Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Veterans & national securityGroups that advocate on veterans’ and national-security policy. A group whose only aim is electing veterans is under Electing women's & communities' candidates.Causes › Foreign policy & security
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Portland, OregonActive
VoteVets Hybrid PAC C00418897 (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00418897 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“VoteVets elevates the voices of Veterans and military families through Democratic legislative policies and electoral endorsements that impact the lives of active service members, Veterans, and the country.”
Votevets, on its own site, votevets.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 49 | $410K · 60% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 8 | $35K · 5.1% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $2.4K · 0.3% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $50K · 7.3% |
| Other PACs and committees | 30 | $187.3K · 27% |
| All recipients | 89 | $684.6K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 6 | $60K |
| Colorado | 5 | $40K |
| Florida | 5 | $40K |
| New Jersey | 4 | $27.5K |
| New York | 3 | $25K |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | $25K |
| Virginia | 3 | $25K |
| Connecticut | 2 | $20K |
The largest 8 of 26 states.
Bars drawn to $50K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 22 PAC INC · 4 payments | $1M |
| Single-candidate independent expenditure · 1 payment | $212.8K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 965 PEF · 4 payments | $130K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to BLUE SENATE CANDIDATE FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to EARN INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS · 1 payment | $100K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $19K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $18.6K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOV'T EMPLOYEES · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO · 2 payments | $10K |
$2.1M from 73 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $50K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE DEMOCRATIC BENCH FUND · 3 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KELLY · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SLOTKIN · 5 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DUCKWORTH · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KIM · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$684.6K across 88 recipient committees, or 1.6% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $21.2M from 44 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 5 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $47,496,595
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
25% to named individuals, 25% to organizations, 11% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 37% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 33% | $15,795,541 |
| Organization · 6.3% | $3,000,000 |
| Organization · 3.5% | $1,650,000 |
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 2.8% | $1,350,000 |
| Person · Investor, Bain Capital · Boston, MA · also behind 2 other groups · 2.5% | $1,175,000 |
| Person · Carmel, IN · also behind 8 other groups · 2.3% | $1,101,000 |
| Organization · 2.1% | $1,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.6% | $750,000 |
| Person · Philanthropist, Self-Employed · Bentonville, AR · also behind 1 other group · 1.6% | $750,000 |
| Person · Boston, MA · also behind 1 other group · 1.5% | $700,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Executive, Bloomberg, LP · New York, NY · also behind 17 other groups · 1.5% | $700,000 |
| Organization · 1.3% | $600,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $500,000 |
| Person · Therapist, Cooper House · Seattle, WA · also behind 2 other groups · 1.1% | $500,000 |
| Person · Investor, Sequoia Capital · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 1.1% | $500,000 |
| Person · Founding Member, Highsage Ventures · Boston, MA · also behind 1 other group · 0.9% | $450,000 |
| Person · Chilmark, MA · 0.7% | $329,723 |
| Person · Retired · Great Falls, VA · 0.6% | $300,000 |
| Person · Rockville, MD · also behind 1 other group · 0.6% | $300,000 |
| Person · IT Consultant, Intelligenesis Inc. · Cabin John, MD · 0.6% | $263,045 |
| Person · Musician, Self-Employed · White Plains, NY · 0.5% | $250,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 3% | $1,436,334 |
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 2.6% | $1,240,687 |
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.4% | $658,519 |
| Organization · 1.4% | $644,203 |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · Anacortes, WA · also behind 20 other groups · 1.1% | $524,906 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $286,312 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $271,997 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $673,284 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.3% | $631,942 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Investor, Self Employed · Greenwich, CT · also behind 14 other groups · 0.8% | $373,756 |
830 smaller sources, $8M in all (17%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 273 contributions · 24% | $5,828,965 |
| 1,454 contributions · 14% | $3,227,696 |
| 5,304 contributions · 11% | $2,577,807 |
| 227 contributions · 7% | $1,667,549 |
| 2,150 contributions · 6.9% | $1,644,865 |
| 433 contributions · 5% | $1,183,749 |
| 1,228 contributions · 3.9% | $933,220 |
| 1,242 contributions · 3.9% | $930,082 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,246 contributions · 25% of ranked | $1,881,245 |
| 5 contributions · 16% of ranked | $1,225,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9.3% of ranked | $700,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $500,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $500,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6% of ranked | $450,000 |
| 6 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $263,045 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked | $200,000 |
A further $16,046,726 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,169,104) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 24,338 contributions · 39% of ranked | $5,870,415 |
| 63 contributions · 9.9% of ranked | $1,483,754 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 5,225 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $1,476,308 |
| 1 contribution · 5% of ranked | $750,000 |
| 49 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $706,900 |
| 43 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $501,447 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $450,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $376,000 |
A further $8,694,148 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,169,104) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $43,072,771
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $43,045,054
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,279 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
34 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $80,218 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 35% of all spending | $14,952,368 |
| 58 payments · 18% of all spending | $7,648,498 |
| 61 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $4,150,717 |
| 24 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $2,421,659 |
| 7 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $2,410,000 |
| 60 payments · 3% of all spending | $1,311,758 |
| 1 payment · 2.4% of all spending | $1,016,919 |
| 6 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $899,190 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$43.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $8.2M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 537 payments totaling $8.1M.
No lobbying disclosures matched
VoteVets Hybrid PAC C00418897 Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Votevets is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.