Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
"Progress Action Fund runs hard-hitting ads to defeat Republicans in swing districts, including the viral and critically acclaimed ad “Keep Republicans Out Of Your Bedroom.” When Republicans go low, we go lower, because in politics you have to put your opponent on defense & shape the narrative."
founder and executive director Joe Jacobson (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00754069 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$4.7M raised, $3.8M spent, $1.2M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
60% filed as other receipts · 27% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Scott Wallace, $151K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$200.5K spent for candidates and $474.5K against them, most on MI-SEN ($453K) · $5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Jake Levine ($5K) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$205.5K to 4 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $205,451
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $474,542
Republican 91%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$5,000 in 3 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
1
$5K · 100%
All recipients
1
$5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
1
$5K
Recipients 1
JLJake LevineDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-32 · via Jake Levine For Congress3 payments, latest Sep 21, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 21, 2026$5K
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Jake Levine3 receipts, latest Sep 21, 2026Jake Levine for Congress · H6CA32207$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
$5K across 1 recipient committee, or 0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $4,692,001 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$2,819,53960%
Where it came from
Scott Wallace3 contributions, latest Feb 27, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · DOYLESTOWN, PA$151,000
Joseph W. Kaempfer Jr.7 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · BUILDER · MCARTHURGLEN · MC LEAN, VA$135,000
William Donnelly5 contributions, latest Aug 19, 2026 · RETIRED · MERRILL LYNCH · SEATTLE, WA$115,000
Gregory SerrurierOne contribution on Sep 2, 2026 · INVESTOR · RED WOOD GROVE CAPITAL · WOODSIDE, CA$40,000
Fidelity21 receipts, latest Sep 30, 2026 · Santa Monica, California$35,199
Make Polluters Pay, Inc.1 receipt, latest Mar 3, 2026 · Dover, Delaware$35,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $182.1K from 5 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,272,21527%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$559,16512%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$39,0830.8%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$2,000<0.1%
Total reported receipts $4,692,001
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $4.7M followed back through up to 3 committees
34% to named individuals, 2.1% to organizations, 63% not itemized.
Gave directly$4.3M 91%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee62%
$2,909,015
Scott WallacePerson · Doylestown, PA · 3.2%
$151,000
Joseph W. Kaempfer Jr.Person · Builder, Mcarthurglen · Mc Lean, VA · also behind 1 other group · 2.9%
$135,000
William DonnellyPerson · Retired, Merrill Lynch · Seattle, WA · 2.5%
$115,000
Maryanne TagneyPerson · Seattle, WA · 2.5%
$115,000
Steve CharlesPerson · Unemployed · Bethesda, MD · 2%
$95,000
Miriam SimmonsPerson · Stillwater, MN · 1.6%
$77,000
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $2,567,207 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $23.4K
$23.4K+
$93.4K+
$210.2K+
$373.6K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California4,167 contributions · 23%
$583,803
Washington1,105 contributions · 11%
$288,371
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $3,790,688 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$3,075,02981%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $3,716,527 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$575K of it was independent spending against Michael J. Rogers and for Abdul El-Sayed and 5 more$1,265,94734%
Spending over time
$3.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
$3.8M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$159,598
Jul 16 – Sep 30, 2026$766,538
Jul 1 – Jul 15, 2026$54,738
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$422,404
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$443,098
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$1,124,712
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$819,600
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
This committee’s name carries no organization we could search for in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
"Progress Action Fund runs hard-hitting ads to defeat Republicans in swing districts, including the viral and critically acclaimed ad “Keep Republicans Out Of Your Bedroom.” When Republicans go low, we go lower, because in politics you have to put your opponent on defense & shape the narrative."
founder and executive director Joe Jacobson Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Marjorie RoswellPerson · CEO, Tech for Good Academy · Baltimore, MD · 0.5%
$25,000
Through Ground Game PAC$70K 1.5%
Through Ground Game PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Ground Game PAC1.5%
$70,000
27 smaller sources, $356.5K in all (7.6%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Pennsylvania845 contributions · 9.3%
$238,735
Virginia440 contributions · 7.3%
$187,168
Maryland367 contributions · 6.2%
$159,685
Texas892 contributions · 5.9%
$152,159
Minnesota398 contributions · 4.3%
$110,512
Florida1,062 contributions · 3.7%
$94,560
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 834 contributions · 25% of ranked
$264,459
Merrill Lynch5 contributions · 11% of ranked
$115,000
Mcarthurglen Group4 contributions · 8% of ranked
$85,000
MAF LLC9 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$65,000
Mcarthurglen3 contributions · 4.7% of ranked
$50,000
Alliance Cancer Specialists5 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$45,000
RED Wood Grove Capital1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked
$40,000
Prophet7 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$37,500
A further $1,493,873 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,272,215) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 15,592 contributions · 51% of ranked
$1,236,871
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 741 contributions · 11% of ranked
$266,965
Retail/construction4 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$85,000
