Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Senate campaign committee › 2025–2026
Senate campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeeBismarck, North DakotaActive
Connected organization: 2024 Republican Senate Victory
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00504704 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL MARINE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION · 5 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC · 5 payments | $5.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ASSOCIATION OF FUNDRAISING PROFESSIONALS · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to THE CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES, INC. · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TEAM HILL · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ENERGY MARKETERS OF AMERICA SMALL BUSINESS COMMITTEE PAC (EMA SBC PAC) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PAC FOR AMERICA 2 · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$237.8K from 106 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 8,934 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $464.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,331,452
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
24% to named individuals, 0.8% to organizations, 75% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 66% | $883,800 |
| Person · Retired · Saint Paul, MN · 1.1% | $14,000 |
| Person · Retired · Tucson, AZ · 1% | $13,720 |
| Person · Research Scientist, Redwood Research · Berkeley, CA · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, General Atomics ASI · La Jolla, CA · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · Researcher, Openai · San Francisco, CA · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Anthropic · Burlingame, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.5% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,004 contributions · 14% | $64,917 |
| 171 contributions · 11% | $53,599 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,421,206
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $373K, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Cramer for Senate is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Senate campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names 2024 Republican Senate Victory as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
| $7,000 |
| Person · Manager, DMM Proprieta Management · Aspen, CO · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · Managing Partner, Soroban Capital Partners LP · Aspen, CO · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · Consultant, Civic Service Inc. · Saint Louis, MO · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Co-CEO Co-CIO President, Elliott Investment Management · Palm Beach, FL · also behind 23 other groups · 0.5% | $7,000 |
| Person · Member of Technical Staff, Metr · Berkeley, CA · 0.5% | $7,000 |
4637 smaller sources, $343.2K in all (26%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $35,387 |
| 1,180 contributions · 5.7% | $26,834 |
| 156 contributions · 5.5% | $25,568 |
| 98 contributions · 5.5% | $25,547 |
| 22 contributions · 4.6% | $21,664 |
| 91 contributions · 4.3% | $20,269 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 7,627 contributions · 40% of ranked | $181,869 |
| Written instead of an employer · 370 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $23,663 |
| 26 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $21,877 |
| 22 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $17,207 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $16,490 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($544,162) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 7,623 contributions · 40% of ranked | $182,225 |
| 103 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $29,053 |
| 56 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $23,749 |
| 11 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $10,062 |
| 22 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $9,721 |
| 9 contributions · 2% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 37 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $8,629 |
| 43 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $7,085 |
A further $15,031 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($544,162) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,294,087
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 1,065 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
26 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $147,099 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 31 payments · 29% of all spending | $412,569 |
| 42 payments · 22% of all spending | $308,689 |
| 37 payments · 12% of all spending | $176,508 |
| 13 payments · 11% of all spending | $153,837 |
| 21 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $64,879 |
| 44 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $32,791 |
| 32 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $20,249 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $19,051 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.