Workers & economic justiceGroups that state a purpose of raising workers’ pay and economic fairness that are not a union or a union’s PAC.CausesPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)West Logan, West VirginiaActive
$1.5M raised, $1.5M spent, $40.9K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
98% filed as other receipts · largest donor Donald Henley, $147.1K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$6.9K spent for candidates and $25.1K against them, most on FL-06 ($8.7K) · $5.2K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Matt Van Epps ($5.2K) · 57% of its support to Democrats, 43% to Republicans. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
For or against 10 candidates$32,030
In regular reports
$29.5K
9 candidates, through Oct 14, 2026
Newer notices
$2.5K
1 notice since Oct 14, 2026
Randy Fine▼ Against · House, FL-063 records, latest Mar 26, 2025 · FEC filing$8.7K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“We bring fearless messaging, grassroots organizing, and cutting-edge tech to uplift bold progressive candidates. We’re here to expose corporate corruption and counter right-wing propaganda because it’s time to shift public discourse, elect champions of working people, and build a democracy that serves all of us, not just the rich and powerful.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$12.1K to 5 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $12,074
Democratic 57%Republican 43%
Against candidates $25,107
Republican 88%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
4
$0
$6,924
$6,924
57%
Republican
1
$5,150
$0
$5,150
43%
Shown support
5
$5,150
$6,924
$12,074
100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$5,150 in 2 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Republican candidates
1
$5.2K · 100%
All recipients
1
$5.2K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
Bars drawn to $5.2K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Matthew Robert Van Epps2 receipts, latest Nov 10, 2025Matt VAN Epps for Congress · H6TN07161$5.2K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
$5.2K across 1 recipient committee, or 0.3% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,492,266 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,461,39298%
Where it came from
Donald Henley78 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · PROFESSIONAL MUSICIAN, WRITER, PRODUCE · DONALD HENLEY · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA$147,125
Annette Ghezzi2 contributions, latest Feb 11, 2025 · SAN JOSE, CA$10,000
Jacqueline Michaud2 contributions, latest Aug 20, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · WASHINGTON, DC$10,000
Elizabeth Cabraser88 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · ATTORNEY · LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN · SEBASTOPOL, CA$7,580
Stephen Crump47 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · NORWOOD, MA$6,580
Sarah Bushong-WeeksOne contribution on Sep 14, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · DENVER, CO$5,000
Nadette Jacob2 contributions, latest Mar 19, 2025 · HONEOYE FALLS, NY$5,000
Cliff Welles40 contributions, latest Dec 25, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · BONITA SPRNGS, FL$4,447
David Sprowls279 contributions, latest Oct 5, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · CORVALLIS, OR$4,380
Becky Kauffman2 contributions, latest Mar 27, 2026 · WAXAHACHIE, TX$4,000
Elizabeth Macrae2 contributions, latest Jul 25, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · BONITA SPRINGS, FL$4,000
Clifford Welles28 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · BONITA SPRINGS, FL$3,115
Actblue6 receipts, latest Mar 29, 2026 · Somerville, Massachusetts$682
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$18,2121.2%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$12,6630.8%
Total reported receipts $1,492,266
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $1.5M followed back through up to 3 committees
19% to named individuals, 81% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.4M 93%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee81%
$1,206,440
Donald HenleyPerson · Professional Musician, Writer, Produce, Donald Henley · Charlottesville, VA · 9.9%
$147,125
Annette GhezziPerson · San Jose, CA · 0.7%
$10,000
Jacqueline MichaudPerson · Washington, DC · 0.7%
$10,000
Elizabeth CabraserPerson · Attorney, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein · Sebastopol, CA · 0.5%
$7,580
47 smaller sources, $111.1K in all (7.4%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $498,744 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $6.1K
$6.1K+
$24.5K+
$55.2K+
$98.1K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Virginia211 contributions · 31%
$153,211
California1,329 contributions · 16%
$77,813
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,513,356 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,426,52894%
Paid to
Switchboard31 payments · latest Oct 7, 2026 · TEXT PROGRAM$239,348
RMS Group48 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · COMMUNICATIONS$78,000
C2G16 payments · latest Jun 3, 2026 · EMAIL AND MARKETING$72,120
Hall, Steven45 payments · latest Oct 14, 2026 · STAFF PAYROLL: COMPLIANCE AND FINANCE$71,032
MDC Group42 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · DATA ANALYSIS$69,134
Amalgamated Bank1 payment · latest Dec 30, 2025 · BANK FEES$15
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$5,1500.3%
Paid to
Lamar2 payments · latest Nov 10, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION$5,150
Total reported disbursements $1,513,356
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,458,577 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$4.8K of it was independent spending for Samuel S.-H. Wang and for Richard N. Ojeda$334,80223%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN TEXT FUNDRAISINGIndependent spending: $1.3K in support of Richard N. Ojeda
Spending over time
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $449.4K, Jan 1 – Apr 21, 2025.
