A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 38 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $28.3K.
LoansMoney the campaign borrowed this cycle, from the candidate or a lender, which it may repay.$10,00021%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$9,69620%
Total reported receipts $48,004
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $28,299 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.1K
$1.1K+
$4.4K+
$9.8K+
$17.4K+
none
Outlined: Utah, home state
Home state and away
Utah 96%UT 96%
96% of the money placed by state came from inside Utah: $27.3K of $28.3K.
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Utah home37 contributions · 96%
$27,258
Florida1 contribution · 3.7%
$1,041
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 2 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 21 contributions · 43% of ranked
$12,031
Lloyd Shumway Livestock INC
Money from groups, by interest $33,500
What the committees giving to Lyman’s campaign or spending on ads about Lyman are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Against Lyman $33,500
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
$33.5KTap a slice
Nothing yet says what these committees are: no statement, site, government record or funder we can use. Their money counts here until a source turns up. We do not guess.$33.5K100%
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
RPhillip Kay Lymanthis candidate1 group▲Supporting $0▼Opposing $33.5KTotal $33.5K
Who stands behind the outside spending: the people and organizations its money traces to
Who stands behind the outside spending $1.7M traced back through the groups that spent it
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 5.1% to named individuals, 86% to organizations, 8.1% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 1.1% not itemized in the filings.
People and organizations the race's outside spending traces to
Name
Amount
Public First Action, IncOrganization · behind Defending Our Values PAC
$578.4K
Public First ActionOrganization · behind Defending Our Values PAC
$358.4K
Government Leadership SolutionsOrganization · behind Keeping America Strong PAC
$300K
American Conservation Coalition Action, Inc.Organization · behind American Conservation Coalition PAC
$127.6K
American Conservation Coalition Action Inc.Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind American Conservation Coalition PAC
$127.6K
All in for Utah
What the payments were for $49,275 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$26,80854%
Filed as
ADVERTIISNG$10,600
No description filed$7,267
CONVENTION$3,000
HATS FOR CONVENTION$2,231
CONVENTION PAYMENT$1,400
CARBON COUNTY GOP LDD$1,150
PLATTER FOR CONVENTION$350
LYMAN WRISTBANDS$315
CONVENTION PMT FOR MATERIALS$250
FLYERS$244
Paid to
SQ *white DOG Media$10,600
Utah Republican Party$4,400
Moss, Tanner$4,000
Shumway, Lloyd$3,000
PY *wasatch Prints$2,231
Carbon County GOP$1,150
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Moss, Tanner6 payments · 24% of all spending
$12,000
SQ *white DOG Media1 payment · 21% of all spending
$10,600
Utah Republican Party4 payments · 8.7% of all spending
$4,400
SQ *iron Mountain Rock PR1 payment · 8.5% of all spending
$4,290
Shumway, Lloyd1 payment · 5.9% of all spending
$3,000
Redd Printing Sale REF # 026118009741968 Redd Printing 9215986202SALE CCD Phil Lyman for Congresref # 26118009741968 9741968 (redd Printing Sale CCD Phil Lyma1 payment · 4.5% of all spending
$2,309
PY *wasatch Prints1 payment · 4.4% of all spending
$2,231
Townsquare Media Inc1 payment · 4.3% of all spending
EndorsementsWho does Lyman’s campaign say backs them?
Not read yet
We have not found a campaign site for Phil Lyman yet.
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Campaign pages read 0 pages
No campaign pages quoted
We have not found a campaign site for this candidate yet.
2 contributions · 23% of ranked
$6,500
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 9.6% of ranked
$2,705
Work1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked
$2,082
Construction1 contribution · 6.9% of ranked
$1,961
Angel Studios INC1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked
$1,000
Ping Identity2 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$1,000
FN2 LLC2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$520
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,696) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 21 contributions · 43% of ranked
$12,031
Cattle Operation2 contributions · 23% of ranked
$6,500
Admin1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked
$2,082
Construction1 contribution · 6.9% of ranked
$1,961
Geologist Director Investor1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked
$1,041
Bookseller3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked
$1,040
CEO1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked
$1,000
Prof Sacs2 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$1,000
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,696) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Support and oppose are each group’s own labels, not a judgment made here.
$1,632,356 of the race total was filed about other candidates, so it would not show on Lyman’s own record.
Independent expenditures (Schedule E) only. Electioneering communications and corporate or union member communications file separately; they are counted for Lymanunder “Other outside spending” in the full finance detail, but not for the rest of the field, so every other row is a floor.
Organization · behind Defending Utah Values Federal Super PAC
Peter LofgrenPerson · Member of Technical Staff, Anthropic PBC · behind Defending Our Values PAC
$7.3K
Todor Mihaylov MarkovPerson · Research Scientist, Meta Superintelligence Labs · behind Defending Our Values PAC
$5.9K
Occidential Petroleum Corp.Organization · behind Defending Utah Values Federal Super PAC
$5.7K
Read for all 5 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.
$10,50721%
Filed as
SIGNS AND MEDIA$4,290
ADVERTISING$2,693
BILLBOARD$2,024
CONVENTION VIDEO$1,500
Paid to
SQ *iron Mountain Rock PR$4,290
Townsquare Media Inc$2,178
Compass Billboards$2,024
Beckham, Brandon$1,500
Uinta Broadcasting$515
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$8,00016%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT$8,000
Paid to
Moss, Tanner$8,000
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$3,4036.9%
Filed as
SIGNS AND PRINT$2,309
SIGNS AND PRINTING$1,094
Paid to
Redd Printing Sale REF # 026118009741968 Redd Printing 9215986202SALE CCD Phil Lyman for Congresref # 26118009741968 9741968 (redd Printing Sale CCD Phil Lyma$2,309
Redd Printing Sale REF # 026118009741886 Redd Printing 9215986202SALE CCD Phil Lyman for Congresref # 26118009741886 9741886 (redd Printing Sale CCD Phil Lyma$892
Redd Printing Sale REF # 026118009741658 Redd Printing 9215986202SALE CCD Phil Lyman for Congresref # 26118009741658 9741658 (redd Printing Sale CCD Phil Lyma$202
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$2840.6%
Filed as
HOTEL$284
Paid to
HOTELCOM73450244388282$284
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$2730.6%
Filed as
PHONE BANK$273
Paid to
Twilio Sendgrid$273
Total itemized disbursements $49,275
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
All 31 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$2,178
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.