislation to help more West Virginians
enter the workforce. Many people want to work, but they can’t
afford childcare or access the transportation they need
to work regularly. I’ll fight to make childcare more affordable
and strengthen rural public transit systems.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
Seven hospitals in our district are likely to close because of disastrous Medicaid funding cuts. This will take away good jobs from working families, hurt our local economies, and negatively impact the health of our already struggling communities. I will fight to reverse harmful cuts to Medicaid and Medicare.
I’ll also work to reduce the cost of health insurance, so no West Virginian goes bankrupt getting the care they need.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
I’m pro-worker and pro-miner, but I’m also firmly anti-exploitation. Coal companies shouldn’t get to turn our drinking water brown and walk away with little to no consequences. I’ll fight for policies that increase mine safety, support miners with black lung, and hold powerful coal companies accountable for the harm they do to working class West Virginians.
The growth of data centers also presents significant concerns for our state. I'll fight for federal policies that hold data centers accountable for their environmental impacts, and I'll make sure local communities have the final say on whether a data center moves in next door.
I also believe in a free market that allows renewable energy to expand in West Virginia if that’s what businesses want to do. This would create more jobs and lower electrical costs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
I am passionate about getting folks registered to vote, expanding voter turnout, and helping voters make informed decisions. Regardless of whether people vote for me, I want to help more West Virginians become civically engaged!
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
U.S. military spending in 2025 cost taxpayers roughly $895 billion. I come from a military family myself, and I will always respect our troops and appreciate their service. I also believe it's important that our country be able to defend itself. That being said, we're sending all this money overseas, while our bridges are crumbling and our schools can't afford new textbooks.
Reducing our military budget by even 1% and reallocating those funds could help address these needs. I support using West Virginians' tax dollars to tangibly improve their lives, not fund forever wars.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
Immigration enforcement is important. But ICE is violating people’s rights, engaging in federal overreach, and encroaching on West Virginia’s local communities. Our judges have ruled that dozens of people have been wrongfully detained in West Virginia. I’ll continue to stand up for the constitutional rights of West Virginians and fight violations of due process.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vincegeorgeforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00928440
43¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($134K of $311.6K). Cash on hand went from $124.9K on Mar 31, 2026 to $3.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $124,850 | $0 | $124,850 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 22, 2026 | $131,385 | $0 | $256,235 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $2,095 | $0 | $258,330 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $49,300 | $103,330 | $25,608 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $3,956 | $30,652 | $3,138 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 23,382 votes (53%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Lost · 82,705 votes (40%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Total reported receipts $311,586
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
90% of the money placed by state came from inside West Virginia: $5.6K of $6.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 90% | $5,550 |
| 1 contribution · 9.8% | $600 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 2 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 70% of ranked | $1,150 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 30% of ranked | $500 |
A further $4,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,330) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 100% of ranked | $900 |
A further $5,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,330) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to George’s campaign or spending on ads about George are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 8.1% to named individuals, 87% to organizations, 4.9% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Clearpath Action Fund, Inc. | $25.5K |
| Person · Writer/performer, Self-Employed · behind Vote for Equality | $1.1K |
Read for all 4 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $133,982
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 8 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 38% of all spending | $51,430 |
| 1 payment · 21% of all spending | $27,900 |
| 1 payment · 19% of all spending | $25,020 |
| 1 payment · 11% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 6.7% of all spending | $9,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $3,412 |
| 1 payment · 1.5% of all spending | $2,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $221 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.