$1.5M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$27,762
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$131,043
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$166,135
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$166,497
Dec 23 – Dec 31, 2025$717
Nov 13 – Dec 22, 2025$75,087
Jul 1 – Nov 12, 2025$265,229
Apr 22 – Jun 30, 2025$231,528
Jan 1 – Apr 21, 2025$449,358
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “TURN LEFT” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Turn Left PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Editorially reviewed organization match
Match confidence
low
Source coverage
Official pages captured
7
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Massachusetts359 contributions · 6%
$29,814
Florida380 contributions · 5.7%
$28,464
Texas307 contributions · 5%
$24,776
New York397 contributions · 4.3%
$21,610
Colorado253 contributions · 3.8%
$18,910
Maryland295 contributions · 3.1%
$15,522
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 4,588 contributions · 49% of ranked
$227,956
Donald Henley52 contributions · 24% of ranked
$110,300
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 452 contributions · 9.8% of ranked
$45,383
Donald H Henley8 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$13,350
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein88 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$7,580
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 61 contributions · 0.9% of ranked
$3,977
Forest City Enterprises1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$2,500
RT Specialty10 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$2,500
A further $34,390 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,212) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 4,478 contributions · 46% of ranked
$216,280
Professional Musician Writer Produce52 contributions · 23% of ranked
$110,300
Professional Musician26 contributions · 7.8% of ranked
$36,825
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 224 contributions · 3.4% of ranked
$16,064
Attorney115 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$8,780
Executive55 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$5,800
Physician83 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$3,545
Self-employedWritten instead of an occupation · 75 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$2,855
A further $29,077 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,212) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$275,57119%
Filed as
TEXT PROGRAM$84,716
EMAIL AND MARKETING$72,379
SOFTWARE$51,689
SEE ADDITIONAL TEXT PAGE$18,731
EMAIL SOFTWARE$15,634
WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT$15,552
BUDGET SOFTWARE$5,337
TEXT MESSAGING PLATFORM SERVICES$3,651
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION$2,281
WORKSPACE EMAIL AND COLLABORATION SUBSCRIPTION$1,603
DIGITAL SOFTWARE$1,336
CAMPAIGN BOOKKEEPING SOFTWARE$481
Paid to
Switchboard$88,368
C2G$61,919
Google$15,696
BLD AI$15,552
Klayvio$13,075
Klaviyo$10,460
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$271,38519%
Filed as
STAFF PAYROLL: DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT$38,866
STAFF PAYROLL: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR$28,248
STAFF PAYROLL: OPERATIONS$27,750
STAFF PAYROLL: COMPLIANCE AND FINANCE$23,782
DIGITAL STAFF$21,840
STAFF PAYROLL: COMMUNICATIONS$19,500
OPERATIONS STAFF$13,000
CONTRACT LABOR: COMMUNICATION STAFF$12,000
STAFF PAYROLL PAYMENT - OPERATIONS.$10,500
STAFF PAYROLL: DATA ANALYSIS$10,316
STAFF PAYROLL: PAID SURROGATE$9,000
STAFF PAYROLL PAYMENT - COMPLIANCE AND OPERATIONS.$9,000
Paid to
Hall, Steven$43,032
Ponti, Jay$38,250
Archibald, Cory$32,181
Graham, David$32,014
Plumley, Melissa$25,621
Debona, John$24,500
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$1.5K of it was independent spending for Britta Aguirre and against Carol Devine Miller$168,34512%
Filed as
CONTRACT LABOR: LEADERSHIP$51,783
COMMUNICATIONS$47,500
OPERATIONS$21,250
DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT$15,500
CONTRACT LABOR: DIGITAL TEAM$15,500
CAMPAIGN LEADERSHIP$9,530
PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENT-BUILDING AND CREATIVE ACTIVISM SERVICES FOR CAMPAIGN OUTREACH$3,500
