Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00895730 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$950.7K raised, $889K spent, $61.7K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
78% from donors giving $200 or less · 15% filed as other receipts · largest donor Adelaide Gomer, $7.5K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$88.3K spent for candidates, most on PA-07 ($88.3K) · $15K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Peggy Flanagan ($7K) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Not yet reviewed.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$103.3K to 7 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $103,322
Democratic 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$15,000 in 8 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
6
$15K · 100%
All recipients
6
$15K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Minnesota
1
$7K
Illinois
1
$2.5K
Pennsylvania
1
$2.5K
New Jersey
1
$1K
Hawaii
1
$1K
Kentucky
1
$1K
Recipients 6
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Margaret Flanagan3 receipts, latest Sep 21, 2026Peggy Flanagan for Minnesota · S6MN00440$7K
Juliana Stratton1 receipt, latest Jun 9, 2025Juliana for Illinois · S6IL00458$2.5K
Cherlynn Stevenson1 receipt, latest Dec 2, 2025Cherlynn for Congress · H6KY06150$1K
Tahesha Way1 receipt, latest Dec 3, 2025Way for Congress · H6NJ11310$1K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $950,677 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$744,96278%
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$142,30015%
Where it came from
Dlga2 receipts, latest Sep 1, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$100,000
Dlga PAC1 receipt, latest Jan 27, 2025 · Washington, District of Columbia$25,000
The 2 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $125K from 2 sources in all.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$56,8146%
Largest donors
Adelaide Gomer2 contributions, latest Aug 2, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · ITHACA, NY$7,500
Jeff TzengOne contribution on Nov 24, 2025 · SELF EMPLOYED · RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA$5,000
Fred IlfeldOne contribution on Dec 21, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · OLYMPIC VALLEY, CA$4,000
Deb WickershamOne contribution on Nov 21, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · ROSEVILLE, CA$3,000
Michael Myette7 contributions, latest Sep 7, 2026 · PHYSICIAN · KAISER PERMANENTE · GRANITE BAY, CA$2,300
Thomas QuinnOne contribution on Jan 6, 2026 · PHYSICIAN · SUTTER HEALTH · OAKLAND, CA$2,000
Donald Crawford7 contributions, latest Jul 5, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · NONE · SAN DIEGO, CA$1,750
Sarah Gsle90 contributions, latest Feb 15, 2026 · FULTON, TX$1,390
Patricia Fleming9 contributions, latest Jun 21, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · CHARLESTON, SC$1,225
Bernadette Senn23 contributions, latest Jun 14, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · SUNSET BEACH, CA$1,099
Mary DetmeringOne contribution on Aug 4, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · HOUSTON, TX$1,000
Barbara Garrett4 contributions, latest Sep 22, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · CORAL GABLES, FL$1,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,161 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $73.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$6,6000.7%
Committees that gave
Hold the Line1 receipt, latest May 20, 2025 · Pac (qualified)$1,600
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $950,677
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Where the money traces to $950.7K followed back through up to 3 committees
7.3% to named individuals, 6.8% to organizations, 2.2% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 83% not itemized.
