Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
59% of its money came through Denali Leadership PAC, placed under Politicians' PACs. See where the money traces to
PAC (nonqualified)Joint fundraiserWashington, District of ColumbiaInactive
FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00900720 · files terminated
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MURKOWSKI · 2 payments | $300 |
$300 from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Total reported receipts $300
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
37% to named individuals, 14% to organizations, 4.4% to committees we could not follow, 44% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.6% | $8 |
| Organization · 1.5% | $4 |
| Organization · 1.5% | $4 |
| Person · Founder, Pivotal Ventures · Redmond, WA · 1.5% | $4 |
| Person · Energy Executive, ECA Power · Nashua, NH · 1.5% | $4 |
| Organization · 1.5% | $4 |
| Person · Retired · Ketchum, ID · 1.5% | $4 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $3 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $3 |
| Person · CEO, Ceba · Washington, DC · 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Co-Founder, Arnold Ventures · Houston, TX · also behind 2 other groups · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Co-Founder, Arnold Ventures · Houston, TX · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · CEO, Arcadia Science · Berkeley, CA · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Trader, Self Employed · Forest Hills, NY · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Founder/managing Partner, Clearpath · Charlotte, NC · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Founder/managing Partner, Clearpath · Charlotte, NC · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Committee, not followed further · 1.2% | $4 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $3 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $2 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $2 |
4918 smaller sources, $123 in all (41%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $300
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $210
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
All 1 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 70% of all spending | $210 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$300 spent from Mar 2025 to Dec 2025. Most in one report: $270, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Spark Climate Solutions pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $866.2K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “SPARK CLIMATE SOLUTIONS”, found by searching “CLIMATE SOLUTIONS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Friends of Climate Solutions is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $2 |
| Person · Management, Potawatomi Business Development Corp · Anchorage, AK · 0.7% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Founder, Vast · Berkeley, CA · 0.7% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · Technology Manager, Jane Street Capital · New York, NY · 0.7% | $2 |
| Person · CEO, Current Strategies · Washington, DC · 0.6% | $2 |
| Person · Lobbyist, Acorn Consulting · Washington, DC · 0.5% | $2 |
| Person · Policy Director, Secure AI Project · Berkeley, CA · 0.5% | $2 |
| Person · VP, Sause Bros · Portland, OR · 0.5% | $2 |
| Organization · 0.5% | $2 |