Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
99% traces to National Association of Realtors, a tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors. See where the money traces to
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Lobbyist/registrant PACChicago, IllinoisActive
Connected organization: National Association of Realtors
Political fund of National Association of Realtors
American real estate agent organization based in Chicago (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00488742 · files monthly
1 priority from the site of National Association of Realtors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Two new studies commissioned by the National Association of REALTORS® reveal that A Capital Gains Tax Cliff Is Coming That Will Hit Middle-Class Homeowners Hard.
The studies uncover the urgent need to modernize the federal capital gains exclusion for the sale of a primary residence—an outdated policy that’s increasingly locking up the housing market and discouraging mobility.
Homeowners are facing a looming tax penalty simply for staying in their homes too long.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy/nar-legislative-priorities
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 7 | $22.1M · 100% |
| All recipients | 7 | $22.1M |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $10.8M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 1 payment | $2M |
$2M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 4 payments | $10.8M |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to MINNESOTA SECOND DISTRICT VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $4.3M |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 2 payments | $3.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to WINSENATE · 3 payments | $2.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $250K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to FRIENDS OF ANDY BARR COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $100K |
$21.4M across 6 recipient committees, or 96% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 4 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 28 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $22.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $22,221,786
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
99% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 99% | $22,100,000 |
5 smaller sources, $121.8K in all (0.5%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 28 contributions · 100% | $22,155,854 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 contributions · 100% of ranked | $55,854 |
A further $22,100,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $22,155,854
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $22,155,854
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$22.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $12M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
American real estate agent organization based in Chicago Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Association of Realtors Congressional Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
All 37 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 49% of all spending | $10,750,000 |
| 3 payments · 19% of all spending | $4,250,000 |
| 2 payments · 16% of all spending | $3,500,000 |
| 3 payments · 11% of all spending | $2,500,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.4% of all spending | $750,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 17 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $44,718 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.