FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00636944 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$2.5M raised, $2.3M spent, $1.2M cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
62% filed as other receipts · 24% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Vote Save America, $15K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$15K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,543,319 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,564,95262%
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.6M from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$611,72624%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$334,75913%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$16,8820.7%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$15,0000.6%
Committees that gave
Vote Save America2 receipts, latest May 12, 2026 · Pac (qualified)$15,000
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $2,543,319
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2.5M followed back through up to 3 committees
10% to named individuals, 56% to organizations, 3.6% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 30% not itemized.
Gave directly$2M 80%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
States Win, IncOrganization · 48%
$1,223,718
Not itemized by this committee29%
$742,303
Green Advocacy ProjectOrganization · 2%
$50,000
Merrill LynchOrganization · 1.2%
$30,962
Through Government That Works PACGovernment reform$163.2K 6.4%
Through Government That Works PAC
Name
Amount
Responsive Government ActionOrganization · 2%
$52,041
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $626,656 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $12.5K
$12.5K+
$50K+
$112.6K+
$200.2K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California2,912 contributions · 50%
$312,766
New York347 contributions · 8.4%
$52,518
Massachusetts498 contributions · 7.8%
$48,811
Illinois380 contributions · 5.2%
$32,399
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $2,269,180 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,576,21769%
Paid to
Versus Media Group LLC2 payments · latest Sep 24, 2026 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - NON-FEDERAL MEDIA & PRODUCTION SERVICES$795,116
Sister District Project, Inc6 payments · latest Oct 24, 2025 · NON-FEDERAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS$199,309
Merrill Lynch2 payments · latest May 7, 2026 · BANK FEES$95
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$2,4560.1%
Total reported disbursements $2,269,180
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $2,265,334 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,306,85058%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - NON-FEDERAL MEDIA & PRODUCTION SERVICES$795,116
$2.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $1.3M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$2.3M
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$1,329,198
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$120,939
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$108,223
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$299,267
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$411,552
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “STATES WIN” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
Sixteen Thirty FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.8%
$44,952
Contours, Inc.Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 0.9%
$23,859
Global Impact Social Welfare FundOrganization · 0.9%
$23,341
Reid HoffmanPerson · Partner, Greylock Partners · Anacortes, WA · also behind 21 other groups · 0.7%
$19,018
318 smaller sources, $331.8K in all (13%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
District of Columbia179 contributions · 5%
$31,299
Maryland166 contributions · 3.6%
$22,773
Oregon306 contributions · 3.6%
$22,680
Wisconsin31 contributions · 2%
$12,275
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 572 contributions · 23% of ranked
$53,538
City Of Cambridge8 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$6,711
Apple INC26 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$6,166
Nvidia3 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$5,750
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked
$5,000
Morgan Stanley1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked
$5,000
Stifel Financial Group1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked
$5,000
ST Mary's International School1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked
$5,000
A further $382,054 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($334,759) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 2,426 contributions · 43% of ranked
$260,016
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 642 contributions · 17% of ranked
$105,772
Attorney216 contributions · 4.4% of ranked
$26,521
Physician206 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$10,941
Administrator49 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$10,861
Activist2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$7,500
Consultant49 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$7,495
Financial Advisor3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$6,500
A further $15,871 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($334,759) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$400,10718%
Filed as
OPERATING EXP. INCLUDING STAFF SALARIES & OVERHEAD$400,000
REIMBURSEMENT-STAFF TIME$107
Paid to
Sister District Project, Inc$400,000
Sister District Action Network$107
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$345,39615%
Filed as
DIGITAL CONSULTING SERVICES$236,800
LEGAL SERVICES$65,911
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$42,510
REIMBURSEMENT-LEGAL SERVICES$175
Paid to
Middle Seat Consulting$236,800
Elias Law Group LLP$65,911
Katz Compliance$42,510
Sister District Action Network$175
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$162,2307.2%
Filed as
NON-FEDERAL - DIGITAL ADVERTISING SERVICES$162,230
Paid to
Targetsmart Communications$162,230
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$39,4701.7%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$33,258
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$6,212
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$39,470
TransfersMoney moved to an affiliated or authorised committee.$5,0000.2%
Filed as
TRANSFER TO 527 COMMITTEE ACCOUNT$5,000
Paid to
States Win, Inc$5,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$3,4020.2%
Filed as
BANK FEES$3,402
Paid to
Amalgamated Bank$3,307
Merrill Lynch$95
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$2,000<0.1%
Filed as
OPERATING EXPENDITURES REIMBURSEMENT$2,000
Paid to
States Win, Inc$2,000
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$819<0.1%
Filed as
REIMB: TRAVEL$594
REIMB: TRAVEL & MEALS$225
Paid to
Flom, Lisa$315
Appelbaum, Alec$279
Schaefer, Ellen$225
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$60<0.1%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT-POSTAGE$60
Paid to
Sister District Action Network$60
Total itemized disbursements $2,265,334
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 340 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Versus Media Group LLC2 payments · 35% of all spending
$795,116
Sister District Project, Inc7 payments · 22% of all spending
$499,309
Middle Seat Consulting22 payments · 10% of all spending
$236,800
States Win, Inc13 payments · 8% of all spending
$181,706
Targetsmart Communications2 payments · 7.1% of all spending
$162,230
Moxie Media1 payment · 3.7% of all spending
$84,480
Elias Law Group LLP13 payments · 3.2% of all spending
$73,550
Ohio Progressive Collaborative2 payments · 2.6% of all spending
$60,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Versus Media Group LLC2 payments, latest Sep 24, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - NON-FEDERAL MEDIA & PRODUCTION SERVICES$795.1K
Sister District Project, Inc6 payments, latest Oct 24, 2025NON-FEDERAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS$199.3K
States Win, Inc13 payments, latest Sep 22, 2026NON-FEDERAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS$181.7K