Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Other political groupsClearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Forward Party - Restricted
The Forward Party (shortened Forward or FWD) is a centrist political party in the United States. The party was founded by former Democratic 2020 presidential and 2021 New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang and former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. It describes its goals as the reduction of partisan polarization and the implementing of electoral reforms. The party looked to achieve ballot access in all 50 states by 2025 and looks to achieve federal recognition by 2028. Forward was officially formed as a political action committee (PAC) on October 5, 2021. The PAC intended to seek recognition from the Federal Election Commission as a political party to achieve its stated goal of providing an alternative to the two major U.S. political parties. It also stated that, for the time being, candidates affiliated with the organization will remain members of the two major American political parties and third parties, as well as independent candidates. On July 27, 2022, the Forward Party announced that it had merged with the Serve America Movement and the Renew America Movement to further its effort to form a new third party named Forward. Ideologically, Forward is populist and reformist, and a representative of centrism in the United States. It considers itself to be the center within the American political spectrum, although the party has also been described as big tent or syncretic due to its unwillingness on holding any firm stances or positions, and its rejection of the left–right political spectrum. The party's American-style populism, particularly in its early platform, focused toward independent voters and those dissatisfied with the American two-party system, and advocated a universal basic income within humanistic capitalism. It continues to support electoral and democratic reform, including nonpartisan primaries, independent redistricting commissions, and ranked-choice voting. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00789966 · files quarterly
“We believe everyday Americans should be able to decide what’s best for them and their communities.
That’s why we’re building a party that puts the power back in the hands of the American voter by:”
Forward Party, on its own site, forwardparty.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent | 7 | $27,500 | $0 | $27,500 | 73% |
| Other or unresolved | 2 | $7,500 | $0 | $7,500 | 20% |
| Democratic | 1 | $2,500 | $0 | $2,500 | 6.7% |
| Shown support | 10 | $37,500 | $0 | $37,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $2.5K · 6.7% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 9 | $35K · 93% |
| All recipients | 10 | $37.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 3 | $12.5K |
| Iowa | 2 | $10K |
| Montana | 1 | $5K |
| Arizona | 1 | $2.5K |
| Colorado | 1 | $2.5K |
| Washington | 1 | $2.5K |
| Idaho | 1 | $2.5K |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 17 payments | $137.4K |
$137.4K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $21.6K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to AMERICAN BATTLEGROUND FUND · 1 payment |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $64.6K from 10 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $3,246,933
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
84% to named individuals, 2% to organizations, 13% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13% | $432,759 |
| Person · Glenbrook, NV · 6.9% | $224,999 |
| Person · Attorney, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 6.2% | $200,000 |
| Person · Executive Chairman, Kind LLC · New York, NY · 6.2% | $200,000 |
| Person · Finance, IVY Hill Irbd · Ridgefield, CT · 5.5% | $180,000 |
| Person · Board Member, Forward Party · Oldwick, NJ · 5.4% | $175,000 |
| Person · President Emerita, Babson College · Beverly, MA · 4.4% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 161 contributions · 26% | $746,312 |
| 298 contributions · 15% | $429,971 |
| 43 contributions · 14% | $389,545 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $3,209,275
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$3.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Forward Party (shortened Forward or FWD) is a centrist political party in the United States. The party was founded by former Democratic 2020 presidential and 2021 New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang and former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. It describes its goals as the reduction of partisan polarization and the implementing of electoral reforms. The party looked to achieve ballot access in all 50 states by 2025 and looks to achieve federal recognition by 2028. Forward was officially formed as a political action committee (PAC) on October 5, 2021. The PAC intended to seek recognition from the Federal Election Commission as a political party to achieve its stated goal of providing an alternative to the two major U.S. political parties. It also stated that, for the time being, candidates affiliated with the organization will remain members of the two major American political parties and third parties, as well as independent candidates. On July 27, 2022, the Forward Party announced that it had merged with the Serve America Movement and the Renew America Movement to further its effort to form a new third party named Forward. Ideologically, Forward is populist and reformist, and a representative of centrism in the United States. It considers itself to be the center within the American political spectrum, although the party has also been described as big tent or syncretic due to its unwillingness on holding any firm stances or positions, and its rejection of the left–right political spectrum. The party's American-style populism, particularly in its early platform, focused toward independent voters and those dissatisfied with the American two-party system, and advocated a universal basic income within humanistic capitalism. It continues to support electoral and democratic reform, including nonpartisan primaries, independent redistricting commissions, and ranked-choice voting. