FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00419036 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$70.5K raised, $60K spent, $188.6K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
53% from PACs and other committees · 43% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Corning Inc. Employees PAC, $10K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$58.5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Mark R. Warner ($4K) · 49% of its support to Democrats, 43% to Republicans. See where it goes
Lobbying
Information Technology Industry Council lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$56.5K to 37 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $56,500
Democratic 49%
Republican 43%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
18
$27,500
$0
$27,500
49%
Republican
15
$24,500
$0
$24,500
43%
Other or unresolved
4
$4,500
$0
$4,500
8%
Shown support
37
$56,500
$0
$56,500
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$58,500 in 48 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
18
$27.5K · 47%
Republican candidates
15
$24.5K · 42%
Other or unresolved candidates
4
$4.5K · 7.6%
Other PACs and committees
2
$2.5K · 4.2%
All recipients
39
$59K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
5
$9K
Virginia
2
$5K
New York
2
$5K
Florida
3
$5K
Ohio
3
$4K
Massachusetts
2
$3K
Kentucky
1
$2.5K
Rhode Island
1
$2K
The largest 8 of 23 states.
Recipients 39
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Mark Robert Warner2 receipts, latest Sep 29, 2026Friends of Mark Warner · S6VA00093$4K
Andrew Garbarino1 receipt, latest Sep 30, 2025Garbarino for Congress · H0NY02234$3.5K
Jay Obernolte2 receipts, latest Jun 29, 2026Jay Obernolte for Congress · H0CA08135$3K
Doris Matsui3 receipts, latest Apr 1, 2026Matsui for Congress · H6CA05195$2.5K
S. Brett Brett Guthrie1 receipt, latest Jun 29, 2026Guthrie for Congress · H8KY02031$2.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$30,22343%
Largest donors
Julia Massimino30 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · EVP, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$8,800
Jason Oxman25 contributions, latest Dec 25, 2025 · PRESIDENT/CEO · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · ARLINGTON, VA$4,800
Jason Oxman5 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · PRESIDENT, CEO · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$3,648
Jonathan Pawlow25 contributions, latest Dec 25, 2025 · SENIOR DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · ALEXANDRIA, VA$3,000
Jonathan Pawlow5 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · VP, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$2,280
Lara MuldoonOne contribution on Jul 24, 2026 · SENIOR DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$1,500
Lara MuldoonOne contribution on Sep 24, 2025 · SENIOR DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$1,500
Mike Flynn22 contributions, latest Dec 25, 2025 · SENIOR DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · ARLINGTON, VA$990
Stephanie Patel5 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$900
Mike Flynn5 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · SVP, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$855
Margaret McCarthy21 contributions, latest Dec 25, 2025 · SENIOR DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$840
Margaret McCarthy5 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · VP, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INFO TECH INDUSTRY COUNCIL · WASHINGTON, DC$760
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 157 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $30.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$1,5002.1%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,2671.8%
Total reported receipts $70,490
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $70.5K followed back through up to 3 committees
65% to named individuals, 35% not itemized.
Gave directly$32.6K 46%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Julia MassiminoPerson · EVP, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Washington, DC · 12%
$8,800
Jason OxmanPerson · President/ceo, Info Tech Industry Council · Arlington, VA · 12%
$8,448
Jonathan PawlowPerson · Senior Director, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Alexandria, VA · 7.5%
$5,280
Lara MuldoonPerson · Senior Director, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Washington, DC · 4.3%
$3,000
Not itemized by this committee3.9%
$2,767
Mike FlynnPerson · Senior Director, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Arlington, VA · 2.6%
$1,845
Margaret McCarthyPerson · Senior Director, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Washington, DC · 2.3%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $30,223 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $857
$857+
$3.4K+
$7.7K+
$13.7K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
District of Columbia85 contributions · 71%
$21,433
Virginia72 contributions · 29%
$8,790
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Info Tech Industry Council132 contributions · 83% of ranked
$25,223
Information Technology Industr25 contributions · 17% of ranked
$5,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,267) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $60,042 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$60,00099.9%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$42<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $60,042
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $58,500 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$58,500100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$58,500
Paid to
Friends of Mark Warner$4,000
Garbarino for Congress$3,500
Jay Obernolte for Congress$3,000
Matsui for Congress$2,500
Guthrie for Congress$2,500
Laurel Lee for Congress, Inc.$2,000
Total itemized disbursements $58,500
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 48 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$60K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $19.5K, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
$60K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What Information Technology Industry Council lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Information Technology Industry Council pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$2.2M
Quarterly reports read
12
Bills it named
74
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Budget/Appropriationsin 9 report entries
In its own words
Issues related to Fiscal Year 2027 appropriations; Issues related to government reform and IT modernization.
