Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MI-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MI-04
Representative since 2011
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
5 priorities from huizengaformichigan.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As Washington spending spiraled out of control, Bill led the fight to rein it in. He has consistently pushed for fiscal discipline to combat inflation and lower costs for everyday essentials like energy, groceries, and housing.
Because in Southwest Michigan, families can’t afford Washington’s bad decisions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · huizengaformichigan.com/issues
Bill has supported policies to expand American energy production and reduce dependence on foreign sources, helping bring down energy prices for Michigan families and businesses.
That means lower utility bills, more reliable energy, and a stronger economy across the region.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · huizengaformichigan.com/issues
With deep experience in business and service on the House Financial Services Committee, Bill has worked to remove burdensome regulations and expand access to capital so small businesses can grow and hire.
In a region built on manufacturing, agriculture, and entrepreneurship, that’s not theory, it’s results.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · huizengaformichigan.com/issues
Bill has been a consistent voice for limited government, secure borders, and safe communities. He has stood with law enforcement and supported policies that restore order and protect Michigan families.
Because the priorities of Southwest Michigan shouldn’t take a backseat to Washington politics.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · huizengaformichigan.com/issues
In Congress, Bill has taken on leadership roles focused on accountability, financial oversight, and long-term fiscal responsibility. He has worked across the aisle where it makes sense, while never backing down from core conservative principles.
Bill Huizenga understands Southwest Michigan because he’s from here, built a business here, and raised his family here.
And every day in Congress, he’s fighting to make sure this region remains a place where hard work is rewarded, businesses can thrive, and families can build a better future.
Bill was named Most Effective Member of the Michigan Congressional Delegation in the U.S. House
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · huizengaformichigan.com/issues
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 12 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Huizenga’s 79 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00459297
95¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($5.3M of $5.6M). Cash on hand went from $866K on Mar 31, 2025 to $394.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $857,084 | $100,149 | $865,975 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $746,686 | $230,039 | $1,382,622 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $325,134 | $335,463 | $1,372,293 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $433,833 | $208,113 | $1,598,012 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $634,822 | $335,329 | $1,897,506 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,006,273 | $297,718 | $2,606,060 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $90,160 | $427,474 | $2,268,747 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,273,480 | $1,685,459 | $1,856,768 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $195,304 | $1,657,850 | $394,222 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
1 endorser listed on Bill Huizenga’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 72,143 votes (85%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Lost · 179,484 votes (48%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Public Policy Polling, Nov 21, 2025 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 744 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,619 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 43 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M.
Total reported receipts $5,562,775
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
61% of the money placed by state came from inside Michigan: $1.3M of $2.1M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 899 contributions · 61% | $1,274,709 |
| 784 contributions · 5.6% | $118,162 |
| 507 contributions · 4.9% | $103,605 |
| 179 contributions · 4.1% | $85,204 |
| 1,310 contributions · 3.5% | $72,631 |
| 44 contributions · 2.4% | $51,250 |
| 66 contributions · 2.1% | $43,536 |
| 26 contributions · 1.8% | $37,117 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 46 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 200 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $107,358 |
| 6 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $21,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 39 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $20,879 |
| 4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $17,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $15,333 |
| Written instead of an employer · 35 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $15,195 |
| 6 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $14,499 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $14,260 |
A further $683,988 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($254,043) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Huizenga’s campaign or spending on ads about Huizenga are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 31% to named individuals, 31% to organizations, 26% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 11% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $1.9M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind LCV Victory Fund | $1.3M |
| Organization · behind Michigan Conservative Action | $1.2M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF | $910.6K |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and America PAC and 1 more | $892.4K |
| Person · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · behind HMP and LCV Victory Fund and 2 more | $626.8K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC and HMP | $598.6K |
| Organization · behind Fairshake and Defend American Jobs | $529.5K |
| Person · Director of Community Development, LAS Vegas Sands Corp. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and CLF | $443.6K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind EDF Action Votes | $429.6K |
| Organization · behind Progressive Champions PAC and Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter PAC | $423.8K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $422.7K |
Read for the 20 largest groups of 43, 98% of the $26.5M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $59,850 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $5,221,393
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,280 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
45 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $191,721 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 57% of all spending | $3,016,340 |
| 16 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $386,546 |
| 85 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $275,500 |
| 18 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $237,519 |
| 40 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $206,310 |
| 6 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $115,147 |
| 7 payments · 2% of all spending | $103,300 |
| 3 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $84,885 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,084 contributions · 22% of ranked | $415,541 |
| 119 contributions · 9% of ranked | $169,001 |
| 39 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $104,231 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 26 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $71,000 |
| 41 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $69,229 |
| 35 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $61,091 |
| 120 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $61,000 |
| 44 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $47,213 |
A further $218,026 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($254,043) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.