Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-09 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, NC-09North Carolina
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Nigel W. Bristow’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Mar 31, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00863019
21¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($1.2K of $5.7K). Cash on hand went from $1.7K on Mar 31, 2025 to $38.5K on Mar 31, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $0 | $0 | $1,685 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $688 | $0 | $688 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $4,851 | $1,195 | $38,284 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $198 | $0 | $38,482 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 2 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.5K.
Total reported receipts $5,737
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Mar 31, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
100% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $4.5K of $4.5K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 100% | $4,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 1 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 67% of ranked | $3,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 33% of ranked | $1,500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 67% of ranked | $3,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 33% of ranked | $1,500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Bristow’s campaign or spending on ads about Bristow are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 17% to named individuals, 26% to organizations, 42% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 14% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $76.7K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $57.5K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $51.3K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $30.8K |
| Person · Retired · behind AB PAC | $20.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC |
No itemized payments
FEC filings through Mar 31, 2026
Not read yet
Lost · 11,824 votes (27%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| $14.1K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $8.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $8K |
| Person · Co-Chief Investment Officer, Bridgewater Associates · behind AB PAC | $4.1K |
| Person · Senior Advisor, Berkshire Partners · behind AB PAC | $4.1K |
| Person · Photographer, Self Employed · behind AB PAC | $4.1K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $3.1K |
Read for the 5 largest groups of 6, 99.9% of the $378.6K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.