Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committeesThe national, state and local committees of a party, by the FEC’s committee type. The party is the one the FEC lists.Parties & politicians
Party committee (qualified)Oklahoma City, OklahomaActive
Connected organization: Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund
The Oklahoma Democratic Party (ODP) is an Oklahoma political party affiliated with the Democratic Party. It and the Oklahoma Republican Party, are the state's two major parties. The party dominated local politics in Oklahoma almost since the days of early statehood in 1907 to 1994. In national politics, the party became a dominant force beginning with the presidential election of 1932 and the Franklin D. Roosevelt political re-alignment. From 1932 to 1994, the majority of members of Congress from Oklahoma have been Democrats, and of the 28 men and women who have been elected to the office of Governor of Oklahoma, 22 have been Democrats. However, the party has fared poorly since 1994; Democrats lost five out of six congressional races that year. Since then, they have won only a handful of seats, which they no longer hold. In response, the traditionally disorganized Oklahoma Democrats moved to create a more organized state party, hiring a professional executive director in 1995. Even so, ODP continued to decline in the 2000s, losing control of both the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Senate. In the 2008 Presidential Election, Oklahoma gave one of the lowest percentage of any state's vote to Barack Obama, second only to Wyoming. Since 2004, Republicans have won every county in Presidential Elections in Oklahoma. As of January 21, 2025, there are 658,136 registered Democratic voters in Oklahoma. This marks an increase in absolute terms from 652,611 in 2024, but a relative decrease from 28.4% to 26.6% of registered voters. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00190934 · files monthly
“Engage, connect, and organize Oklahomans to elect Democrats at every level of government.”
Oklahoma Democratic Party, on its own site, okdemocrats.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $3K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | 1 | $3K |
Bars drawn to $3K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 25 payments | $277.2K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $171.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $96.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $50K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to SC PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $18K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $12K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3K |
| 1 payment | $600 |
$637.2K from 10 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 · 3 payments | $56K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 11 payments | $41K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $40.9K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2K |
$142.9K across 5 recipient committees, or 8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,493 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $675.4K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,778,135
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
24% to named individuals, 28% to organizations, 1.9% to committees we could not follow, 45% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 37% | $657,217 |
| Organization · 16% | $285,693 |
| Organization · 2.2% | $40,000 |
| Organization · 2.2% | $40,000 |
| Person · Art Conservator, Gilcrease Museum · Oklahoma City, OK · 1.3% | $23,025 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $20,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $20,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,453 contributions · 96% | $652,949 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% | $6,190 |
| 15 contributions · 0.8% | $5,701 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $3,500 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% | $3,434 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $1,300 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,783,067
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $162.9K, June 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 16 payments totaling $40.5K.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2016 cycleReport released Jul 23, 2019
2012 cycleReport released Apr 5, 2016
2006 cycleReport released Aug 14, 2007
Late 12G report, 2018$7.1K assessed
Case 3557 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Oklahoma Democratic Party (ODP) is an Oklahoma political party affiliated with the Democratic Party. It and the Oklahoma Republican Party, are the state's two major parties. The party dominated local politics in Oklahoma almost since the days of early statehood in 1907 to 1994. In national politics, the party became a dominant force beginning with the presidential election of 1932 and the Franklin D. Roosevelt political re-alignment. From 1932 to 1994, the majority of members of Congress from Oklahoma have been Democrats, and of the 28 men and women who have been elected to the office of Governor of Oklahoma, 22 have been Democrats. However, the party has fared poorly since 1994; Democrats lost five out of six congressional races that year. Since then, they have won only a handful of seats, which they no longer hold. In response, the traditionally disorganized Oklahoma Democrats moved to create a more organized state party, hiring a professional executive director in 1995. Even so, ODP continued to decline in the 2000s, losing control of both the Oklahoma House of Representatives and Senate. In the 2008 Presidential Election, Oklahoma gave one of the lowest percentage of any state's vote to Barack Obama, second only to Wyoming. Since 2004, Republicans have won every county in Presidential Elections in Oklahoma. As of January 21, 2025, there are 658,136 registered Democratic voters in Oklahoma. This marks an increase in absolute terms from 652,611 in 2024, but a relative decrease from 28.4% to 26.6% of registered voters. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Oklahoma Democratic Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $100.8K from 101 sources in all.
| Organization · 1% | $18,547 |
| Person · Oil and Gas, Self-Employed · Tulsa, OK · 0.8% | $15,000 |
| Person · Lawyer, Frasier Frasier Hickman · Tulsa, OK · 0.8% | $14,250 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Attorney, Ted Sherwood Associates · Tulsa, OK · 0.7% | $13,200 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $10,589 |
| Person · President, Southwood Nursery · Tulsa, OK · 0.6% | $10,000 |
| Person · Jenks, OK · 0.5% | $9,775 |
| Person · Attorney, Self-Employed · Tulsa, OK · 0.5% | $9,567 |
| Person · Owner, The Hayes Initiative · New York, NY · 0.5% | $9,190 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3.1% | $54,695 |
| Person · Investor, Self-Employed · New York, NY · 0.6% | $10,076 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.1% | $38,116 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Executive, Triumvirate Environmental · Somerville, MA · also behind 2 other groups · 0.5% | $9,455 |
3724 smaller sources, $458.7K in all (26%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $1,240 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $1,019 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 566 contributions · 23% of ranked | $108,319 |
| Written instead of an employer · 234 contributions · 21% of ranked | $98,813 |
| 4 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $23,025 |
| 8 contributions · 3% of ranked | $14,250 |
| 23 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $9,190 |
| 17 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $8,930 |
A further $180,616 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($207,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 206 contributions · 21% of ranked | $125,926 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 563 contributions · 18% of ranked | $107,962 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 770 contributions · 16% of ranked | $93,035 |
| 38 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $34,004 |
| 42 contributions · 4% of ranked | $23,533 |
| 4 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $23,025 |
| 4 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $16,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,207 |
A further $85,231 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($207,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $249,481
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 60 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 3 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $56,000 |
| 11 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $41,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $40,900 |
| 13 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $33,509 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $2,516 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.