Issues related to FY'27 appropriations; Issues related to government reform and IT modernization.
Issues related to fiscal year 2027 appropriations.
FY 2027 CJS Appropriations.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Commerce, Dept of (DOC)
Computer Industryin 9 report entries · 22 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to export controls of artificial intelligence, chip security, and remote access security;
Issues related to artificial intelligence policy;
Issues related to cybersecurity policy;
Issues related to right-to-repair;
H.R. 2683/S. 3519 - Remote Access Security Act;
H.R. 6875 - AI OVERWATCH Act;
H.R. 8170 - the MATCH Act;
H.R. 3447 - Chip Security Act;
H.R. 6058 - the STRIDE Act;
H.R. 8283 - the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act;
H.R.7003 - BIS STRENGTH Act;
H.R.6996 - Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act;
H.R. 8284 - Bureau of Industry and Security License Administration Enhancement Act;
Natl Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA)
and 3 more offices
Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
White House Office
Energy/Nuclearin 9 report entries · 10 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to AI energy use;
Issues related to data centers;
Issues related to permitting reform;
Issues related to microgrid policy;
H.R. 5332/S. 3269 - Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 H.R. 6633 - High-Capacity Grid Act S. 3947 - REWIRE Act;
H.R. 9340 - Ratepayer Protection Act;
H.R. 9332 - Load Forecasting Enhancement Act;
H.R. 9339 - Affordable Innovation for the Grid Act;
H.R. 9335 - Advanced Transmission Technology to Reduce Rates Act;
H.R. 4776 - SPEED Act;
S. 5159 - Supporting Transformative Resilience, Operations, and Next-Generation Grid Innovation Deployment Act.
H.R. 5332 - Liquid Cooling for AI Act of 2025 H.R. 6633 - High-Capacity Grid Act S. 3947 - REWIRE Act;
H.R.9332 - Load Forecasting Enhancement Act;
H.R.9339 - Affordable Innovation for the Grid Act;
H.R.9335 - Advanced Transmission Technology to Reduce Rates Act;
H.R.4776 - SPEED Act.
Monitor issues related to permitting reform including H.R.4776 SPEED Act. Monitor H.R. 9340, Ratepayer Protection Act. Issues related to AI energy use; Issues related to data centers; Issues related to permitting reform
Issues related to permitting reform; Issues related to H.R. 4776 - SPEED Act; Issues related to data centers; Issues related to artificial intelligence energy use.
Homeland Securityin 9 report entries · 10 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to cybersecurity, information sharing, operational collaboration, cyber regulatory harmonization, state and local cybersecurity grant program reauthorization;
H.R.1000 - Cyber PIVOTT Act;
H.R.5079 - Widespread Information Management for the Welfare of Infrastructure and Government Act;
S.1875 - Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act;
S.3404 - Satellite Cybersecurity Act;
S.3251 - State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program Reauthorization Act.
Issues related to cybersecurity, information sharing, operational collaboration, cyber regulatory harmonization, and state and local cybersecurity grant program reauthorization;
S.3251 - State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program Reauthorization Act;
H.R.9492 - Cybersecurity Logging Enforcement and Accountability Reporting Act.
Issues related to cyber workforce;
General cyber issues;
Supply chain issues;
Issues related to cyber information sharing;
Issues related to S. 1337 - Cybersecurity Information Sharing Extension Act;
Issues related to S. 2983 - Extending Expired Cybersecurity Authorities Act;
Issues related to H.R. 5079 - Widespread Information Management for the Welfare of Infrastructure and Government Act;
Immigrationin 9 report entries
In its own words
Issues related to high-skilled immigration.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services (BCIS)
Commerce, Dept of (DOC)
Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS)
Labor, Dept of (DOL)
Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)
White House Office
Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplacein 9 report entries · 5 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to workforce development;
Issues related to the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Reauthorization;
H.R. 8345/S. 4046 - Economy of the Future Commission Act;
S.383 - JOBS Act of 2025;
S.3339 - AI Workforce PREPARE Act of 2026;
S. 4476 -Workforce Transparency Act of 2026.
Issues related to workforce development; Issues related to the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Reauthorization; S.383 - JOBS Act of 2025.
Issues related to workforce development and training legislation.
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 9 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to digital tax;
Issues related to digital services tax;
Issues related to corporate tax policies impacting the technology sector;
Implementation of One Big Beautiful Bill Act (PL 119-21);
Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit (Section 48D) expansion and extension;
H.R.8780/S.5330 - Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act;
H.R.7576 - AI Workforce Training Act;
H.R.9438 - SKILL Act.
One Big Beautiful Bill Act (PL 119-21);
H.R. 8780 - Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act.
