Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Hafner Eric▼ Against · House, AK$162.2K of it in newer notices, latest Oct 30, 2026 · FEC filing$508.4K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“Endorsed by over 20 Alaskan organizations, Bill Hill is building the coalition to beat Nick Begich and take back the state’s House seat for working Alaskans.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$5.7M to 1 candidate
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $5,740,344
Independent 100%
Against candidates $3,207,801
Republican 84%Democratic 16%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
NEA Advocacy FundSuper PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION · 1 payment
$150K
Working for Working AmericansSuper PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS · 1 payment
$125K
$1.9M from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $7,420,537 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$4,524,45061%
Where it came from
Western Futures Fund3 receipts, latest Oct 6, 2026 · Sheridan, Wyoming$2,515,000
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO2 receipts, latest Sep 9, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$400,000
Sixteen Thirty Fund1 receipt, latest May 20, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$400,000
Contours Inc1 receipt, latest May 4, 2026 · Dover, Delaware$300,000
Global Impact Social Welfare Fund1 receipt, latest Jun 4, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$250,000
Jason Eastwick CarrollOne contribution on Jun 18, 2026 · TRADER · HUDSON RIVER TRADING LLC · NEW YORK, NY$250,000
Samuel WaltonOne contribution on Aug 25, 2026 · OWNER · RESTORATION WORKS, LLC · CARBONDALE, CO$150,000
Debra ErfroymsonOne contribution on Aug 20, 2026 · EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR · INSTITUTE OF WELLBEING · NEW YORK, NY$100,000
Rory GatesOne contribution on Sep 16, 2026 · ANALYST · US SENATE · WASHINGTON, DC$100,000
David Peeler2 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · SENIOR ADVISOR · BERKSHIRE PARTNERS · CAMBRIDGE, ME$27,500
Our Children Our Future1 receipt, latest Aug 26, 2026 · Pasadena, California$25,000
The 12 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $3.9M from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$2,550,00034%
Committees that gave
Way Back PAC8 receipts, latest Sep 17, 2026 · Hybrid pac (qualified)$1,325,000
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$300,5004%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$45,5870.6%
Total reported receipts $7,420,537
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $7.4M followed back through up to 3 committees
22% to named individuals, 22% to organizations, 54% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 2% not itemized.
Gave directly$4.8M 64%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Western Futures FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 34%
$2,515,000
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, AFL-CIOOrganization · 5.4%
$400,000
Sixteen Thirty FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 5.4%
$400,000
Contours IncOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 4%
$300,000
Global Impact Social Welfare FundOrganization · 3.4%
$250,000
Jason Eastwick CarrollPerson · Trader, Hudson River Trading LLC · New York, NY · also behind 4 other groups · 3.4%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $4,824,500 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $100.7K
$100.7K+
$402.8K+
$906.3K+
$1.6M+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Wyoming4 contributions · 52%
$2,517,500
District of Columbia6 contributions · 24%
$1,151,000
New York7 contributions · 7.7%
$371,750
Delaware1 contribution · 6.2%
$300,000
Washington1 contribution · 5.2%
$250,000
Colorado1 contribution · 3.1%
$150,000
California6 contributions · 0.9%
$41,750
Maine2 contributions · 0.6%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $6,894,181 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$6,254,70191%
Spent for or against
Bill HillSupport · 87 records · latest Oct 14, 2026$4,467,248
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $6,893,874 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$5M of it was independent spending for Bill Hill and against Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$5,047,16873%
Filed as
TV BuyIndependent spending: $1M in support of Bill Hill · $532.9K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III$1,533,910
TV Ad BuyIndependent spending: $1.1M in support of Bill Hill · $417.6K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III$1,485,148
Digital Ad Buy
Spending over time
$6.9M spent from Jan 2026 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.8M, Jul 30 – Sep 30, 2026.
