Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00608380 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 3 | $32.6K · 100% |
| All recipients | 3 | $32.6K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $20K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $37.7K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KELLY · 1 payment | $15K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$67.7K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $20K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $10K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC/STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $2.6K |
$32.6K across 3 recipient committees, or 0.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 14 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $71.4K from 2 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $62.7K, more than the $5K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $4,364,411
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
83% to named individuals, 1.4% to organizations, 15% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Founder and Clinical Director, Cooper House Clinic · Seattle, WA · also behind 3 other groups · 29% | $1,250,000 |
| 15% | $647,686 |
| Person · Software Executive, Oracle Corp. · Woodside, CA · 11% | $500,000 |
| Person · Retired · Piedmont, CA · also behind 1 other group · 10% | $450,000 |
| Person · Analyst, Senate · Washington, DC · also behind 7 other groups · 5.7% | $250,000 |
| Person · Mount Vernon, WA · 2.3% | $100,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 155 contributions · 41% | $1,603,870 |
| 488 contributions · 31% | $1,225,865 |
| 26 contributions · 8.6% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $4,032,121
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.4M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2018 cycleReport released Apr 28, 2021
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
DLCC PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $100,000 |
| Person · Director, Ezcater, Inc. · Weston, MA · 1.9% | $85,002 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 1.7% | $75,000 |
| Person · Co-Founder, Raikes Foundation · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $62,500 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Co-Founder, Raikes Foundation · Seattle, WA · 1.4% | $62,500 |
| Organization · 1.4% | $61,389 |
| Person · Attorney, Buchanan Ingersoll and Rooney · Alexandria, VA · also behind 1 other group · 1.1% | $50,000 |
| Person · President & CEO, WA Women's Foundation · Medina, WA · 1.1% | $50,000 |
| Person · Retired · Cupertino, CA · 1.1% | $50,000 |
| Person · Senior Advisor, Berkshire Partners · Cambridge, MA · 1.1% | $50,000 |
| Person · Theatrical Producer, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 1.1% | $50,000 |
| Person · Investment Professional, Hull Street Energy · Baltimore, MD · 1% | $44,300 |
| Person · Retired · Seattle, WA · 0.6% | $27,500 |
| Person · Finance, Eagle Global Asvisors · Houston, TX · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Public Policy, Self-Employed · Brooklyn, NY · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Cooley LLP · La Jolla, CA · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Self-Employed, Attorney · San Francisco, CA · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Washington, DC · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Executive, Nanostring Technologies · Bellevue, WA · 0.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Jose, CA · 0.6% | $25,000 |
74 smaller sources, $223.5K in all (5.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $333,224 |
| 310 contributions · 6.3% | $243,569 |
| 143 contributions · 4.3% | $165,856 |
| 82 contributions · 1.9% | $73,017 |
| 53 contributions · 1.6% | $62,095 |
| 118 contributions · 0.9% | $35,172 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 32% of ranked | $1,250,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,229 contributions · 17% of ranked | $656,548 |
| 5 contributions · 13% of ranked | $500,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 182 contributions · 9.4% of ranked | $363,497 |
| 2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $250,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 216 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $219,970 |
| 8 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $125,000 |
| 5 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $85,002 |
A further $41,870 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($387,180) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 32% of ranked | $1,250,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 188 contributions · 17% of ranked | $650,997 |
| 5 contributions · 13% of ranked | $500,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,225 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $379,048 |
| 2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $250,000 |
| 8 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $125,000 |
| 84 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $108,909 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $100,000 |
A further $31,870 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($387,180) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $4,020,424
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 383 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
11 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $138,291 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 35% of all spending | $1,400,000 |
| 2 payments · 17% of all spending | $700,000 |
| 5 payments · 15% of all spending | $600,000 |
| 4 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.3% of all spending | $175,000 |
| 12 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $138,300 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $100,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 32 payments totaling $3.8M.