Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$8.6M to 5 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $8,551,959
Independent 91%
Against candidates $150,000
Democratic 100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $8,761,668 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$8,759,76899.9%
Where it came from
Richard Masson2 contributions, latest Sep 22, 2026 · NETWORK OPERATIONS DIRECTOR · THE CIGNA GROUP · MONROE, CT$3,000,000
Americans Together3 receipts, latest Oct 13, 2026 · FAIRMONT, West Virginia$1,600,000
Ronald BurkleOne contribution on Sep 9, 2026 · MANAGING PARTNER · THE YUCAIPA COMPANIES · LOS ANGELES, CA$1,000,000
David SokolOne contribution on Aug 16, 2026 · CHAIRMAN · TETON CAPITAL LLC · ARLINGTON, TX$1,000,000
Independent Center Voice3 receipts, latest Oct 8, 2026 · ALEXANDRIA, Virginia$690,000
Bill AddyOne contribution on Sep 15, 2026 · CHAIRMAN · ISN SOFTWARE · DALLAS, TX$500,000
Lydia AddyOne contribution on Sep 15, 2026 · DIRECTOR · EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS · DALLAS, TX$500,000
Shari RedstoneOne contribution on Sep 29, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS · WESTWOOD, MA$250,000
Chris RuferOne contribution on Sep 28, 2026 · AGRICULTURALIST · THE MORNING STAR COMPANY · WOODLAND, CA$100,000
Luke WilliamsOne contribution on Aug 24, 2026 · MANAGING DIRECTOR · OAK TREE DEVELOPMENT · EAST HAVEN, CT$99,652
Andrea ImmeltOne contribution on Oct 7, 2026 · RETIRED · NEW CANAAN, CT$7,500
Jeffrey ImmeltOne contribution on Oct 7, 2026 · RETIRED · NEW CANAAN, CT$7,500
The 12 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.3M from 2 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,250<0.1%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$650<0.1%
Total reported receipts $8,761,668
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $8.8M followed back through up to 3 committees
74% to named individuals, 26% to organizations.
Gave directly$8.7M 99.7%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Richard MassonPerson · Network Operations Director, The Cigna Group · Monroe, CT · 34%
$3,000,000
Americans TogetherOrganization · 18%
$1,600,000
Ronald BurklePerson · Managing Partner, The Yucaipa Companies · Los Angeles, CA · 11%
$1,000,000
David SokolPerson · Chairman, Teton Capital LLC · Arlington, TX · 11%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $8,349,111 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$7.6M of it was independent spending for Seth Bodnar and for Kevin Kiley and 4 more$8,349,01899.9%
Filed as
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: MEDIA PLACEMENT / MEDIA PRODUCTIONIndependent spending: $3.6M in support of Seth Bodnar · $140.3K in support of Michael Bridgford and 1 more$3,891,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: DOOR-TO-DOOR GOTV / PRINTINGIndependent spending: $1.6M in support of Seth Bodnar · $800K in support of Kevin Kiley$2,350,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS / MEDIA CONSULTING$702,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: GOTV VOTER OUTREACHIndependent spending: $430K in support of Seth Bodnar · $110K in support of Christopher Roman Getty
Spending over time
$8.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $7.5M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$8.3M1
Jan 2025Nov 2026
1Nov 3, 2026 general election, CA-06, MT-SEN$7.1M of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$870,157
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$7,479,268
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$42
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$42
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$77
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$0
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “INDEPENDENT” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$500,000
Shari RedstonePerson · Executive, National Amusements · Westwood, MA · 2.9%
$250,000
Chris RuferPerson · Agriculturalist, The Morning Star Co. · Woodland, CA · 1.1%
$100,000
Luke WilliamsPerson · Managing Director, OAK Tree Development · East Haven, CT · 1.1%
$99,652
11 smaller sources, $22K in all (0.3%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
District of Columbia2 contributions · <0.1%
$500
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
The Cigna Group2 contributions · 46% of ranked
$3,000,000
Teton Capital LLC1 contribution · 15% of ranked
$1,000,000
The Yucaipa Companies1 contribution · 15% of ranked
$1,000,000
Educational First Steps1 contribution · 7.7% of ranked
$500,000
ISN Software1 contribution · 7.7% of ranked
$500,000
National Amusements1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked
$250,000
The Morning Star Company1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked
$100,000
OAK Tree Development1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked
$99,652
A further $2,290,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Network Operations Director2 contributions · 46% of ranked
$3,000,000
Chairman2 contributions · 23% of ranked
$1,500,000
Managing Partner1 contribution · 15% of ranked
$1,000,000
Director1 contribution · 7.7% of ranked
$500,000
Executive1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked
$250,000
Agriculturalist1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked
$100,000
Managing Director1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked
$99,652
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$17,180
A further $2,290,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$540,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: DOOR-TO-DOOR GOTV / PRINTING / MEDIA PLACEMENT / MEDIA PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Seth Bodnar$466,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: PRINTING/POSTAGEIndependent spending in opposition to Richard Pan$150,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCT: GOTV PHONE CALLSIndependent spending: $55.5K in support of Seth Bodnar · $27.5K in support of James Etzkorn and 2 more$121,020
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$14<0.1%
Filed as
BANK FEES$14
Paid to
Chain Bridge Bank$14
Total itemized disbursements $8,349,111
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 66 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Independent Voter Project LLC.12 payments · 87% of all spending
$7,291,000
Actum II, LLC3 payments · 8.4% of all spending
$702,000
One Voice Solutions Inc.7 payments · 1.4% of all spending
$121,020
Iheartmedia Entertainment Inc5 payments · 1.3% of all spending
$106,000
Mainframe, LLC3 payments · 0.4% of all spending
$30,281
Junction AI3 payments · 0.4% of all spending
$29,990
Continental Strategic Advisors2 payments · 0.2% of all spending
$20,000
Lipscomb, Holden2 payments · 0.2% of all spending
$20,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Actum II, LLC3 payments, latest Oct 8, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS / MEDIA CONSULTING$702K
Mainframe, LLC3 payments, latest Sep 14, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCT: LIST RENTAL$30.3K