Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Electing women's & communities' candidatesGroups whose purpose is electing, or mobilizing voters for, candidates from a shared community: women, or Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander candidates, among others. The community has to be an identity people share, not an age bracket or a political stance.CausesPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (qualified)San Francisco, CaliforniaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00585687 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 10 | $24.5K · 59% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $593 · 1.4% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $3.7K · 8.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 3 | $12.5K · 30% |
| All recipients | 15 | $41.3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 2 | $7.1K |
| Illinois | 2 | $5.7K |
| Maine | 1 | $5K |
| Michigan | 2 | $5K |
| Texas | 1 | $1.1K |
| New York | 1 | $593 |
| Alaska | 1 | $446 |
| California | 1 | $160 |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to UNITEDEMOCRATS PAC · 1 payment | $700 |
$700 from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MAINE SENATE VICTORY 2026 · 4 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 4 payments | $3.7K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 259 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $653.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $687,058
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
74% to named individuals, 26% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26% | $175,665 |
| Person · Woodside, CA · 12% | $80,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 4.4% | $30,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 3.6% | $25,000 |
| Person · Lawyer, Trucker Huss · San Francisco, CA · 2.9% | $20,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 2.1% | $14,105 |
| Person · Founder and Chief Information Officer, NIA Impact Capital · Berkeley, CA · 1.5% | $10,525 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 256 contributions · 99% | $674,035 |
| 3 contributions · 0.4% | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.3% | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $1,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 20 contributions · 20% of ranked | $52,000 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $553,856
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$553.9K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $164.3K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Electing Women BAY Area PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 5 payments | $3.7K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT BACK MIDWEST · 3 payments | $3.4K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to JULIANA VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $3.2K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MCMORROW VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ROBIN KELLY FOR CONGRESS · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $1.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $1.1K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to GILLIBRAND VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $593 |
$35.3K across 15 recipient committees, or 6.4% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $20.5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Person · Retired · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% |
| $10,250 |
| Person · Co-Founder, Linkedin · West Hollywood, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Sidley LLP · Berkeley, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Writer, Self-Employed, Same Name · Los Gatos, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Math Education Consultant, Dibrenzia Consulting · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed, Same Name · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Farmer, Puma Springs Vineyards · Healdsburg, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Physician, Self-Employed, Same Name · Los Altos, CA · also behind 4 other groups · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed, Same Name · Kentfield, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Albany, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer and Founder, Cantellus Group · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Researcher, University of California, SAN Francisc · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · Oakland, CA · also behind 1 other group · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · President, The Scott Foundation · Los Gatos, CA · also behind 3 other groups · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 1.5% | $10,000 |
| Person · Regional Head of Business Development, Wealthspire Advisors · San Francisco, CA · 1.1% | $7,500 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 0.9% | $6,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Law Office of Randy Sue Pollock · Piedmont, CA · 0.9% | $6,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 0.9% | $6,000 |
| Person · Retired · Woodside, CA · 0.9% | $6,000 |
| Person · Director, Packard Foundation · Palo Alto, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired · Berkeley, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Retired · Berkeley, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Designer, Meta · Berkeley, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Strategic Fundraising Advisor, LMF Advisors · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Strategic Fundraising Advisor, LMF Advisors · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Mayer Brown LLP · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Atherton, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Palo Alto, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Lafayette, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Investor, Catamount Ventures · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Menlo Park, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
1 smaller source, $13 in all (<0.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| 4 contributions · 7.7% of ranked |
| $20,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4% of ranked | $10,525 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $418,810 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($370) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 52 contributions · 34% of ranked | $231,090 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 92 contributions · 27% of ranked | $179,470 |
| 19 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $32,840 |
| 5 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 5 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 6 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $13,105 |
| 5 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $13,000 |
A further $6,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($370) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $530,806
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 649 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
56 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $30,804 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 50 payments · 27% of all spending | $151,721 |
| 56 payments · 14% of all spending | $79,421 |
| 45 payments · 7.5% of all spending | $41,576 |
| 5 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $34,376 |
| 65 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $32,637 |
| 23 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $29,392 |
| 19 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $26,786 |
| 54 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $21,717 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 74 payments totaling $92.6K.