Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › OH-09 race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. House, OH-09Ohio
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Wayne Charles Kinsel’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2025 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00908731
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 21 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $31K.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 3 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $90,565
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2025.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
55% of the money placed by state came from inside Ohio: $17K of $31K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 55% | $17,000 |
| 2 contributions · 23% | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 12% | $3,737 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% | $1,033 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% | $980 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% | $490 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $260 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $245 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 9 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 43% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 1 contribution · 37% of ranked | $3,443 |
| 4 contributions · 19% of ranked | $1,779 |
A further $21,763 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($884) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 43% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 1 contribution · 37% of ranked | $3,443 |
| 2 contributions · 13% of ranked | $1,225 |
What the committees giving to Kinsel’s campaign or spending on ads about Kinsel are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 38% to named individuals, 25% to organizations, 24% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 13% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $1.7M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF | $1.5M |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and America PAC and 3 more | $908.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Cffe PAC and New American Jobs Fund and 2 more | $593.1K |
| Person · Investments, Self-Employed · behind CLF | $486.5K |
| Person · Physician, Adelson Drug Clinic · behind CLF and Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and 2 more | $460.3K |
| Person · Managing Director, STG · behind Club for Growth Action and Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and 3 more | $432.5K |
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind Club for Growth Action and American Principles Project PAC | $403.8K |
| Person · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · behind HMP and New American Jobs Fund and 2 more | $372.6K |
| Organization · behind Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $320.1K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $274.4K |
| Organization · behind Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $223.4K |
Read for the 19 largest groups of 42, 99% of the $20.6M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $57,424
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2025.
All 19 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 58% of all spending | $33,536 |
| 4 payments · 17% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 11% of all spending | $6,500 |
| 1 payment · 2.7% of all spending | $1,565 |
| 2 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $1,364 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $1,250 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $1,182 |
| 1 payment · 1.9% of all spending | $1,108 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
No ballot result matched to this candidate
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| 2 contributions · 6% of ranked |
| $554 |
A further $21,763 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($884) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.