Government reformGroups that state a purpose of changing how government works: ethics, campaign finance, elections and reducing partisanship.CausesPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$30.1K to 3 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $30,122
Democratic 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,213,127 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,164,46596%
Where it came from
Sarita RoyOne contribution on Mar 1, 2026 · RETIRED · PLEASANTVILLE, NY$7,000
Loren Skeist19 contributions, latest Oct 2, 2025 · EXECUTIVE · SPELLMAN HIGH VOLTAGE ELECT · BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY$4,750
Henry Smythe10 contributions, latest Sep 20, 2026 · LAWYER · WOMBLE LAW FIRM · CHARLESTON,, SC$4,168
Donald Henley10 contributions, latest May 20, 2026 · PROFESSIONAL MUSICIAN, WRITER, PRODUCE · DONALD HENLEY · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA$4,075
Dylan McClintock5 contributions, latest Apr 1, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · WINTER PARK, FL$3,000
Maribel Tossman196 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · RETIRED · CATHEDRAL CITY, CA$2,931
Joyce L. Biby94 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · RETIRED · SEAL BEACH, CA$2,321
David F. Larson4 contributions, latest Sep 13, 2026 · TAX PREPARATION · SELF · BRISBANE, CA$2,250
Franz GerschwilerOne contribution on Jan 12, 2026 · CEO · BURBLE SOFTWARE COMPANY · ONSTED, MI$2,083
Eugene Stoltzfus2 contributions, latest Jun 23, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · KEEZLETOWN, VA$2,041
Theresa Blumfelder27 contributions, latest Oct 3, 2026 · RETIRED · LAS VEGAS, NV$2,000
Mike Stoller7 contributions, latest Jun 19, 2026 · SONGWRITER · MIKE STOLLER · LOS ANGELES, CA$1,918
The 12 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$37,3693.1%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$11,2930.9%
Total reported receipts $1,213,127
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $274,055 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $2.5K
$2.5K+
$10.2K+
$22.9K+
$40.6K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California1,150 contributions · 23%
$63,474
New York191 contributions · 10%
$27,388
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,255,765 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,234,29698%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$1,5200.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,255,765
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,245,154 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$207,04217%
Filed as
NCA; SMS CARRIER FEES$139,305
NCA; SERVICE FEE$18,949
Spending over time
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $400K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
$1.3M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$4,822
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$157,425
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$195,289
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$211,657
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$399,982
Apr 22 – Jun 30, 2025$80,761
Apr 1 – Apr 21, 2025$64,294
Mar 13 – Mar 31, 2025$24,186
Jan 1 – Mar 12, 2025$117,350
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “EVERY STATE” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Every State is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Editorially reviewed organization match
Match confidence
low
Source coverage
Official pages captured
20
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Massachusetts
435 contributions · 7%
$19,076
Florida121 contributions · 5.6%
$15,262
Virginia143 contributions · 4.4%
$12,003
Texas246 contributions · 4.3%
$11,762
Washington254 contributions · 3.8%
$10,333
Pennsylvania174 contributions · 3.5%
$9,559
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 2,895 contributions · 45% of ranked
$121,818
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 786 contributions · 24% of ranked
$63,830
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 168 contributions · 8.5% of ranked
$22,853
Spellman High Voltage Elect19 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$4,750
Womble LAW Firm10 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$4,168
Burble Software Company1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked
$2,083
Donald Henley4 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$1,667
Millstone Evans Group45 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$1,398
A further $3,773 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,369) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 3,018 contributions · 46% of ranked
$125,894
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 639 contributions · 23% of ranked
$61,415
Lawyer20 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$7,275
Executive23 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$6,521
CEO7 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$4,853
Professional Musician8 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$3,450
Physician19 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$3,434
Songwriter8 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$2,960
A further $1,888 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,369) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
EMPLOYEE WITHHOLDING & PAYROLL TAXES$17,887
NCA; PAYROLL TAXES$14,292
NCA; PROFESSIONAL FEES$10,000
PAYROLL TAXES & WITHHOLDINGS$4,676
