Electing women's & communities' candidatesGroups whose purpose is electing, or mobilizing voters for, candidates from a shared community: women, or Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander candidates, among others. The community has to be an identity people share, not an age bracket or a political stance.Causes
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$4.7M raised, $3.6M spent, $1.3M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
96% filed as other receipts · largest donor Kenneth Fisher, $499K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$3.5M spent for candidates and $327.5K against them, most on SC-01 ($1.2M) · $186.6K given to candidates and committees, the largest to GOP Winning Women 2026 ($75.5K) · 100% of its support to Republicans. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“Winning For Women is a 501(c)(4) dedicated to strengthening our country by identifying, supporting, and advancing the next generation of conservative leaders who will govern thoughtfully, support strong national security, and champion economic freedom. In addition to educating and advocating for conservative policies, Winning For Women endorses conservative women in their pursuit of federal elected office based on their alignment with our core values and their ability to deliver real results for our country.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$3.6M to 24 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $3,600,650
Republican 100%
Against candidates $327,546
Democratic 84%Republican 16%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$186,550 in 32 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Republican candidates
22
$102.5K · 54%
Other PACs and committees
3
$85.8K · 46%
All recipients
25
$188.3K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Texas
4
$19K
South Carolina
2
$15K
Florida
2
$10K
Louisiana
2
$10K
North Carolina
1
$7.5K
Nevada
1
$5K
Missouri
1
$5K
Washington
1
$5K
The largest 8 of 16 states.
Recipients 25
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $4,735,466 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$4,534,56796%
Where it came from
Kenneth FisherOne contribution on Sep 29, 2026 · CHAIRMAN · FISHER INVESTMENTS · PLANO, TX$499,000
Sherrilyn FisherOne contribution on Oct 13, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · PLANO 6500, LLC · PLANO, TX$499,000
Winning for Women Inc2 receipts, latest Sep 18, 2026 · WASHINGTON, District of Columbia$401,567
Cliff Asness2 contributions, latest Oct 7, 2026 · FINANCE · AQR CAPITAL · NEW YORK, NY$375,000
Leon Rachel Corp1 receipt, latest Oct 2, 2026 · SPRINGFIELD, Virginia$250,000
Paul E. SingerOne contribution on Apr 16, 2025 · ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT L.P. · CO-CEO CO-CIO PRESIDENT · BOSTON, MA$250,000
The Charles & Helen Schwab Living Trust1 receipt, latest Apr 28, 2026 · PALM BEACH, Florida$200,000
Pop's TOP Shop1 receipt, latest Jun 9, 2026 · SUMMERVILLE, South Carolina$50,000
Philip J. PurcellOne contribution on Aug 6, 2026 · FOUNDER · CONTINENTAL INVESTORS LLC · PARK CITY, UT$50,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1M from 8 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$150,5433.2%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$25,0000.5%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$14,0000.3%
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $37K, more than the $14K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$9,6560.2%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$1,700<0.1%
Total reported receipts $4,735,466
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $4.7M followed back through up to 3 committees
54% to named individuals, 16% to organizations, 5.4% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 24% not itemized.
Gave directly$4.3M 90%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee24%
$1,136,356
Kenneth FisherPerson · Chairman, Fisher Investments · Plano, TX · also behind 4 other groups · 11%
$499,000
Sherrilyn FisherPerson · Executive, Plano 6500, LLC · Plano, TX · also behind 1 other group · 11%
$499,000
Winning for Women IncOrganization · 8.5%
$401,567
Cliff AsnessPerson · Finance, AQR Capital · New York, NY · also behind 4 other groups · 7.9%
$375,000
Leon Rachel CorpOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 5.3%
$250,000
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $2,959,567 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $42.1K
$42.1K+
$168.5K+
$379.1K+
$673.9K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Texas5 contributions · 36%
$1,053,000
New York3 contributions · 17%
$500,000
District of Columbia2 contributions · 14%
$401,567
Virginia3 contributions · 12%
$355,000
Massachusetts1 contribution · 8.4%
$250,000
Illinois4 contributions · 5.1%
$150,000
Florida1 contribution · 3.4%
$100,000
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $3,583,468 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$2,724,34176%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$143<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $3,583,468
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $3,580,982 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$2.7M of it was independent spending for Jenny Costa Honeycutt and for Alexandra Mealer and 10 more$3,574,24099.8%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: MEDIA PLACEMENTIndependent spending: $1.1M in support of Jenny Costa Honeycutt · $250K in support of Alexandra Mealer and 3 more$1,625,450
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: DIGITAL MEDIA PLACEMENTIndependent spending: $241.8K in support of Alexandra Mealer · $175.8K in support of Jessica Hart Steinmann and 2 more$475,636
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: PRINTING / POSTAGEIndependent spending: $93.1K in support of Sydney Gruters and 1 more