Physician177 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$80,490
Marketing16 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$66,550
Consultant91 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$61,778
Builder5 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$50,200
CEO5 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$45,750
A further $141,513 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,272,215) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Filed as
Digital and Streaming Advertising Services (Estimate)Independent spending in opposition to Michael J. Rogers$312,500
AD PRODUCTION$242,098
SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING$180,000
SOCIAL MEDIA ENGAGEMENT$150,000
Digital Advertising - EstimateIndependent spending: $40K in opposition to Michael J. Rogers · $40K in support of Abdul El-Sayed$80,000
MEDIA SPECIALIST$75,000
Digital and Streaming Advertising Services (Estimate) - Partial Payment for Org Est of $312,500.00Independent spending in support of Abdul El-Sayed$58,409
Media Production Services (Actual)Independent spending: $26K in opposition to Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. · $26K in support of James Talarico and 2 more$54,083
Digital Advertising Services - EstimateIndependent spending: $25K in support of Angela Gonzales-Torres · $25K in opposition to Jimmy Gomez$50,000
DIGITAL ADVERTISING OPPOSING GENERIC REPUBLICANS$43,857
Television Advertising - EstimateIndependent spending in opposition to Shri Thanedar$20,000
Paid to
StackadaptIndependent spending: $352.5K in opposition to Michael J. Rogers · $98.4K in support of Abdul El-Sayed and 3 more$520,909
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$857,98923%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$236,362
CONTRIBUTION TO NON-FEDERAL COMMITTEE$108,050
AD PRODUCTION - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$101,169
TEXTING SERVICES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$64,607
STRATEGY CONSULTING SERVICES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$64,400
STRATEGY CONSULTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$50,500
POLLING AND DATA - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$49,500
SALARY - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$39,307
TEXTIMG SERVICES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$28,059
SOFTWARE - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$18,707
PAYROLL TAXES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$16,168
COMPLIANCE SERVICES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$16,120
Paid to
Sapphire Strategies$236,362
American Communications Strategies$124,900
YES on Prop 50, Sponsored by PAF$108,050
Rule of 3$105,991
Switchboard$64,607
Grow Progress$54,780
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$711,87319%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING TEXT MESSAGES$337,714
FUNDRAISING SERVICES$197,099
CONSULTANT - FUNDRAISING$129,380
DONOR ENGAGEMENT$25,000
FUNDRAISING CONSULTANT$16,694
DONOR GIFTS$3,940
EVENT SUPPLIES$1,076
EVENT TICKETS$572
EVENT SPACE RENTAL AND CATERING$397
Paid to
Sapphire Strategies$664,194
Place Public Affairs LLC$25,000
Blue Wave Political Partners$16,694
Crown Awards$2,359
Honolulu Cookie Co.$1,375
Society Awards$1,076
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$249,7996.7%
Filed as
PAYROLL$246,204
PAYROLL - INVOICE$3,595
Paid to
Jacobson, Joe$122,369
Richards, Kyle$100,063
Raynor, Juliana$23,773
Paychex$3,595
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$245,3816.6%
Filed as
TEXTING$206,023
SOFTWARE$35,498
WEBSITE SERVICES$1,571
SUBSCRIPTION$949
DOMAIN NAME HOSTING$591
SUBSCRIPTIONS$432
SOFTWARE - NON - CONTRIBTUION ACCOUNT$317
Paid to
Switchboard$206,023
NGP VAN$30,107
Donoratlas$2,800
Google$1,397
Campaigns & Elections Magazine$1,220
Adobe$980
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$154,3484.2%
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$118,4833.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$68,710
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$49,773
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$118,483
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$42,5001.1%
Filed as
ACCOUNTING AND COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$37,500
DIGITAL STRATEGY$5,000
Paid to
Roger That Compliance, LLC$37,500
Demcast USA$5,000
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$30,8240.8%
Filed as
TRAVEL$16,236
LODGING$14,588
Paid to
Airbnb$4,988
Delta Airlines$4,618
Airbnb, Inc.$3,846
Alaska Airlines$3,161
Priceline$2,958
American Airlines$2,939
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$12,8370.3%
Filed as
CONSULTANT - POLLING$10,000
DATA LEADS$2,185
DATA PURCHASE$652
Paid to
Public Policy Polling$10,000
Rocketreach LLC$2,185
Targetsmart$652
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$12,6850.3%
Filed as
INTERN STIPEND$5,120
MARKET TESTING$3,950
PODCAST RECORDING$1,350
REIMBURSEMENT (VENDORS THAT AGGREGATE OVER $200 LISTED BELOW)$1,222
JOB BOARD PLATFORM$837
IN-FLIGHT WIFI$177
DOMAIN NAME PURCHASE$29
Paid to
Swayable$3,950
LI, Kevin$3,120
Hakemy, Salman$1,500
Aura House$1,350
Richards, Kyle$1,222
Rocketreach LLC$547
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$8,6520.2%
Filed as
MEALS$4,852
OFFICE EQUIPMENT$2,522
OFFICE SUPPLIES$993
ONLINE SECURITY$285
Paid to
Apple Store$2,522
Doordash$2,500
Amazon$993
Claudie$434
Shutters$324
Solidarity Resturaunt$322
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$3,7930.1%
Filed as
WEB DESIGN$2,900
E-MAIL SERVICES$588
SHIPPING OF PAC MATERIALS$305
Paid to
Apollo Artistry$2,900
Signal Hire$588
The UPS Store$305
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$1,417<0.1%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT (SEE MEMOED)$1,183
PAYROLL - SEE MEMOS$233
Paid to
Jacobson, Joe$1,183
Paychex$233
Total itemized disbursements $3,716,527
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,097 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
19 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $269,573 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Sapphire Strategies65 payments · 24% of all spending
$900,556
Stackadapt7 payments · 14% of all spending
$520,909
Paychex66 payments · 11% of all spending
$427,728
Switchboard21 payments · 7.1% of all spending
$270,630
Rule of 319 payments · 5.5% of all spending
$209,310
Endeavor Digital, Inc.7 payments · 4.7% of all spending
$180,000
Sweety High Media2 payments · 4% of all spending
$150,000
Rule of 3 LLC4 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$142,862
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.