Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › OK-05 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, OK-05
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from biceforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Congresswoman Bice authored the “Protecting Military Veteran Families with Disabilities Act,” which was signed into law. She continues to champion legislation that expands veteran access to high-quality healthcare, job training, and education benefits. With over 300,000 veterans in Oklahoma, Bice is helping ensure each of them receives the support and respect they’ve earned.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice is committed to maintaining order at the southern border. She successfully passed an amendment redirecting $25 million in unused Afghan Security Forces funds to the National Guard, bolstering their ability to assist U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Bice supports common-sense immigration reforms and stronger enforcement to protect national security and uphold the rule of law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice has a proven track record of defending our constitutional rights. In Congress, she has opposed unconstitutional mandates and supported legislation that protects freedom of speech, religious liberty, and due process. She is a strong defender of the Second Amendment and continues to oppose efforts that threaten the rights of law- abiding gun owners.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice is working to rein in Washington’s out-of-control spending and bring fiscal responsibility back to the federal government. She introduced legislation to eliminate duplicative federal grant programs and streamline funding across agencies. Bice is a strong supporter of eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in federal programs and continues to push for accountability in how taxpayer dollars are spent.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice is a national leader in the fight to strengthen American energy independence. She supports Oklahoma’s oil and gas industry which is responsible for producing over 10,000 barrels of oil per day and reduces our reliance on hostile foreign nations. Bice opposes regulations that threaten domestic energy production and American jobs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice recognizes agriculture as an essential pillar of Oklahoma’s economy. She supports policies that cut unnecessary regulations, create new opportunities for ag products, and help farmers and ranchers to grow. Bice is proud to be endorsed by the Oklahoma Farm Bureau and continues to advocate for those who feed and fuel the nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice is leading a bipartisan effort in Congress to encourage employers to expand access to paid family leave. Her legislation encourages small businesses to offer this benefit by expanding existing tax credits, helping new parents take time off without financial strain. A mother of two, Bice knows parents shouldn’t have to choose between a paycheck and caring for a newborn or adopted child.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Congresswoman Bice is committed to delivering results for Oklahoma’s Fifth Congressional District. She’s helped over 3,000 constituents resolve issues with federal agencies and continues to cut through burdensome red tape. In Congress, she has introduced 73 bills and co-sponsored 690 more. Bice continues to help constituents navigate the bureaucracy while improving resources that benefit the district.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · biceforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on biceforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens biceforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
House Committee on House Administration
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Bice’s 77 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00703843
98¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.4M of $2.5M). Cash on hand went from $1.3M on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.1M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $355,527 | $125,611 | $1,315,865 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $362,424 | $112,019 | $1,566,271 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $271,453 | $122,273 | $1,715,451 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $143,846 | $119,042 | $1,740,254 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $397,527 | $260,806 | $1,876,974 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 27, 2026 | $133,920 | $141,097 | $1,869,797 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $278,811 | $126,627 | $2,021,981 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $453,644 | $798,836 | $1,676,789 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $79,377 | $632,177 | $1,123,989 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
12 endorsers listed on Stephanie I. Bice’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Won · 130,972 votes (49%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 633 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 951 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $663.6K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 17 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $499K.
Total reported receipts $2,476,529
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
48% of the money placed by state came from inside Oklahoma: $324.4K of $671.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 311 contributions · 48% | $324,448 |
| 160 contributions · 15% | $102,834 |
| 91 contributions · 9.1% | $60,937 |
| 42 contributions · 6.1% | $40,856 |
| 67 contributions · 4.4% | $29,626 |
| 34 contributions · 4.1% | $27,501 |
| 23 contributions · 3.7% | $24,734 |
| 15 contributions · 2.3% | $15,202 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 29 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 460 contributions · 14% of ranked | $87,091 |
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $35,932 |
| 16 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 10 contributions · 2% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,787 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $20,800 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($65,100) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Bice’s campaign or spending on ads about Bice are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 12% to named individuals, 47% to organizations, 28% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.8% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 13% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind League of Labor Voters | $122.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind League of Labor Voters | $36.9K |
| Organization · behind Government That Works PAC and League of Labor Voters | $36.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Government That Works PAC and League of Labor Voters | $31.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind League of Labor Voters | $24.6K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind League of Labor Voters | $20.1K |
| Organization · behind League of Labor Voters | $18.4K |
| Organization · behind Save American Freedom | $18.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Government That Works PAC and League of Labor Voters | $16.7K |
| Organization · behind Government That Works PAC and League of Labor Voters | $16.3K |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · behind Government That Works PAC and League of Labor Voters | $13.3K |
| Organization · behind League of Labor Voters | $9.2K |
Read for the 5 largest groups of 7, 94% of the $618.9K spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $20,461 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $2,266,435
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 956 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
16 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $53,926 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 48% of all spending | $1,158,893 |
| 17 payments · 11% of all spending | $270,949 |
| 22 payments · 4% of all spending | $98,544 |
| 3 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $78,313 |
| 22 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $67,108 |
| 22 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $66,558 |
| 19 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $62,299 |
| 22 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $53,299 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 460 contributions · 13% of ranked | $87,091 |
| 65 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $52,777 |
| 17 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $41,284 |
| 14 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $27,452 |
| 36 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $25,433 |
| 21 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $22,000 |
| 9 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $19,143 |
| 17 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $16,875 |
A further $20,800 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($65,100) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.