Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
Democratic & progressive groupsOn the Democratic side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A caucus’s PAC is here. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
92% of its money came through Blue Majority Project, placed under Other political groups. Behind that: Alan Blumenthal (Investor, Blue Wolf Capital), William H. Harris (Retired) and others. See where the money traces to
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Washington, District of ColumbiaInactive
FEC filings through May 9, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00934273 · files terminated
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Total reported receipts $26,000
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through May 9, 2026.
38% to named individuals, 38% to organizations, 1.3% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 4.8% to committees we could not follow, 19% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Investor, Blue Wolf Capital · New York, NY · 12% | $3,211 |
| Person · Retired · Lexington, MA · also behind 5 other groups · 11% | $2,783 |
| Person · Retired · Rancho Mirage, CA · 6.8% | $1,777 |
| Organization · 4.1% | $1,070 |
| Organization · 4.1% | $1,070 |
| Person · President, Xwpharma Ltd · South San Francisco, CA · 3.3% | $856 |
| 1.9% | $493 |
| Organization · 1.6% | $428 |
| Person · Attorney, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney · Washington, DC · also behind 1 other group · 1.6% | $428 |
| Organization · 0.8% | $214 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 0.8% | $214 |
| Organization · 0.8% | $214 |
| Organization · 0.8% | $214 |
| Organization · 0.8% | $214 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $150 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $150 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 8.3% | $2,155 |
| 3.1% | $803 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $166 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10% | $2,710 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 8.6% | $2,232 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.1% | $551 |
| Committee, not followed further · Other political groups (proposed) · 1.1% | $276 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Committee, not followed further · 1.9% | $482 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $160 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Committee, not followed further · Other political groups (proposed) · 1.2% | $303 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.1% | $279 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $190 |
278 smaller sources, $2.2K in all (8.5%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $26,000
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through May 9, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements
$26K spent from Jan 2026 to May 2026. Most in one report: $25.7K, April 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through May 9, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Democratic Future PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through May 9, 2026.
All 20 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 18 payments · 87% of all spending | $22,650 |
| 2 payments · 13% of all spending | $3,350 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.