Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Independent expenditure filer (person or group) › 2025–2026
Environment & climateGroups that state an environmental or climate purpose, such as the political arm of the League of Conservation Voters.CausesPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Independent expenditure filer (person or group)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C90023821 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
No receipts reported
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026
74% to named individuals, 26% to organizations.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Consultant, Self-Employed · Los Angeles, CA · 50% | $100,000 |
| Organization · 25% | $50,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Scalyr · Portola Valley, CA · 15% | $30,000 |
| Person · Rye, NY · 2.5% | $5,000 |
| Person · Product Manager, Self-Employed · San Francisco, CA · 2.5% | $5,000 |
| Organization · 1.3% | $2,500 |
| Person · Co-CEO, Novata · New York, NY · 1% | $2,026 |
| Person · Chief of Staff, Environmental Advocates New York · Brooklyn, NY · 0.6% | $1,192 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 0.5% | $1,000 |
| Person · Lawyer, SAN Francisco City Attorneys Office · San Francisco, CA · 0.5% | $1,000 |
8 smaller sources, $2.2K in all (1.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 95% | $189,700 |
| 13 contributions · 4.5% | $9,014 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $209 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $203 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $4,749
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Notices dated after Sep 30, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Climate Leadership Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as an independent expenditure filer (person or group). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 71% of ranked | $105,000 |
| 1 contribution · 20% of ranked | $30,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $6,796 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $2,026 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $1,192 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $412 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% of ranked | $250 |
A further $53,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 68% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 1 contribution · 20% of ranked | $30,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 11 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $6,796 |
| 1 contribution · 3.4% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $2,026 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $1,192 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $703 |
A further $52,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $4,723
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 68 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 12 payments | $1,615 |
| 4 payments | $1,192 |
| 6 payments | $195 |
| 4 payments | $190 |
| 2 payments | $180 |
| 2 payments | $169 |
| 2 payments | $134 |
| 2 payments | $110 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.