PROJECT MANAGEMENT$1,265
Supporting CandidateIndependent spending in support of Britta Aguirre$750
Opposing CandidateIndependent spending in opposition to Carol Devine Miller$750
DIGITAL PRODUCTION$600
No description filed$417
Paid to
RMS Group$47,500
Neptune Political$30,608
Ponti, Jay$27,000
Shire Civics Corp$21,250
APH Digital LLC$15,500
Debona, John$9,500
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$128,4388.8%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN DIGITAL CONSULTING$19,500
CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$18,500
CONTRACT LABOR: COMPLIANCE/BOOKKEEPING$17,500
POLITICAL CONSULTING AND CAMPAIGN STRATEGY SERVICES$14,000
POLITICAL CONSULTING AND CAMPAIGN STRATEGY SERVICES.$13,000
COMPLIANCE$10,500
DIGITAL CONSULTING$7,000
COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE$6,000
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$6,000
POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING AND CAMPAIGN STRATEGY SERVICE.$6,000
LEGAL SERVICES.$2,650
COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION$2,000
Paid to
Hall, Steven$28,000
RMS Group$24,500
APH Digital LLC$19,500
Overton Strategies LLC$14,000
Neptune Political$13,000
Integrated Solutions Political$9,500
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$21.9K of it was independent spending against Randy Fine and against Jimmy Patronis Jr. and 2 more$96,5806.6%
Filed as
CONTRACT LABOR: DIGITAL MEDIA$16,500
DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending: $2.5K in opposition to Randy Fine$10,478
BILLBOARD EXPENSE IN OPPOSITION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY$9,590
CONTRACT LABOR - DIGITAL MEDIA PRODUCTION AND CONTENT SERVICES.$9,000
CAMPAIGN VIDEO$8,050
BillboardIndependent spending: $4.1K in opposition to Jimmy Patronis Jr. · $3.2K in opposition to Randy Fine$7,357
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$71,8544.9%
Filed as
DATA ANALYSIS$45,523
DATA ACQUISTION$16,721
CONSULTING SERVICES TEXT AND DATA SERVICES$7,610
DATA ANALYTICS AND VOTER FILE SERVICES.$2,000
Paid to
MDC Group$53,134
True Blue Analytics$16,721
Grassroots Analytics$2,000
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$58,6104%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$50,706
CREDIT CARD FEES$7,904
Paid to
ActBlue$53,553
ActBlue Technical Services$5,057
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$1.4K of it was independent spending for Nida Allam$44,9643.1%
Filed as
TEXT FEES$16,703
PAYROLL FEES$13,070
MERCHANT ACCOUNT FEES$9,092
PAYROLL: TAXES$4,154
Text message processing fees.Independent spending in support of Nida Allam$1,394
BANK FEES$549
Paid to
SwitchboardIndependent spending: $1.4K in support of Nida Allam$18,097
Gusto$17,224
ActBlue Technical Services$9,092
Amalgamated Bank$430
Amalgamted Bank$119
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$5,1500.4%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$5,150
Paid to
Lamar$5,150
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$1,5140.1%
Filed as
OFFICE SUPPLIES$1,514
Paid to
Amazon$1,514
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$1,364<0.1%
Filed as
VIRTUAL BUSINESS ADDRESS AND SECURE MAIL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMITTEE CORRESPONDENCE.$570
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,350 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Switchboard38 payments · 16% of all spending
$248,334
RMS Group48 payments · 5.2% of all spending
$78,000
C2G18 payments · 5.1% of all spending
$76,616
Hall, Steven45 payments · 4.7% of all spending
$71,032
MDC Group42 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$69,134
Ponti, Jay37 payments · 4.3% of all spending
$65,250
ActBlue95 payments · 3.5% of all spending
$53,553
True Blue Analytics22 payments · 3.5% of all spending
$53,512
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Switchboard31 payments, latest Oct 7, 2026TEXT PROGRAM$239.3K
RMS Group48 payments, latest Oct 1, 2026COMMUNICATIONS$78K
C2G16 payments, latest Jun 3, 2026EMAIL AND MARKETING$72.1K
Hall, Steven45 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026STAFF PAYROLL: COMPLIANCE AND FINANCE$71K
MDC Group42 payments, latest Oct 1, 2026DATA ANALYSIS$69.1K
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 1,287 payments totaling $1.4M.