Issues related to digital tax; Issues related to corporate tax policies impacting the technology sector; One Big Beautiful Bill Act (PL 119-21); Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit (Section 48D) extension.
Digital taxes. Corporate tax policies impacting the technology sector. PL 119-21 implementation. issues related to digital services taxes
Digital taxes. Corporate tax policies impacting the technology sector. PL 119-21 implementation.
Issues related to the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (PL 119-21).
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $344.9K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Rep. Steve Scalise$17.5K
CHAIRMAN BRETT GUTHRIE$17.3K
DSCC$15.5K
Steve Scalise$15.2K
NRSC$15K
DCCC$12.5K
Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee$11.5K
SENATOR BILL CASSIDY$10K
August Pfluger$5.8K
Jay Obernolte$5.5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL (ITI)”, found by searching “INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ITI PAC)
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Information Technology Industry Council PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
JOJay ObernolteRepublican · U.S. House · CA-23 · via Jay Obernolte For Congress2 payments, latest Jun 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 29, 2026$3K
BGBrett GuthrieRepublican · U.S. House · KY-02 · via Guthrie For Congress1 payment, latest Jun 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 29, 2026$2.5K
LLLaurel M. LeeRepublican · U.S. House · FL-15 · via Inc. Laurel Lee For Congress2 payments, latest Jun 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 29, 2026$2K
GAGabe AmoDemocratic · U.S. House · RI-01 · via Gabe Amo For Congress2 payments, latest Jun 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 29, 2026$2K
Jeffries for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to JEFFRIES VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$1.5K
$59K across 40 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$1,600
Stephanie PatelPerson · Director, Government Affairs, Info Tech Industry Council · Washington, DC · 1.3%
$900
Through Dell Technologies PACTech & AI (software, hardware, AI companies and the AI industry's groups)$7.7K 11%
Through Dell Technologies PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Dell Technologies PAC11%
$7,693
Through Corning Inc. Employees PACManufacturing & materials$6.3K 8.9%
Through Corning Inc. Employees PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Corning Inc. Employees PAC8.9%
$6,261
Through Honeywell International PACManufacturing & materials$4.7K 6.6%
Through Honeywell International PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Honeywell International PAC6.6%
$4,677
Through Applied Materials, Inc PACTech & AI (software, hardware, AI companies and the AI industry's groups) (proposed)$2.9K 4.1%
Through Applied Materials, Inc PAC
Name
Amount
Robert HallidayPerson · Senior VP and CFO, Applied Materials, Inc. · Santa Clara, CA · 1.1%
$740
Not itemized by Applied Materials, Inc PAC0.9%
$636
Timothy DeanePerson · VP Field OPS/ Strategy/ Planning, Applied Materials Inc. · Santa Clara, CA · 0.6%
$444
Robert DavisPerson · Vice President, EES, Applied Materials, Inc. · Santa Clara, CA · 0.5%
$353
Hari JayaramPerson · Corporate Vice President, Applied Materials · Santa Clara, CA · 0.5%
$353
Hari PonnekantiPerson · Vice President New Product DEV, Applied Materials, Inc. · Santa Clara, CA · 0.5%
$353
Through Medtronic Inc PACOther health companies (devices, labs, pharmacies, distributors, benefit managers) (proposed)$1.4K 2%
Through Medtronic Inc PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Medtronic Inc PAC2%
$1,380
Through Mastercard International Inc Employees' PACBanks & lending (proposed)$1.2K 1.6%
Through Mastercard International Inc Employees' PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Mastercard International Inc Employees' PAC1.6%
$1,154
271 smaller sources, $13.8K in all (20%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Senior Director Government Affairs70 contributions · 26% of ranked
$7,830
Executive Vice President Of Government25 contributions · 17% of ranked
$5,000
President/ceo25 contributions · 16% of ranked
$4,800
EVP Government Affairs5 contributions · 13% of ranked
$3,800
President CEO5 contributions · 12% of ranked
$3,648
VP Government Affairs10 contributions · 10% of ranked
$3,040
Director Government Affairs12 contributions · 4.1% of ranked
$1,250
SVP Government Affairs5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$855
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,267) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
FCC Order related to Routers;
Data privacy, Cybersecurity.
Issues related to global supply chains.
Issues related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and quantum.
Issues related to technology competitiveness with China.
S.3597 - National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2026
Issues related to broadband deployment;
Issues related to Spectrum Policy;
Issues related to USF Reform;
Issues related to artificial intelligence;
Issues related to acquisition;
Issues related to 5G;
Issues related to supply chain.
Data privacy, Cybersecurity. Issues related to global supply chains. Issues related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and quantum. Issues related to technology competitiveness with China.