FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00948984 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$2.1M raised, $1.9M spent, $152.2K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
96% filed as other receipts · largest donor Simone Coxe, $1.2M. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,075,342 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,982,52896%
Where it came from
Simone Coxe3 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · WEST LAKE HILLS, TX$1,163,000
Legacy 441 receipt, latest Aug 18, 2026 · Austin, Texas$25,000
John JaggersOne contribution on Aug 31, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · DALLAS, TX$15,000
Austin LigonOne contribution on Sep 4, 2026 · INFORMATION REQUESTED · AUSTIN, TX$15,000
Dee Ann PayneOne contribution on Oct 8, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · DALLAS, TX$15,000
Kimberley EltingOne contribution on Sep 11, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · DALLAS, TX$5,000
Jenny EverettOne contribution on Aug 27, 2026 · SOCIAL IMPACT ADVISOR · SELF EMPLOYED · AUSTIN, TX$5,000
Myron F. SteveOne contribution on Jul 30, 2026 · INFORMATION REQUESTED · HOUSTON, TX$2,500
Scot WhiteOne contribution on Oct 3, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · MCKINNEY, TX$2,500
Donald Henley2 contributions, latest Oct 2, 2026 · MUSICIAN · SELF EMPLOYED · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA$2,000
Mary Cook2 contributions, latest Oct 1, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · DALLAS, TX$1,100
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $770K from 5 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$56,8332.7%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$35,9801.7%
Total reported receipts $2,075,342
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2.1M followed back through up to 3 committees
60% to named individuals, 34% to organizations, 1.5% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 4.3% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.9M 93%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Simone CoxePerson · Retired · West Lake Hills, TX · also behind 1 other group · 56%
$1,163,000
Syzygy Obelix LLCOrganization · 24%
$500,000
Texas House Democratic Campaign CommitteeOrganization · 5.8%
$120,000
Not itemized by this committee2.8%
$59,092
Fair Shot Texas PACOrganization · 1.2%
$25,000
Legacy 44Organization · 1.2%
$25,000
John JaggersPerson · Dallas, TX · 0.7%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,747,480 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $49.5K
$49.5K+
$197.8K+
$445.1K+
$791.3K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Texas42 contributions · 71%
$1,236,340
Washington1 contribution · 29%
$500,000
Virginia3 contributions · 0.1%
$2,300
Colorado2 contributions · 0.1%
$2,000
California7 contributions · <0.1%
$1,285
Georgia2 contributions · <0.1%
$1,005
Florida1 contribution · <0.1%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,923,142 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,833,37895%
Paid to
Dunn for Texas3 payments · latest Oct 14, 2026 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: CONTRIBUTION TO A NON FEDERAL COMMITTEE$175,000
Lake Research Partners9 payments · latest Sep 3, 2026 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH SURVEY$151,500
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$1,059<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,923,142
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,921,649 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,918,05099.8%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: CONTRIBUTION TO A NON FEDERAL COMMITTEE$938,522
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: SURVEY RESEARCH$301,500
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH SURVEY$151,500
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: DIGITAL ADVERTISING AND FEES$150,000
$1.9M spent from May 2026 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$1.9M
May 2026Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$781,981
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$1,141,156
May 1 – Jun 30, 2026$5
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
1150 N LOOP 1604 WSTE 108-230SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78248
Audits and penalties
None published by the FEC
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
No lobbying disclosures matched
A name search for “BLUEPRINT TEXAS” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$15,000
Austin LigonPerson · Austin, TX · 0.7%
$15,000
Dee Ann PaynePerson · Retired · Dallas, TX · 0.7%
$15,000
Through The PAC for America's Future$52K 2.5%
Through The PAC for America's Future
Name
Amount
Not itemized by The PAC for America's Future1.3%
$27,602
Future Now ActionOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.2%
$24,349
156 smaller sources, $86.3K in all (4.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$1,000
Maryland5 contributions · <0.1%
$800
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 44 contributions · 99% of ranked
$1,215,385
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$9,335
Ranson Properties1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Spark Consulting1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Tommyrun1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Propercare5 contributions · <0.1% of ranked
$500
Bohannon Development Company2 contributions · <0.1% of ranked
$260
Cisco1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$250
A further $517,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($56,833) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 7 contributions · 96% of ranked
$1,180,250
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 37 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$35,135
Social Impact Advisor1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked
$5,000
Musician2 contributions · 0.2% of ranked
$2,000
Attorney3 contributions · 0.1% of ranked
$1,260
Founder1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Marketing1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Real Estate Broker1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
A further $517,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($56,833) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee
$150,000
Katie for Texas$150,000
Josh Wallenstein Campaign$150,000
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$3,5990.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$3,599
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$3,599
Total itemized disbursements $1,921,649
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 73 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Dunn for Texas3 payments · 9.1% of all spending
$175,000
Texas Democratic Party3 payments · 8.2% of all spending
$158,522
Lake Research Partners9 payments · 7.9% of all spending
$151,500
Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee1 payment · 7.8% of all spending
$150,000
Katie for Texas2 payments · 7.8% of all spending
$150,000
Josh Wallenstein Campaign3 payments · 7.8% of all spending
$150,000
Compete Digital LLC1 payment · 7.8% of all spending
$150,000
Stephanie Guerrero Saenz Campaign3 payments · 6.5% of all spending
$125,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Dunn for Texas3 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: CONTRIBUTION TO A NON FEDERAL COMMITTEE$175K
Lake Research Partners9 payments, latest Sep 3, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH SURVEY$151.5K