$1.7M raised, $1.6M spent, $61.6K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
65% from donors giving $200 or less · 23% filed as other receipts · largest donor Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund, $265K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“Fields of Change PAC supports bold, progressive candidates running for state and local office. From school boards to city halls to state legislatures, we invest in the next generation of leaders who are ready to take on extremism and deliver for their communities.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$67K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,679,943 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,092,30865%
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$394,02823%
Where it came from
Local Jobs & Economic Development Fund2 receipts, latest Jun 9, 2025 · Wilmington, Delaware$265,000
Joe Gamez Law Firm2 receipts, latest May 28, 2025 · San Antonio, Texas$45,000
SB Digital1 receipt, latest Apr 18, 2025 · Washington, District of Columbia$20,000
Travis StewartOne contribution on Mar 1, 2026 · BUSINESS OWNER · THE DRAVIS AGENCY · VALLEY VILLAGE, CA$10,000
Andrew Erdman3 contributions, latest Mar 22, 2026 · SACRAMENTO, CA$7,035
Ben BarnesOne contribution on May 12, 2025 · CONSULTANT · BEN BARNES GROUP · AUSTIN, TX$5,000
Shekar NarasimhanOne contribution on May 4, 2025 · ADVISOR · BEEKMAN ADVISORS INC. · DUNN LORING, VA$5,000
Alexandra RosenOne contribution on Aug 10, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · SAN JOSE, CA$2,515
Karen Burtness Prak125 contributions, latest Sep 29, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · MENLO PARK, CA$2,402
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 8 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,913 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $510.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$67,0004%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$1,000<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,679,943
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $1.7M followed back through up to 3 committees
7% to named individuals, 21% to organizations, 72% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.5M 92%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee68%
$1,147,628
Local Jobs & Economic Development FundOrganization · 16%
$265,000
Joe Gamez Law FirmOrganization · 2.7%
$45,000
Michael HilesPerson · President, Field Management Services · Los Angeles, CA · 1.5%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$89,7825.5%
Paid to
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$22,2311.4%
Total reported disbursements $1,618,298
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,595,167 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$1,214,97276%
Filed as
DIGITAL CONSULTING$553,958
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING$412,500
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$122,264
STRATEGY CONSULTING$50,000
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$40,250
GENERAL CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$30,000
GENERAL STRATEGY CONSULTING$6,000
Paid to
SB Digital$546,458
Asana Consulting Services Inc.$145,000
Overmountain Strategies
Spending over time
$1.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $557.3K, Jan 13 – Jun 30, 2025.
$1.6M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$9,425
September 2026$144,608
August 2026$97,313
July 2026$87,163
June 2026$58,507
May 2026$46,792
April 2026$62,958
March 2026$63,549
February 2026$73,559
January 2026$84,644
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$332,476
Jan 13 – Jun 30, 2025$557,303
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “FIELDS OF CHANGE” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Fields of Change PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Editorially reviewed organization match
Match confidence
low
Source coverage
Official pages captured
15
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
Travis StewartPerson · Business Owner, The Dravis Agency · Valley Village, CA · 0.6%
$10,000
Through Hold the LineCivil rights & justice (voting rights, LGBTQ, criminal justice, tribal nations) (proposed)$64K 3.8%
Through Hold the Line
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Hold the Line3.8%
$63,974
98 smaller sources, $69.8K in all (4.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$20,765
Virginia96 contributions · 1.6%
$8,229
Illinois111 contributions · 1.5%
$7,707
New York256 contributions · 1.3%
$6,787
Colorado116 contributions · 1.2%
$6,395
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 2,628 contributions · 50% of ranked
$80,936
Field Management Services2 contributions · 16% of ranked
$25,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 114 contributions · 15% of ranked
$23,687
The Dravis Agency1 contribution · 6.2% of ranked
$10,000
Beekman Advisors INC1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$5,000
BEN Barnes Group1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$5,000
Starker Forests18 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$1,800
Donald Henley1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked
$1,000
A further $362,683 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,092,308) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 2,487 contributions · 48% of ranked
$77,510
President16 contributions · 16% of ranked
$25,485
Investor5 contributions · 8.6% of ranked
$13,750
Business Owner1 contribution · 6.2% of ranked
$10,000
Advisor2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$5,250
Consultant1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$5,000
Attorney16 contributions · 2% of ranked
$3,213
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 136 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$2,992
A further $362,613 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,092,308) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Hannah Pingree for Governor1 payment · latest Jun 3, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION TO NON-FEDERAL COMMITTEE$2,000
Shonna for Floyd1 payment · latest Mar 6, 2025 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$1,000
Dontaye Carter for Mayor Sandy Springs2 payments · latest Nov 26, 2025 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$1,000
$137,500
Ampersand Strategies LLC$130,000
AMS Communications Inc$122,264
Brackish Solutions LLC$50,000
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$161,42710%
Filed as
LIST ACQUISITION$94,865
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$66,562
Paid to
SB Digital$148,693
Circuit Texting$7,734
TKO Strategy Group$5,000
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$89,3535.6%
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - GENERAL CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$5,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - MERCHANT FEES$395
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BANK FEES$208
Paid to
Ampersand Strategies LLC$22,500
Asana Consulting Services Inc.$16,000
Acuity Politics LLC$10,250
Fields of Change Georgia$10,000
Georgia for Jason$8,000
Mountain Lake Advisors$5,000
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$60,7243.8%
Filed as
ADVERTISING$60,724
Paid to
SB Digital$60,724
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$50,1193.1%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEES$47,792
BANK FEES$2,328
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$47,792
Amalgamated Bank$2,328
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$10,0000.6%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL SERVICES$10,000
Paid to
Mission Control, Inc$10,000
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$6,5000.4%
Filed as
RESEARCH CONSULTING$6,500
Paid to
Stanford Campaigns$6,500
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$1,9880.1%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$1,410
SUBSCRIPTIONS$498
SUBSCRIPTION$80
Paid to
Intuit$1,034
NGP VAN$955
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$84<0.1%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION REFUND$84
Paid to
Bettencourt, Jeanne$60
Macdonald, Bruce$24
Total itemized disbursements $1,595,167
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 305 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
SB Digital38 payments · 47% of all spending
$755,874
Asana Consulting Services Inc.22 payments · 9.9% of all spending
$161,000
Ampersand Strategies LLC13 payments · 9.4% of all spending
$152,500
Overmountain Strategies11 payments · 8.5% of all spending
$137,500
AMS Communications Inc3 payments · 7.6% of all spending
$122,264
Acuity Politics LLC21 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$50,500
Brackish Solutions LLC10 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$50,000
ActBlue Technical Services108 payments · 3% of all spending
$48,187
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.