FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00901769 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$101.6K raised, $96.6K spent, $5K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
98% filed as other receipts · largest donor Laurel Roth, $6K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
Arsenal PACHybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to TRANS LIBERTY PAC · 1 payment
$2K
$2K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $101,551 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$99,50698%
Meow2 receipts, latest Jun 26, 2026 · New York, New York$165
The 14 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.7K from 3 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$2,0002%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$45<0.1%
Total reported receipts $101,551
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Where the money traces to $101.6K followed back through up to 3 committees
41% to named individuals, 4.7% to organizations, 54% not itemized.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$2<0.1%
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services2 payments · latest Jun 30, 2026 · ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, APRIL QUARTERLY 2026$2
Total reported disbursements $96,579
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $91,894 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$28,26731%
Filed as
STAFFING & TECHNICAL SERVICES$28,267
Paid to
Coalition Operations LAB Co.$28,267
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$22,80025%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION TO TRANS LIBERTY INC. (501C4)$17,153
IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION TO TRANS LIBERTY INC. (501C4)$2,134
Spending over time
$96.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $46.7K, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
$96.6K
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$29,847
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$46,706
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$13,336
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$6,631
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$58
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “TRANS LIBERTY” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
David CarterPerson · Scientist, UC Riverside · Redlands, CA · 0.5%
$535
Sandy SandersPerson · Lawrence, KS · 0.5%
$515
Joshua R. TranPerson · Scientist, BMS · Everett, MA · 0.5%
$510
29 smaller sources, $11.3K in all (11%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$3,515
Oregon8 contributions · 3.5%
$1,875
New Hampshire6 contributions · 3.4%
$1,850
Washington13 contributions · 2.5%
$1,350
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 141 contributions · 54% of ranked
$26,614
UC Denver2 contributions · 12% of ranked
$6,000
Morrison Foerster1 contribution · 5.1% of ranked
$2,500
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 4.6% of ranked
$2,250
Mckinsey1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
Nist1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
Winifred Dooley2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$750
UC Riverside16 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$535
A further $4,447 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($45) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 141 contributions · 52% of ranked
$26,614
Instructor2 contributions · 12% of ranked
$6,000
Lawyer1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked
$2,500
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$1,700
Scientist17 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$1,045
Consultant1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
Performing Artist1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
Physicist1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
A further $2,747 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($45) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 (NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT)$1,246
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, JULY QUARTERLY 2026 (NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT)$1,215
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 (NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT)$1,051
Paid to
Trans Liberty Inc.$17,153
ActBlue Technical Services$3,512
U-Haul$805
Johnson County Wastewater$311
Harvard Business Services$304
Amazon$267
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$14,34016%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$10,366
FUNDRAISING COMMISSIONS$2,168
TEXT MESSAGE FUNDRAISING$1,701
DONOR RESEARCH SERVICES$74
EVENT SUPPLIES$31
Paid to
C2G Strategies LLC$10,366
Ground Floor Political$3,869
Grassroots Analytics, Inc.$74
Amazon$31
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$10,92312%
Filed as
TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$7,114
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION AND USAGE$3,122
EMAIL MARKETING$523
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION$164
Paid to
Switchboard PBC$7,114
Anthropic$3,122
Action Network$523
Slack$141
Elevenlabs$23
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$9,39610%
Filed as
TRAVEL: AIRFARE$5,255
TRAVEL: LODGING$4,110
TRAVEL: TOLLS$32
Paid to
Southwest Airlines$1,944
Airbnb$1,676
Frontier Airlines$1,553
Marriott International$1,342
Delta Air Lines$690
American Airlines$573
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$2,1382.3%
Filed as
MARKETING: SOCIAL MEDIA$1,484
MEDIA ASSETS SUBSCRIPTION$654
Paid to
X Corp$1,484
Storyblocks$654
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$2,0562.2%
Filed as
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION (PROCESSED VIA PAYPAL)$1,047
REIMBURSEMENT$478
VEHICLE RENTAL$314
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT$216
ACCOUNT VERIFICATION REVERSAL$1
Paid to
Sciinov Group$1,047
The Needle$478
Enterprise Rent-a-Car$314
Rosenzweig, Vasilios$216
Opengov HUB$1
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$1,4801.6%
Filed as
OFFICE SPACE DUES$1,480
Paid to
Opengov HUB$1,480
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$2500.3%
Filed as
TECHNICAL CONSULTING$250
Paid to
Shire Civics Co.$250
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$2450.3%
Filed as
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, YEAR-END 2025$243
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, APRIL QUARTERLY 2026$1
ACTBLUE PROCESSING FEES, JULY QUARTERLY 2026$0
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$245
Total itemized disbursements $91,894
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 145 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Coalition Operations LAB Co.9 payments · 29% of all spending
$28,267
Trans Liberty Inc.5 payments · 18% of all spending
$17,153
C2G Strategies LLC16 payments · 11% of all spending
$10,366
Switchboard PBC7 payments · 7.4% of all spending
$7,114
Ground Floor Political4 payments · 4% of all spending
$3,869
ActBlue Technical Services6 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$3,757
Anthropic18 payments · 3.2% of all spending
$3,122
Southwest Airlines5 payments · 2% of all spending
$1,944
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.