Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TN-07 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TN-07
Has not served in Congress
5 priorities from dardenforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Health care costs are crushing Tennessee families, and Washington's answer has been to make it worse. Cutting a trillion dollars from Medicaid doesn't save money — it closes rural hospitals and sends families to the emergency room for basic care, where we all pay more.
Darden grew up watching his mom work the overnight shift at a factory just to keep the family's health benefits. He knows what a safety net means. In Congress, he'll fight to protect Medicaid, defend affordable health care premiums, lower prescription drug costs, and keep rural hospitals open, because your health shouldn't depend on your zip code or your paycheck. And Darden knows that when we lose a hospital we are losing an entire ecosystem. That not only means less healthcare options, it means fewer jobs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dardenforcongress.com/home-2
Washington is broken because too many politicians in both parties treat public office like a stock portfolio. Members of Congress should work for you…not trade on information the rest of us will never see.
Darden supports a full ban on stock trading by members of Congress, their families, and members of the Executive Branch. Darden also refuses to take corporate PAC money during his campaign. He supports term limits, because Congress should be a period of service — not a lifetime career. Corruption isn't a partisan problem, and Darden will call it out wherever it lives, including in his own party.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dardenforcongress.com/home-2
Darden believes in protecting social security and Medicare so that our seniors can retire with dignity and without financial fears. We all have paid into Social Security and Medicare with every paycheck. They are earned benefits, not handouts — and Darden will fight any attempt by Speaker Johnson and his allies to cut them.
While Washington Republicans push plans to slash benefits, raise the retirement age, and hand Medicare over to private insurers, Darden will draw a hard line: no cuts, no privatization, no games with the retirement security of Tennessee's seniors. Period.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dardenforcongress.com/home-2
Darden will stand up to Donald Trump and the MAGA extremists who are making everything more expensive. He believes in checks and balances and will not be a rubber stamp for any president or party. Darden is going to do what is right for the people of District 7. He’s less worried about right versus left and more worried about right versus wrong.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dardenforcongress.com/home-2
Too many Tennessee families are working harder than ever and still falling behind. Housing, groceries, health care, child care…the costs keep climbing while paychecks don't keep up.
Darden will fight to lower costs for working families: taking on price gouging, expanding affordable housing, capping prescription drug prices, and making child care affordable. He'll fight to make corporations and the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share — not squeeze the middle class.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dardenforcongress.com/home-2
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00913301
94¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($1.2M of $1.3M). Cash on hand went from $383.3K on Sep 17, 2025 to $73.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRE-SPECIAL 2025 through Sep 17, 2025 | $431,061 | $47,723 | $383,338 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $156,738 | $447,880 | $92,197 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $116,497 | $203,620 | $5,074 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,783 | $500 | $7,356 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $87,031 | $17,500 | $76,888 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 17, 2026 | $74,504 | $72,703 | $78,689 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $237,085 | $195,066 | $120,708 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $151,503 | $198,525 | $73,686 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
No endorsements page
Lost · 7,716 votes (25%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Advanced · 16,641 votes (40%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Lost · 115,867 votes (48%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 759 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $399K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 6 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $13K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,257,202
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
70% of the money placed by state came from inside Tennessee: $280.4K of $399K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 435 contributions · 70% | $280,428 |
| 34 contributions · 4.1% | $16,343 |
| 70 contributions · 4.1% | $16,320 |
| 19 contributions · 3.5% | $13,780 |
| 30 contributions · 2.8% | $11,237 |
| 10 contributions · 1.5% | $5,920 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% | $5,545 |
| 20 contributions · 1.4% | $5,425 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 40 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 356 contributions · 32% of ranked | $127,086 |
| Written instead of an employer · 68 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $31,488 |
| Written instead of an employer · 19 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $8,525 |
| 11 contributions · 2% of ranked | $8,050 |
| 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $6,000 |
A further $1,825 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($178,809) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Copeland’s campaign or spending on ads about Copeland are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 42% to named individuals, 31% to organizations, 16% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.6% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 10% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Founder & CEO, Citadel · behind American Patriots PAC and Conservatives for American Excellence Inc. | $499.5K |
| Organization · behind Conservatives for American Excellence Inc. | $466.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC and HMP | $385.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $296.2K |
| Person · Managing Director, Susquehanna International GRP · behind Club for Growth Action and School Freedom Fund and 1 more | $267.3K |
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind Club for Growth Action | $191.7K |
| Person · Co-CEO & President, Elliott Investment Management · behind Conservatives for American Excellence Inc. and American Liberty Foundation | $140K |
| Organization · behind Maga Inc. | $131.6K |
| Organization · behind Patriotic Fund, Inc. | $124.5K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind Maga Inc. | $112.8K |
| Organization · behind American Liberty Foundation | $112.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC | $112.1K |
Read for the 20 largest groups of 31, 99% of the $7M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $1,182,456
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 147 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 31% of all spending | $369,478 |
| 5 payments · 9.7% of all spending | $115,321 |
| 5 payments · 9% of all spending | $106,310 |
| 4 payments · 8.4% of all spending | $99,436 |
| 2 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $72,000 |
| 26 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $65,115 |
| 4 payments · 5% of all spending | $59,361 |
| 3 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $49,253 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 355 contributions · 32% of ranked | $126,811 |
| 55 contributions · 11% of ranked | $43,150 |
| 37 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $22,000 |
| 21 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $18,050 |
| 24 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $16,600 |
| 9 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $11,450 |
| 8 contributions · 2% of ranked | $7,900 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 21 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,093 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($178,809) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.