Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-18 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TX-18
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Isaiah Martin’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Dec 31, 2025 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00849745
$1.11 has been spent for every dollar raised across 4 reports ($1.4M of $1.2M). Cash on hand went from $218.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $44.7K on Dec 31, 2025.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $71,729 | $28,075 | $218,288 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $116,351 | $142,944 | $191,695 |
| PRE-SPECIAL 2025 through Oct 15, 2025 | $866,666 | $790,659 | $267,702 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $169,197 | $392,232 | $44,667 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,207 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $182.2K.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,223,942
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
17% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $31.3K of $183.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 196 contributions · 25% |
What the committees giving to Martin’s campaign or spending on ads about Martin are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 2.3% to named individuals, 90% to organizations, 1.7% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 6.3% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Protect Progress | $6.4M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Project 218 | $114.9K |
| Organization · behind Protect Progress | $48.2K |
| Organization · behind Texas Organizing Project PAC | $13.4K |
| Organization · behind Project 218 | $8.9K |
| Person · Attorney, Self-Employed · behind Texas Organizing Project PAC | $8.3K |
The campaign also refunded $2,201 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 44% of all spending | $599,056 |
| 7 payments · 17% of all spending | $228,085 |
| 48 payments · 8.2% of all spending | $110,345 |
| 9 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $63,125 |
| 4 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $58,004 |
| 13 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $51,999 |
| 2 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $24,000 |
| 12 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $21,187 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
Lost · 4,337 votes (5.7%) · 5 of 16 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
The FEC counts someone as a candidate once they raise or spend more than $5,000.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| $45,480 |
| 195 contributions · 17% | $31,316 |
| 123 contributions · 8.5% | $15,614 |
| 112 contributions · 6.3% | $11,515 |
| 33 contributions · 3.7% | $6,855 |
| 21 contributions · 3.6% | $6,610 |
| 45 contributions · 3.3% | $6,087 |
| 37 contributions · 2.9% | $5,365 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 44 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 767 contributions · 43% of ranked | $78,249 |
| Written instead of an employer · 98 contributions · 14% of ranked | $25,254 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $3,310 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,000 |
A further $2,725 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,019,295) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 761 contributions · 43% of ranked | $78,189 |
| 30 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $10,060 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 25 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $6,820 |
| 6 contributions · 3% of ranked | $5,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 14 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $4,220 |
| 13 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $2,750 |
| 8 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $2,425 |
A further $1,100 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,019,295) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Person · Physician, Self-Employed · behind Texas Organizing Project PAC | $7.8K |
| Person · Tech, Anthropic · behind Project 218 | $6.7K |
| Person · Not-Employed · behind Leaders WE Deserve | $6.4K |
| Person · Chair, Pilot House Associates LLC · behind Leaders WE Deserve and Project 218 | $6.3K |
| Organization · behind Texas Organizing Project PAC | $5.1K |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed · behind Leaders WE Deserve | $3.8K |
Read for all 7 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Total itemized disbursements $1,345,202
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
All 433 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
25 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $79,233 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.