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Forward Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$59.1K across 14 recipient committees, or 1.8% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $2.6K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $143,000 |
| Person · CEO, Noble Mobile · New York, NY · 4.2% | $134,986 |
| Person · Investor, Bridgewater Associates · Ridgefield, CT · 4.1% | $132,500 |
| Person · Chairman, Star Tribune · West Lake Hills, TX · 3.2% | $105,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · President, Wanxiang America Corp. · South Barrington, IL · 3.1% | $100,000 |
| Person · Investor, RRE Ventures · Lantana, FL · 3.1% | $100,000 |
| Person · Entrepreneur, Self-Employed · Walnut Creek, CA · 3.1% | $100,000 |
| Person · Founder, Million Dollar Baby Co. · San Marino, CA · 2.5% | $80,000 |
| Person · Owner, Drink King Distributing, Co. Inc. · Staten Island, NY · 2.2% | $70,000 |
| Person · Manager, Million Dollar Baby · Pico Rivera, CA · 2% | $65,000 |
| Person · Political Consultant & Commentator, Self-Employed · Bethesda, MD · 1.5% | $50,000 |
| Person · President, Reliant Group · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $50,000 |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 1.5% | $50,000 |
| Person · Retired · Boston, MA · also behind 1 other group · 1.4% | $45,000 |
| Person · Real Estate, OTD · Guilford, CT · 1.1% | $36,125 |
| Person · Consultant, Hollway Advisory Services · Newtown Square, PA · 0.9% | $30,000 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Thredup Inc. · Oakland, CA · 0.9% | $30,000 |
| Person · Senior Operations Manager, The Giving Block · Center Valley, PA · 0.8% | $26,245 |
| Person · Software Consultant, Self-Employed · Covina, CA · 0.8% | $25,030 |
| Person · Small Business Owner, Self-Employed · Leawood, KS · 0.8% | $25,000 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $22,291 |
| Person · President, 76ERS · Camden, NJ · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Investments, Muus & Co. · New York, NY · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Chairman & CEO, Penthera Partners · Roxbury, CT · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Co-Chairman, Guggenheim Securities, LLC · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 1.1% | $34,895 |
| Person · CEO, Citadel · Chicago, IL · 1.1% | $34,895 |
| Person · Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Eminence Capital · New York, NY · 0.7% | $21,286 |
47 smaller sources, $262.9K in all (8.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $228,739 |
| 63 contributions · 7.7% | $218,191 |
| 52 contributions · 7.4% | $208,333 |
| 97 contributions · 4.8% | $135,448 |
| 63 contributions · 4% | $113,234 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 222 contributions · 19% of ranked | $525,525 |
| Written instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $228,230 |
| 2 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $200,000 |
| 10 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $180,000 |
| 21 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $176,660 |
| 4 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $145,000 |
| 12 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $143,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $132,500 |
A further $74,619 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 contributions · 11% of ranked | $295,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 40 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $227,830 |
| 18 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $202,309 |
| 3 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $202,000 |
| 15 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $186,086 |
| 6 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $182,750 |
| 10 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $180,000 |
| 18 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $177,050 |
A further $73,722 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,195,362
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 3,089 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
49 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $325,022 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 48 payments · 51% of all spending | $1,636,699 |
| 44 payments · 10% of all spending | $336,356 |
| 21 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $155,000 |
| 25 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $117,358 |
| 20 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $82,000 |
| 40 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $73,560 |
| 21 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $68,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $54,192 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 1,723 payments totaling $2.9M.