Gave directly$779.4K 82%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee81%
$766,868
Adelaide GomerPerson · Ithaca, NY · 0.8%
$7,500
Jeff TzengPerson · Self Employed · Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 0.5%
$5,000
Through Dlga PACDemocratic & progressive groups$34.1K 3.6%
Through Dlga PAC
Name
Amount
Forward Movement FoundationOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.4%
$13,151
Not itemized by Dlga PAC0.8%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $76,881 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.2K
$1.2K+
$4.6K+
$10.4K+
$18.5K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California196 contributions · 38%
$28,940
New York29 contributions · 13%
$10,039
Texas161 contributions · 6.9%
$5,273
Massachusetts84 contributions · 4.8%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $888,983 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$621,30670%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$9,2771%
Total reported disbursements $888,983
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $878,052 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$534,00261%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING & TEXT MESSAGING$402,212
TEXTING AND LIST RENTAL$92,811
FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT$35,979
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$3,000
Paid to
SB Digital, Inc$405,212
Bluebird Technologies LLC$92,811
Mothership Strategies$35,979
Spending over time
$889K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $278.9K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$889K
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$278,941
Apr 30 – Jun 30, 2026$40,672
Apr 1 – Apr 29, 2026$77,186
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$178,086
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$148,385
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$165,713
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
This committee’s name carries no organization we could search for in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Bars drawn to $7K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$15K across 6 recipient committees, or 1.7% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$7,520
Democratic Lieutenant Governors Association IncOrganization · 0.7%
$6,675
Then Stop Project 2025Other political groups (proposed)$6.7K 0.7%
Then Stop Project 2025
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Stop Project 20250.7%
$6,728
549 smaller sources, $132.3K in all (14%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$3,685
Florida71 contributions · 3.5%
$2,660
New Jersey23 contributions · 2.9%
$2,192
Virginia48 contributions · 2.8%
$2,144
Illinois41 contributions · 2.5%
$1,932
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 960 contributions · 72% of ranked
$51,014
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 44 contributions · 12% of ranked
$8,184
Kaiser Permanente7 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$2,300
Sutter Health1 contribution · 2.8% of ranked
$2,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 21 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$852
SWLF11 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$550
University Of Chicago2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked
$515
CBS1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$500
A further $5,840 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($744,962) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 976 contributions · 72% of ranked
$52,905
Self-employedWritten instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked
$5,000
Physician13 contributions · 6.4% of ranked
$4,735
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 42 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$1,307
Attorney4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$1,100
Writer5 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$610
Realtor13 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$579
Psychotherapist11 contributions · 0.7% of ranked
$550
A further $3,072 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($744,962) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Printing, mail, and shipping
Printed literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.
$88.3K of it was independent spending for Bob Brooks
$130,35815%
Filed as
PRINTING AND POSTAGEIndependent spending: $88.3K in support of Bob Brooks$130,358
Paid to
Agmv Campaigns LLCIndependent spending in support of Bob Brooks$88,322
Forest Printing Co.$42,037
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$58,5006.7%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$38,500
NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$20,000
Paid to
Sarah for Wisconsin$20,000
Virginia House Democratic Caucus$7,500
Peggy Flanagan for Minnesota$7,000
Friends of MAY Nivar$5,000
Carnegie for Delegate$3,000
Leslie Mehta for Delegate$2,500
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$49,9995.7%
Filed as
MEDIA BUY$49,999
Paid to
DK Strategies LLC$49,999
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$43,5085%
Filed as
SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION$24,906
TEXTING$11,924
SUBSCRIPTION$6,678
Paid to
Everyaction, Inc$21,306
Circuit Texting, LLC$11,924
Action Squared$6,678
Integrated Solutions: Political$3,600
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$32,1003.7%
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$29,5853.4%
Filed as
COMPLIANCE & ACCOUNTING SERVICES$20,260
WEBSITE DESIGN CONSULTANT$8,400
GRAPHIC DESIGN CONSULTANT$925
Paid to
Common Cents Consulting$20,260
Apollo Artistry$8,400
Tricia Cavell LLC$925
Total itemized disbursements $878,052
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 237 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
SB Digital, Inc23 payments · 46% of all spending
$405,212
Bluebird Technologies LLC3 payments · 10% of all spending
$92,811
Agmv Campaigns LLC6 payments · 9.9% of all spending
$88,322
DK Strategies LLC1 payment · 5.6% of all spending
$49,999
Forest Printing Co.1 payment · 4.7% of all spending
$42,037
Mothership Strategies3 payments · 4% of all spending
$35,979
ActBlue Technical Services106 payments · 3.6% of all spending
$31,753
Everyaction, Inc3 payments · 2.4% of all spending
$21,306
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
