This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$5,000 in 2 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
2
$5K · 100%
All recipients
2
$5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
2
$5K
Recipients 2
RVRandy VillegasDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-22 · via Villegas for Congress1 payment, latest Oct 7, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$3K
AGAdam GrayDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-13 · via Adam Gray for Congress1 payment, latest Oct 7, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$2K
Bars drawn to $3K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$5K across 2 recipient committees, or 4.3% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $185,605 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$178,00096%
Where it came from
Golden State Leadership Fund PAC1 receipt, latest Sep 3, 2026 · Los Angeles, California$50,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $153K from 4 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$6,8503.7%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$7550.4%
Total reported receipts $185,605
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $185.6K followed back through up to 3 committees
20% to named individuals, 74% to organizations, 5.7% not itemized.
Gave directly$130K 70%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Golden State Leadership Fund PACOrganization · 27%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $31,850 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.3K
$1.3K+
$5K+
$11.3K+
$20.1K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California16 contributions · 98%
$31,350
Florida1 contribution · 1.6%
$500
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Erin Niemela1 contribution · 34% of ranked
$1,000
Bryant Whitten LLP1 contribution · 17% of ranked
$500
Eckerd College1 contribution · 17% of ranked
$500
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $115,612 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$82,19171%
Paid to
Valley Impact Strategies Inc2 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$78,107
Trusted Messenger Marketing1 payment · latest Dec 16, 2025 · ONLINE ADS AND CONSULTING FOR CA STATE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$1,191
Second Growth Brewing3 payments · latest Jan 29, 2026 · REISSUE OF VOIDED CHECK$1,000
Meta Platforms1 payment · latest Oct 31, 2025 · ONLINE ADS AND CONSULTING FOR CA STATE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$893
Madera County Democratic Central Committee1 payment · latest Nov 5, 2025 · LOCAL CONTRIBUTION$500
Latinas Lead California1 payment · latest Dec 2, 2025 · LOCAL CONTRIBUTION$500
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$27,42124%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$1,0000.9%
Total reported disbursements $115,612
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $114,557 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$78,10768%
Filed as
NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$78,107
REISSUE OF VOIDED CHECK$1,000
VOIDED CHECK-$1,000
Paid to
Valley Impact Strategies Inc$78,107
Second Growth Brewing$0
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$21,14018%
Filed as
ACCOUNTING & COMPLIANCE SERVICES$13,640
CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$4,000
CAMPAIGN CONSULTANT$3,500
Paid to
Spending over time
$115.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $84.1K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
$115.6K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$84,107
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$3,880
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$4,380
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$3,837
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$17,555
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$1,853
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Other disbursements $82,191
Valley Impact Strategies Inc2 payments, latest Oct 1, 2026NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$78.1K
Trusted Messenger Marketing1 payment, latest Dec 16, 2025ONLINE ADS AND CONSULTING FOR CA STATE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$1.2K
Second Growth Brewing3 payments, latest Jan 29, 2026REISSUE OF VOIDED CHECK$1K
Meta Platforms1 payment, latest Oct 31, 2025ONLINE ADS AND CONSULTING FOR CA STATE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$893
Madera County Democratic Central Committee1 payment, latest Nov 5, 2025LOCAL CONTRIBUTION$500
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 9 payments totaling $82.2K.
A name search for “VALLEY WORKS ACTION FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Marc TurtletaubPerson · Film Producer, Big Beach LLC · San Francisco, CA · 1.1%
$2,066
Stephanie Nguyen for Assembly 2026Organization · 0.9%
$1,653
American Furniture Gallery Inc.Organization · 0.9%
$1,653
Molina Healthcare, IncOrganization · 0.9%
$1,653
Then United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices Local 447 Federal PACBuilding trades (proposed)$9.8K 5.3%
Then United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices Local 447 Federal PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices Local 447 Federal PAC5.3%
$9,804
67 smaller sources, $7.8K in all (4.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Fennemore LLP
1 contribution · 17% of ranked
$500
Miles Sears & Eanni1 contribution · 8.5% of ranked
$250
Fresno Unified School District1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked
$200
A further $28,900 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($755) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 80% of ranked
$25,500
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 11% of ranked
$3,400
Consultant1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$1,000
Lawyer2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$750
Teacher2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$700
Attorney1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked
$500
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($755) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
S.E. Owens & Co.$13,640
By BRI LLC$4,000
Trusted Messenger Marketing$2,000
Valley Impact Strategies, Inc.$1,500
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$7,0006.1%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$5,000
LOCAL CONTRIBUTION$2,000
Paid to
Villegas for Congress$3,000
Adam Gray for Congress$2,000
Second Growth Brewing$1,000
Madera County Democratic Central Committee$500
Latinas Lead California$500
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$4,6694.1%
Filed as
ONLINE ADS$2,585
ONLINE ADS AND CONSULTING FOR CA STATE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE$2,084
Paid to
Meta Platforms$3,478
Trusted Messenger Marketing$1,191
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$2,8002.4%
Filed as
GRAPHIC AND WEB DESIGN SERVICES$2,800
Paid to
Valley Impact Strategies, Inc.$2,800
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$6050.5%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$605
Paid to
Donor Stack, LLC$605
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$2350.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD FEES$235
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$235
Total itemized disbursements $114,557
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 52 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $4,083 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Valley Impact Strategies Inc2 payments · 68% of all spending
$78,107
S.E. Owens & Co.26 payments · 12% of all spending
$14,245
Trusted Messenger Marketing5 payments · 5.8% of all spending
$6,669
Valley Impact Strategies, Inc.2 payments · 3.7% of all spending
Second Growth Brewing3 payments · 0.9% of all spending
$1,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