Spending over time
$3.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $879.9K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
$3.6M1
Jan 2025Nov 2026
1Nov 3, 2026 general election, SC-01$741.5K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$879,859
September 2026$467,728
August 2026$203,148
July 2026$146,621
June 2026$311,462
May 2026$382,528
April 2026$310,980
March 2026$35,628
February 2026$297,377
January 2026$232,992
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$208,465
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$106,680
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “WFW ACTION FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
LBLaurie BuckhoutRepublican · U.S. House · NC-01 · via Laurie Buckhout For Congress2 payments, latest Oct 8, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Oct 8, 2026$7.5K
CBCarrie BuckRepublican · U.S. House · NV-01 · via Carrie Buck For Congress1 payment, latest Mar 19, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Mar 19, 2026$5K
AWAnn WagnerRepublican · U.S. House · MO-02 · via Ann Wagner For Congress2 payments, latest Oct 7, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Oct 7, 2026$5K
AMAmanda McKinneyRepublican · U.S. House · WA-04 · via Amanda McKinney For Washington1 payment, latest Feb 2, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Feb 2, 2026$5K
Bars drawn to $75.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Jenny Costa Honeycutt2 receipts, latest Oct 8, 2026Jenny for Congress · H6SC01334$10K
Laurie Buckhout2 receipts, latest Oct 8, 2026Laurie Buckhout for Congress · H4NC01137$7.5K
Ann L. Wagner2 receipts, latest Oct 7, 2026Ann Wagner for Congress · H2MO02102$5K
Tricia Pridemore1 receipt, latest May 6, 2026Tricia for Congress, Inc. · H4GA11087$5K
Darline Graham1 receipt, latest Aug 7, 2026Darline for Senate · S6SC04437$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Paul E. SingerPerson · Elliott Investment Management L.P., Co-CEO Co-CIO President · Boston, MA · also behind 22 other groups · 5.3%
$250,000
The Charles & Helen Schwab Living TrustOrganization · 4.2%
$200,000
Laurel AsnessPerson · Homemaker · New York, NY · 2.6%
$125,000
Craig DuchossoisPerson · Executive Chair Emeritus, The Duchossois Group · Chicago, IL · also behind 3 other groups · 2.1%
$100,000
Show 8 more sources
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Richard GilliamPerson · President, Cumberland Development · Charlottesville, VA · also behind 1 other group · 2.1%
$100,000
Ian SchaadPerson · Retired · Jupiter, FL · also behind 1 other group · 2.1%
$100,000
Pop's TOP ShopOrganization · 1.1%
$50,000
Philip J. PurcellPerson · Founder, Continental Investors LLC · Park City, UT · 1.1%
Joe PopoloPerson · CEO, Charles & Potomac Capital LLC · Dallas, TX · 0.7%
$35,000
Still Point TrustOrganization · 0.5%
$25,000
Frederick SmithPerson · Executive, UI Solutions Group · Chicago, IL · 0.5%
$25,000
Through Veterans Duty FundVeterans & national security (proposed)$73.6K 1.6%
Through Veterans Duty Fund
Name
Amount
David ModesettPerson · President, Vega Energy Holdings · Houston, TX · 1.6%
$73,576
343 smaller sources, $381K in all (8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
South Carolina1 contribution · 1.7%
$50,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Fisher Investments1 contribution · 22% of ranked
$499,000
Plano 6500 LLC1 contribution · 22% of ranked
$499,000
AQR Capital2 contributions · 16% of ranked
$375,000
Co-ceo Co-cio President1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$250,000
HomemakerWritten instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 6% of ranked
$137,500
Cumberland Development1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
The Duchossois Group1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
A further $671,567 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Executive2 contributions · 23% of ranked
$524,000
Chairman1 contribution · 22% of ranked
$499,000
Finance2 contributions · 16% of ranked
$375,000
Elliott Investment Management L P1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$250,000
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 6% of ranked
$137,500
Executive Chair Emeritus1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
President1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked
$100,000
A further $671,567 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$826<0.1%
Filed as
LEGAL CONSULTING$603
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING$89
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$76
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$58
Paid to
Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLC$603
Blackpoint Impact LLC$89
Crosby Ottenhoff Group$76
Arsenal Public Relations LLC$58
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$193<0.1%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$193
Paid to
Elliott Group Consulting LLC$193
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$12<0.1%
Filed as
TAX CONSULTING$12
Paid to
Atchley & Associates$12
Total itemized disbursements $3,580,982
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 266 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
5 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $8,295 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Flexpoint Media Inc13 payments · 39% of all spending
$1,411,150
Alamo Intelligence LLC12 payments · 20% of all spending
$732,636
Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky PLLC26 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$121,932
Canvass America LLC2 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$110,000
FP1 Strategies LLC2 payments · 3% of all spending
$108,279
KAP Print LLC4 payments · 2.6% of all spending
$93,053
Blackpoint Impact LLC14 payments · 2.6% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