$6.9M12
Jan 2026Nov 2026
1Aug 18, 2026 primary, AK-00$2.7M of its independent spending was aimed at it
2Nov 3, 2026 general election, AK-00$3.5M of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$1,763,943
Jul 30 – Sep 30, 2026$2,791,546
Jul 1 – Jul 29, 2026$1,958,789
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$379,903
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$0
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “WHEEL DOG” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Wheel DOG PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Alaskans First Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
United Brotherhood of Carpenters & JoinersOrganization · 1.7%
$125,000
278 smaller sources, $741.9K in all (10%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$27,500
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Greylock Partners1 contribution · 27% of ranked
$250,000
Hudson River Trading LLC1 contribution · 27% of ranked
$250,000
Restoration Works LLC1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$150,000
Institute Of Wellbeing1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$100,000
US Senate1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$100,000
Berkshire Partners2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$27,500
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$25,250
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$10,000
A further $3,890,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Partner1 contribution · 27% of ranked
$250,000
Trader1 contribution · 27% of ranked
$250,000
Owner1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$150,000
Analyst1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$100,000
Executive Director1 contribution · 11% of ranked
$100,000
Senior Advisor2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$27,500
Philanthropist3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$15,000
Director2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$10,000
A further $3,890,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Independent spending: $651.8K in support of Bill Hill · $185.7K in opposition to Hafner Eric and 1 more
$881,783
Radio BuyIndependent spending: $263.4K in support of Bill Hill · $214.7K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III$478,070
Radio Ad BuyIndependent spending: $189.9K in support of Bill Hill · $63.8K in opposition to Hafner Eric and 1 more$306,925
Digital Ad ProductionIndependent spending: $109.5K in support of Bill Hill · $16K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III$125,525
Digital Ad - ProductionIndependent spending: $37.5K in support of Bill Hill · $18.8K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$75,000
Digital - Ad ProductionIndependent spending: $65K in support of Bill Hill · $5K in opposition to Hafner Eric$70,000
TV - Ad ProductionIndependent spending in support of Bill Hill$33,994
Radio - Ad ProductionIndependent spending: $23.6K in support of Bill Hill · $1.9K in opposition to Hafner Eric and 1 more$26,891
MEDIA PLANNING CONSULTANT$25,000
Radio Ad - ProductionIndependent spending: $1.3K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III · $1.3K in support of Bill Hill$2,536
Paid to
Skyward Media PlanningIndependent spending: $2.6M in support of Bill Hill · $1.2M in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$3,945,110
True Blue Strategies LLCIndependent spending: $863.9K in support of Bill Hill · $159.2K in opposition to Hafner Eric and 1 more$1,102,058
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$937.8K of it was independent spending for Bill Hill and against Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$939,25514%
Filed as
MailersIndependent spending: $832.8K in support of Bill Hill · $60K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$937,815
WEB DESIGN$1,440
Paid to
One House StrategiesIndependent spending: $832.8K in support of Bill Hill · $60K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$937,815
Mcdermott, Cole$1,440
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$486,3207.1%
Filed as
PREPAYMENT FOR INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$540,162
POLLING SERVICES-NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$64,000
STRATEGIC POLITICAL CONSULTANT-NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$40,453
MERCHANT PROCESSING FEE - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$93
OFFSET FOR MAILERS PRE-PAID ON 9/25/2026, NOW DISSEMINATED 10/14 - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT-$210,087
Paid to
One House Strategies$330,076
Aspect Strategic$64,000
PAC Services LLC$40,453
Fireweed Campaigns$25,190
AHW Communications$10,000
The Money Wheel, LLC$7,500
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$236K of it was independent spending for Bill Hill and against Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$237,0423.4%
Filed as
Digital BuyIndependent spending: $134.3K in support of Bill Hill · $76.6K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$236,000
TARGETSMARTVAN COMMITTEE SET UP$1,042
Paid to
True Blue Strategies LLCIndependent spending: $134.3K in support of Bill Hill · $76.6K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$236,000
The Mobilization Center LLC$1,042
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$84,6581.2%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT SERVICES$42,668
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT$25,000
COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTING$8,523
STRATEGY CONSULTANT$8,468
Paid to
Fireweed Campaigns$42,668
AHW Communications$25,000
The Money Wheel, LLC$8,523
Kupfer, Patricia$8,468
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$58.7K of it was independent spending for Bill Hill and against Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$58,7190.9%
Filed as
Texting CampaignIndependent spending: $47.1K in support of Bill Hill · $3.4K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$51,414
Texting Campaign - Under ThresholdIndependent spending in support of Bill Hill$3,756
Texting Campaign - Under Reporting ThresholdIndependent spending in support of Bill Hill$3,549
Paid to
Scale to WinIndependent spending: $54.4K in support of Bill Hill · $3.4K in opposition to Nicholas Begich III and 1 more$58,719
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$40,0000.6%
Filed as
STATEWIDE RESEARCH$40,000
Paid to
Summit Analytics Inc.$40,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$713<0.1%
Filed as
MERCHANT PROCESSING FEE$713
Paid to
Oath$713
Total itemized disbursements $6,893,874
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 179 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Skyward Media Planning61 payments · 57% of all spending
$3,945,110
True Blue Strategies LLC32 payments · 19% of all spending
$1,338,058
One House Strategies27 payments · 18% of all spending
$1,267,891
Fireweed Campaigns6 payments · 1% of all spending
$67,858
Aspect Strategic2 payments · 0.9% of all spending
$64,000
Scale to Win24 payments · 0.9% of all spending
$58,719
PAC Services LLC2 payments · 0.6% of all spending
$40,453
Summit Analytics Inc.1 payment · 0.6% of all spending
$40,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
One House Strategies14 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026PREPAYMENT FOR INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$330.1K
Aspect Strategic2 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026POLLING SERVICES-NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$64K
PAC Services LLC2 payments, latest Aug 24, 2026STRATEGIC POLITICAL CONSULTANT-NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$40.5K