NCA; COMMUNICATIONS FEE$839
NCA; PAYROLL PROCESSING FEE$558
PAYROLL TAXES$520
NCA; STORAGE FEES$14
Paid to
Bird$139,305
United States Treasury$37,376
ActBlue Technical Services$18,949
Cove PLLC$10,000
Switchboard$839
Surepayroll$558
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$2.8K of it was independent spending for James Talarico$202,32316%
Filed as
NCA; FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$113,273
NCA; FUNDRAISING TEXT MESSAGING$35,127
NCA; FUNDRAISING TEXT SERVICE$9,504
NCA; DONOR DATABASE$9,500
NCA; FUNDRAISING TEXT LIST RENTAL$9,457
NCA; TEXT MESSAGE LIST RENTAL$8,779
NCA; DATA ACQUISITION$5,833
NCA; TEXT LIST RENTAL$5,054
DATA & LIST RENTAL (CELLS & EMAILS)Independent spending in support of James Talarico$2,750
NCA; DONOR CONTACT SERVICE$2,045
NCA; SURVEY DATA ACQUISITION$1,000
Paid to
Impaction$108,417
Empact StrategiesIndependent spending: $2.8K in support of James Talarico$43,898
Momentum Campaigns$15,000
Empact Strategy$12,959
Grassroots Analytics$10,500
Hockeystick LLC$5,000
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$8.6K of it was independent spending for James Talarico and for Jennifer Gay Valimont and 1 more$180,00514%
Empact StrategiesIndependent spending in support of James Talarico$3,500
Intuit$2,693
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$163,99313%
Filed as
NCA; POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING$80,250
NCA; DIGITAL STRATEGY CONSULTING$21,517
NCA; POLITICAL STRATEGY ADVISORY$18,750
NCA; POLITICAL MESSAGING CONSULTING$14,063
NCA; LEGAL EXPENSE$7,500
NCA; GOVERNMENT COMPLIANCE$5,250
NCA; COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$5,250
NCA; LEGAL EXPENSES$3,802
NCA; COMPLIANCE$3,500
NCA; COMPLIANCE & FEC REPORTING SERVICES$2,520
NCA; COMPLIANCE SERVICES$1,250
NCA; EMAIL COMPLIANCE$341
Paid to
Empact Strategies$63,313
Impaction$36,250
Empact Strategy$28,750
Empact LLC$18,017
The Cobos Law Firm$7,500
Azure Management Co.$3,500
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$124,81610%
Filed as
STAFF SALARY$61,069
NCA; STAFF SALARY$45,633
NCA; PAYROLL$18,114
Paid to
Black, Brian$105,661
Surepayroll$18,114
United States Treasury$1,041
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$114,4439.2%
Filed as
NCA; COMMUNICATIONS & DATA$75,000
NCA; DATA SERVICES$15,772
NCA; GRASSROOTS DATA ACQUIRED$5,500
NCA; VOTER DATA CONSULTING$4,688
NCA; DATA HYGIENE$3,719
NCA; DATA MANAGEMENT$2,625
NCA; VOTER DATA SERVICES$2,000
NCA; WEBSITE & DATA MAINTENANCE$1,750
NCA; SURVEY DATA SOFTWARE$1,197
NCA; SURVEY DATA SERVICES$1,197
NCA; DATA HOSTING$996
Paid to
Bird$75,000
Grassroots Analytics$12,000
Empact Strategies$7,313
L2 Inc.$5,950
Empact Strategy$3,719
Impaction$3,425
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$84,5036.8%
Filed as
NCA; COMMUNICATIONS EXPENSE$45,150
NCA; ADMINISTRATION$12,750
NCA; MERCHANDISE PRODUCTION$9,809
NCA; RALLY MERCH PRODUCTION$7,630
NCA; ADMINISTRATION (DEC 2025)$4,250
NCA; TREASURY SERVICES$1,750
NCA; POLITICAL ORGANIZING$1,197
NCA; AI TOOLS$747
NCA; COMMUNICATIONS EXPENSES$604
NCA; COMMUNICATIONS$409
NCA; REIMBURSEMENT$100
NCA; MERCHANDISE EXPENSE$76
Paid to
Bird$45,150
Empact Strategies$26,480
Empact Strategy$8,745
INVOLVE.ME$1,197
Printful$1,140
Google$1,013
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$65,6445.3%
Filed as
NCA; ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES$46,750
NCA; OFFICE RENT$17,261
NCA; OFFICE EQUIPMENT$1,632
Paid to
Empact Strategies$25,500
Empact Strategy$21,250
Regus Management$17,261
Apple$1,632
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$4.9K of it was independent spending for Jennifer Gay Valimont and for Joshua Joseph Weil$57,1424.6%
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$36,4292.9%
Filed as
NCA; DONATION PROCESSING FEES$36,429
Paid to
Anedot, Inc.$33,654
Numero$2,658
Stripe$117
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$3.5K of it was independent spending for James Talarico$5,8030.5%
Filed as
DIRECT MAILIndependent spending in support of James Talarico$3,500
NCA; POSTAGE$2,101
NCA; SHIPPING & POSTAL$201
Paid to
Empact StrategiesIndependent spending in support of James Talarico$3,500
United States Postal Service$1,337
Mailreach$858
IPOSTAL1$108
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$2,7620.2%
Filed as
NCA; CONTRIBUTION REFUND$2,762
Paid to
Michel, Beno$1,042
Wilson, Mary Louise$720
Harrington, Robert$500
Lewis, Diana RAE$250
Forster, Barbara$250
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$250 of it was independent spending for James Talarico$250<0.1%
Filed as
GOTV EMAILSIndependent spending in support of James Talarico$250
Paid to
Empact StrategiesIndependent spending in support of James Talarico$250
Total itemized disbursements $1,245,154
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,104 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
70 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $144,077 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Bird105 payments · 29% of all spending
$361,095
Impaction40 payments · 14% of all spending
$181,980
Empact Strategies50 payments · 14% of all spending
$178,503
Surepayroll97 payments · 13% of all spending
$161,843
Empact Strategy24 payments · 6.6% of all spending
$82,423
Mailchimp29 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$38,330
Anedot, Inc.207 payments · 2.7% of all spending
$33,654
Switchboard6 payments · 2.1% of all spending
$25,784
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.