“Achieve Democratic victories in Texas through personal relationships with low-propensity voters through a community of volunteers who find, engage, and turn out the voters who provide the winning margins in close races across the ballot.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$6,100 in 2 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic party committees
1
$1.1K · 18%
Other PACs and committees
1
$5K · 82%
All recipients
2
$6.1K
By the candidate’s state
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
ActBlueHybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 1 payment
$4.2K
$4.2K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
$106.1K across 3 recipient committees, or 1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $8,020,258 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$4,935,26362%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$2,394,35730%
Largest donors
Jennifer W. Clark4 contributions, latest Feb 10, 2026 · INVESTOR · SELF EMPLOYED · AUSTIN, TX$20,000
Linda Moore7 contributions, latest Sep 28, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · MONTGOMERY, TX$8,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 9 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 31,953 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.7M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$657,8608.2%
Where it came from
Middle Seat18 receipts, latest Oct 2, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$565,167
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $604K from 3 sources in all.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$28,5580.4%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$4,219<0.1%
Committees that gave
ActBlue1 receipt, latest Dec 9, 2025 · Hybrid pac (nonqualified)$4,219
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $8,020,258
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $8M followed back through up to 3 committees
4.1% to named individuals, 7.5% to organizations, 88% not itemized.
Gave directly$7.6M 95%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee88%
$7,083,719
Middle SeatOrganization · 7%
$565,167
105 smaller sources, $371.4K in all (4.6%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $2,790,978 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $59.3K
$59.3K+
$237.1K+
$533.4K+
$948.3K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Texas20,666 contributions · 53%
$1,481,740
District of Columbia86 contributions · 11%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $11,057,039 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$7,370,27367%
Paid to
Middle Seat47 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · DIGITAL ADVERTISING$3,007,342
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $11,018,996 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$3,007,34227%
Filed as
DIGITAL ADVERTISING$3,007,342
Paid to
Middle Seat$3,007,342
Spending over time
$11.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $6.1M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
$11.1M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$313,296
September 2026$623,989
August 2026$433,542
July 2026$333,249
June 2026$436,036
May 2026$375,332
April 2026$284,807
March 2026$436,549
February 2026$373,675
January 2026$510,694
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$6,068,422
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$867,447
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “POWERED BY PEOPLE” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Powered by People is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Exact FEC committee ID in LittleSis
Match confidence
high
Source coverage
Official pages captured
19
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
$315,708
California3,066 contributions · 10%
$282,597
New York671 contributions · 2.9%
$80,494
Virginia282 contributions · 2.5%
$70,685
Washington888 contributions · 2.3%
$63,442
Massachusetts537 contributions · 1.9%
$51,860
Colorado404 contributions · 1.3%
$35,776
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 22,024 contributions · 72% of ranked
$1,548,263
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 2,599 contributions · 14% of ranked
$303,633
Beasley Associates20 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$12,700
TER Services LLC7 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$8,000
Yale University3 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$8,000
PEC5 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$5,765
United Airlines19 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$5,550
Texas A&M University89 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$5,500
A further $362,650 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,935,263) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 20,416 contributions · 60% of ranked
$1,396,707
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1,627 contributions · 6.6% of ranked
$151,948
Attorney793 contributions · 4.4% of ranked
$100,962
Physician370 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$41,499
Professor411 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$31,382
Investor33 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$29,927
Writer132 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$26,809
Marketing94 contributions · 1% of ranked
$23,587
A further $357,187 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,935,263) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
PXP21 payment · latest Sep 5, 2025 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$1,900,000
Texas House Democratic Caucus2 payments · latest Aug 11, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION TO NON-FEDERAL COMMITTEE$1,000,000
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$287,1902.6%
Filed as
DATA CONSULTANT$145,890
DATA CONSULTING$110,600
VOTER FILE ACCESS$22,000
RESEARCH CONSULTING$6,200
DATA AND ORGANIZING CONSULTING SERVICES$2,500
Paid to
Goktas, Pinar$145,890
The Information LAB US, Inc.$110,600
Texas Democratic Party$22,000
Yazman, Joshua$6,200
The Social Practice LLC$2,500
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$195,4401.8%
Filed as
TRAVEL$178,201
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT$17,239
Paid to
Southwest Airlines$36,324
American Airlines$27,624
United Airlines$13,487
Hertz$13,117
Expedia$10,086
Hilton Garden INN SAN Marcos$6,816
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$118,5681.1%
Filed as
EVENT VENUE RENTAL$30,004
VENUE RENTAL$26,739
EVENT ENTERTAINMENT$18,425
EVENT SPACE RENTAL$15,081
CATERING$12,733
EVENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL$6,343
EVENT SECURITY$3,678
EVENT PRODUCTION$2,493
EVENT ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES$1,560
EVENT TICKETS$912
EVENT SPONSORSHIP$600
Paid to
Stable Hall$6,358
The Cultural Arts Center$5,950
Delco Center$5,528
City of Humble$5,089
France-Merrick Performing Arts Center$5,000
Scott Conference Center$4,850
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$107,2371%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL$69,576
PRINTING$30,746
POSTAGE$3,469
SHIPPING$3,446
Paid to
Kinetic Campaigns$69,576
Proper Printshop$21,122
UPS Store$3,426
Bumperactive$2,817
IMPRINT.COM$2,394
Deliver Strategies, LLC$2,029
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$42,2970.4%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$16,907
TRAVEL AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$5,699
PAYROLL - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$3,045
MEALS AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$2,843
OFFICE SUPPLIES, TRAVEL, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,895
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: TRAVEL AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,703
TRAVEL, MEALS, OFFICE SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT RENTAL, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,651
TRAVEL, OFFICE SUPPLIES, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,298
OFFICE SUPPLIES, MEALS, TRAVEL, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,170
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: PAYROLL - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,162
MEALS, TRAVEL, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$820
MEALS, TRAVEL, OFFICE SUPPLIES, SHIPPING, AND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$773
Paid to
American Express$16,907
Goldberg, Grant$6,723
Payroll Data Processing$3,484
Patel, Dharini$2,976
Shelby, Randy$2,840
Evans, Darrel$2,111
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$16,6710.2%
Filed as
BONUS$15,405
WORKERS COMPENSATION$1,004
INTERPRETER SERVICES$620
VOID OF CHECK DATED 9/27/24 ISSUED IN ERROR-$358
Paid to
Mason, Eva$11,046
OST, Lisl$4,359
Amtrust North America$1,004
Hands of Equality LLC$620
Texas Tech Police Department-$358
Total itemized disbursements $11,018,996
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 5,317 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
153 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,542,454 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Middle Seat47 payments · 27% of all spending
$3,007,342
PXP21 payment · 17% of all spending
$1,900,000
Payroll Data Processing138 payments · 14% of all spending
$1,567,067
Texas House Democratic Caucus2 payments · 9% of all spending
$1,000,000
Marziani Stevens & Gonzalez PLLC3 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$504,225
ActBlue Technical Services158 payments · 2.6% of all spending
$284,592
NGP VAN50 payments · 2.3% of all spending
$256,561
American Express9 payments · 2.2% of all spending
$239,373
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
PXP21 payment, latest Sep 5, 2025NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$1.9M
Texas House Democratic Caucus2 payments, latest Aug 11, 2025CONTRIBUTION TO NON-FEDERAL COMMITTEE$1M