Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AK-00 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, AK-00
Has not served in Congress
Matt Schultz’s words are not shown
Campaign committee · 2025–2026 · latest available filing · Official FEC bulk data
93¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($846.4K of $906.3K). Cash on hand went from $220.6K on Dec 31, 2025 to $60K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $309,040 | $88,475 | $220,565 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $270,616 | $142,891 | $348,290 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $285,777 | $163,386 | $470,681 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $40,870 | $449,347 | $62,203 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $0 | $2,251 | $59,952 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No receipts reported
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
85% of the money placed by state came from inside Alaska: $526.7K of $617.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,163 contributions · 85% | $526,694 |
| 39 contributions · 3.4% | $20,829 |
| 27 contributions · 2.1% | $12,950 |
| 21 contributions · 1.5% | $9,020 |
| 92 contributions · 1.4% | $8,679 |
| 7 contributions · 1.1% | $6,800 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% | $4,024 |
| 5 contributions · 0.6% | $3,889 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 26 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,605 contributions · 61% of ranked | $356,571 |
| Written instead of an employer · 145 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $36,034 |
| Written instead of an employer · 66 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $23,075 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $6,750 |
| 39 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,111 |
| 7 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,100 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $23,675 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 31% to named individuals, 23% to organizations, 39% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 7.4% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Wheel DOG PAC and Your Community PAC and 1 more | $3.5M |
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind Club for Growth Action | $1.1M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Wheel DOG PAC and Cornerstone Founders PAC and 1 more | $1M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $1M |
| Person · Managing Director, SIG · behind Club for Growth Action and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $793.6K |
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments | $201,075 |
| 6 payments | $145,657 |
| 92 payments | $131,095 |
| 15 payments | $105,653 |
| 9 payments | $33,066 |
| 44 payments | $29,073 |
| 12 payments | $28,367 |
| 10 payments | $25,904 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 12,268 votes (8%) · 3 of 15 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Election November 3, 2026 · 9 polls of this matchup
Nick Begich leads Bill Hill by 3.4 points · average gap, 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. Some polls published only first choices, which run lower than a final round. How polls are read
Pairings that are not the race on the ballot: candidates who lost a primary or withdrew, or a party's unnamed nominee. They are not charted.
Primary August 18, 2026 · 2 polls
Each dot is a poll. A line is drawn from the third nonpartisan poll; there are 2 so far. How polls are read
Nick Begich, Bill Hill, Matt Schultz and Eric Hafner advanced. The race has been called, but the results source does not say how much of the vote it counted, so the polls are not measured against the margin.
| Poll | Nick Begich | Bill Hill | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result, partial count | 45.2% | 32.1% | — |
August 18, 2026
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 6 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,591 contributions · 59% of ranked | $353,396 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 93 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $29,600 |
| 41 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $17,495 |
| 57 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $14,760 |
| 31 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $6,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,250 |
A further $18,750 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC and HMP |
| $699.7K |
| Organization · behind Wheel DOG PAC | $482.3K |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · behind Wheel DOG PAC and HMP and 1 more | $470.6K |
| Organization · behind Wheel DOG PAC and Your Community PAC | $404.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Wheel DOG PAC | $361.8K |
| Organization · behind Wheel DOG PAC and Your Community PAC and 1 more | $316K |
| Person · Retired · behind Freedom Caucus Fund | $306.3K |
Read for the 17 largest groups of 34, 99% of the $21.3M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Total itemized disbursements $806,831
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid.
All 285 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
23 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $83,777 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.