Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00893230 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to LICCARDO VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $7K |
$7K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to LICCARDO VICTORY FUND · 18 payments | $1.3M |
| PAC (qualified) · 16 payments | $314.9K |
$1.6M across 2 recipient committees, or 95% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 371 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.7M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,665,500
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
35% to named individuals, 65% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 64% | $1,074,100 |
| Person · Retired · Portola Valley, CA · 1% | $16,600 |
| Person · Retired · Portola Valley, CA · 1% | $16,600 |
| Person · Retired · Menlo Park, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · CEO, Give Forward Foundation · Woodside, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Chairman, Legacy Partners · Foster City, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Business Owner, MVC Solutions · Sausalito, CA · 0.7% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 340 contributions · 92% | $1,531,500 |
| 5 contributions · 1.5% | $24,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% | $23,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% | $21,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.1% | $17,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,711,978
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.4M, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Liccardo Victory Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $12,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Cotchett, Pitre & Mccarthy LLP · Burlingame, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Vice President & General Manager, Broadcom · Los Altos, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Google · Burlingame, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Business Owner, Learn and Play Montessori School · Fremont, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Business Owner, Learn and Play Montessori School · Fremont, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Los Altos Hills, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Computer Scientist, Openai · Los Altos Hills, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Business Owner, Self-Employed · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Venture Capital, Greylock · Anacortes, WA · also behind 22 other groups · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · CEO, Synaptics · Saratoga, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Engineer, Synaptics · Saratoga, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Managing Director, Kemp AU Ventures · Menlo Park, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Co-Founder, Chime Financial, Inc. · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Santa Clara, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · CEO, Plusai, Inc. · Los Altos, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Retired · Portola Valley, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Portola Valley, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Wealth Management, WRP · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Oracle · San Jose, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Real Estate, Self-Employed · Palo Alto, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Rothbard Law · Santa Clara, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Woodside, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Retired · Woodside, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Venture Capitalist, Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC · Palo Alto, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Retired · Monte Sereno, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Monte Sereno, CA · 0.7% | $12,000 |
| Person · Homemaker · Woodside, CA · 0.7% | $11,600 |
| Person · Business Owner, Xapo · Woodside, CA · 0.7% | $11,600 |
| Person · Retired · Los Altos Hills, CA · 0.7% | $11,000 |
| Person · Retired · Los Altos Hills, CA · 0.7% | $11,000 |
| Person · Founder & Chairman, Marcus & Millichap Co. · Palo Alto, CA · also behind 4 other groups · 0.6% | $10,000 |
| Person · Private Equity Advisor, CSP Associates Inc · Cambridge, MA · 0.6% | $10,000 |
| Person · Environmental Director, KO Olina · Woodside, CA · 0.6% | $10,000 |
| Person · Vice President & General Manager, Outokumpu Stainless Plate, LLC · Chicago, IL · 0.6% | $10,000 |
| Person · Research Engineer, Anthropic PBC · San Francisco, CA · 0.5% | $9,000 |
| Person · Engineer, Google · Saratoga, CA · 0.5% | $8,500 |
| Person · Strategy, Google · San Francisco, CA · 0.5% | $8,500 |
53 smaller sources, $13.4K in all (0.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% | $10,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 106 contributions · 33% of ranked | $550,400 |
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $96,850 |
| 8 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $59,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $20,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $15,500 |
A further $7,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($550) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 61 contributions · 17% of ranked | $287,750 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 34 contributions · 13% of ranked | $212,450 |
| 29 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $130,000 |
| 28 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $108,550 |
| 18 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $76,000 |
| 9 contributions · 4% of ranked | $67,100 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 11 contributions · 3% of ranked | $50,200 |
| 6 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $36,000 |
A further $7,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($550) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,704,202
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 135 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 18 payments · 76% of all spending | $1,304,854 |
| 16 payments · 18% of all spending | $314,901 |
| 58 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $61,107 |
| 4 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $20,150 |
| 22 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $2,390 |
| 17 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $800 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.