Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-29 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-29
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
Luz M. Rivas’ words are not shown
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 13 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Natural Resources
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Rivas’ 16 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00857417
97¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1M of $1M). Cash on hand went from $196.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $296.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $41,352 | $109,263 | $196,352 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $150,289 | $68,838 | $277,803 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $117,748 | $44,610 | $350,941 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $132,273 | $106,811 | $376,403 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $112,070 | $54,105 | $434,368 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $37,746 | $108,259 | $363,856 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $79,200 | $65,579 | $377,476 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $187,823 | $205,488 | $359,812 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $173,974 | $237,636 | $296,150 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
65 endorsers listed on Luz M. Rivas’ own campaign site: 9 parties, 23 officials, 16 unions, 17 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
United States Senator
United states Senator · Rep.
Los Angeles mayor
Former US Representative, 29th District · Rep.
US Representative, 42nd district · Rep.
Lieutenant Governor
Los angeles Councilmember, 6th District · LA Councilmember
Los angeles County supervisor · LA County Supervisor
Congressional Progressive Caucus
“We are proud to endorse Congresswoman Luz Rivas — a progressive champion who has consistently fought for working families and against tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations — to represent California's 29th Congressional District," said CPC PAC Co-Chairs Pramila Jayapal, Greg Casar, and Maxwell Frost. Luz is a true progressive champion and we are proud to support her.”
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Won · 99,017 votes (57%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 750 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $686.8K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 255 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $462.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,032,475
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
58% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $403.2K of $691.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 554 contributions · 58% | $403,217 |
| 39 contributions · 9.1% | $62,708 |
| 31 contributions · 8% | $55,068 |
| 15 contributions · 3.3% | $23,136 |
| 10 contributions · 3% | $21,000 |
| 15 contributions · 2.5% | $17,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2.4% | $16,750 |
| 14 contributions · 2.1% | $14,450 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 26 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 191 contributions · 27% of ranked | $166,349 |
| Written instead of an employer · 113 contributions · 15% of ranked | $91,730 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $7,250 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,600 |
A further $29,006 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,725) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Rivas’s campaign or spending on ads about Rivas are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $4,507 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $992,759
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 426 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
19 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $25,064 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 28% of all spending | $276,508 |
| 8 payments · 27% of all spending | $275,000 |
| 41 payments · 13% of all spending | $133,093 |
| 29 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $73,482 |
| 27 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $55,314 |
| 1 payment · 2.6% of all spending | $25,935 |
| 43 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $20,972 |
| 6 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $14,701 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 191 contributions · 25% of ranked | $166,349 |
| 73 contributions · 11% of ranked | $73,908 |
| 53 contributions · 8% of ranked | $52,797 |
| 25 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $32,250 |
| 35 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $17,378 |
| 10 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $16,950 |
| 15 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $16,250 |
| 8 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $15,342 |
A further $29,006 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,725) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.