Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committeesThe national, state and local committees of a party, by the FEC’s committee type. The party is the one the FEC lists.Parties & politicians
Party committee (qualified)San Francisco, CaliforniaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00392928 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION #3 · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $1.5K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $500 |
$12K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 247 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $585K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,229,653
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
41% to named individuals, 58% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 58% | $708,403 |
| Person · Executive Chairman, Ripple, Inc. · San Francisco, CA · also behind 5 other groups · 1.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Venture Capital Partner Consultant, Jeremy Liew · San Francisco, CA · also behind 1 other group · 1.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Y Combinator · San Francisco, CA · 1.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Chief Executive Office, Chatwin Inc. · San Francisco, CA · 0.9% | $11,000 |
| Person · History Professor, Ohlone College · San Francisco, CA · 0.9% | $11,000 |
| Person · Real Estate Investor & Development, Self-Employed, Same Name · Sausalito, CA · 0.8% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 246 contributions · 93% | $554,110 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% | $20,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $200 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,050,365
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $272.5K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
SAN Francisco Democratic County Central Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $10,000 |
| Person · Director of Donor Relations, Salvation Army · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · AI Researcher, Anthropic · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Owner, Laughing Monk Brewery · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Venture Capitalist, SV Angel, LLC · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, Symphony Ventures · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, A. Capital Management, LLC · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Private Investor, Self-Employed, Same Name · San Diego, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Partner, More Better Fund · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Executive Chairman, Build Group · Mill Valley, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Founder and Vice-Chair, Sunrun Inc · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Managing Director, Pisces, Inc. · Redwood City, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Researcher, Openai · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Owner, Gruber & Gruber Properties · San Franciso, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Research Scientist, Anthropic · Alameda, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Board of Education Commissioner, SAN Francisco Unified School District · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Education Advocate, John Jersin · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chairman, SAN Francisco Recovery Fund · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · President, A Khmer Buddhist Foundation · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Investor, California Barrell Co. · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Member of Technical Staff, Anthropic · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Publisher, Third State Books · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Member of Technical Staff, Anthropic · Miami, FL · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Quantitative Trader, Jane Street · New York, NY · also behind 2 other groups · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Anthropic · Santa Clara, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Bingham Mcclintchen, LLP · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · AI Researcher, Anthropic · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · New York, NY · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Supervisor, City and County of SAN Francisco · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Anthropic · Seattle, WA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chief Technical Officer, Trajectory Labs PBC · Berkeley, CA · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Software Engineer, Google · Alameda, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · Machine Learning Researcher, Anthropic PBC · San Francisco, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.8% | $10,000 |
| Person · San Francisco, CA · 0.8% | $9,500 |
| Person · Researcher, Anthropic · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $8,500 |
| Person · Vice President, The Permanente Federation · San Francisco, CA · 0.7% | $8,000 |
| Person · Vice President, Management Consulting, Energy Experts International · San Francisco, CA · 0.6% | $7,500 |
164 smaller sources, $34K in all (2.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 contributions · 16% of ranked | $83,500 |
| 26 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $25,495 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 8 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $12,160 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $11,000 |
A further $70,525 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,759) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 7% of ranked | $41,000 |
| 4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $30,400 |
| 3 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 5 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 17 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $27,400 |
| 6 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $22,450 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $20,000 |
A further $9,800 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,759) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $241,071
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 215 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
20 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $73,987 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 8% of all spending | $84,527 |
| 39 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $68,468 |
| 7 payments · 2% of all spending | $21,348 |
| 51 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $11,643 |
| 5 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $11,084 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $10,606 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $4,648 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $2,600 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 29 payments totaling $70.5K.