Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00158402 · files monthly
“The Republican Party of Orange County is the official county organization for the Republican Party.
Our job is simple – elect Republicans! We work throughout Orange County to elect Republicans on all levels of government from City Council to Congress. We win elections by registering Republican voters, supporting Republican candidates and getting out the vote.”
Republican Party of Orange County, on its own site, ocgop.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KIM VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $750 |
| 1 payment | $750 |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $500 |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $500 |
$12.5K from 6 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to ALAMEDA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY (FEDERAL) · 1 payment | $160 |
$160 across 1 recipient committee, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending. A further $160 was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 600 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $769.4K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,459,430
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
37% to named individuals, 0.9% to organizations, 62% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 61% | $894,008 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Henley Properties, Inc · Tustin, CA · 1.4% | $20,000 |
| Person · Optician, Seal Beach Eyes · Newport Beach, CA · 1.4% | $20,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Newmeyer Dillion · Newport Beach, CA · 1.4% | $20,000 |
| Person · Owner, Saunders Property Co. · Newport Beach, CA · 1.4% | $20,000 |
| Person · President, Industry-Leading Logistics · Las Vegas, NV · 1.4% | $20,000 |
| Person · Investor, Self Employed · Corona Del Mar, CA · 1.3% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 599 contributions · 96% | $753,150 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% | $20,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% | $11,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.2% | $1,625 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $20 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,405,331
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $126.3K, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Republican Party of Orange County is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names California Republican Party Federal Account as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Republican Party of Orange County is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $19,436 |
| Person · Investor, Kaho Management · Newport Beach, CA · 1.2% | $17,541 |
| Person · Retired · Huntington Beach, CA · 1.1% | $16,000 |
| Person · Homemaker · Orange, CA · 1.1% | $16,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Aliso Viejo, CA · 1.1% | $15,728 |
| Person · State Assemblyman, State of California · Yorba Linda, CA · 1% | $15,000 |
| Person · Real Estate Owner, Newport Capital Advisors LLC · Newport Beach, CA · 1% | $15,000 |
| Person · Retired · Orange, CA · 0.9% | $13,025 |
| Person · Homemaker · Newport Beach, CA · 0.9% | $12,500 |
| Person · Realtor, Self Employed · Brea, CA · 0.8% | $12,000 |
| Person · Finance, RLH Equity Partners · Irvine, CA · 0.8% | $11,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Wewer & Lacy, LLP · Dana Point, CA · 0.7% | $10,512 |
| Person · Real Estate, Arnold Constrution Co. · San Diego, CA · 0.7% | $10,062 |
| Person · CEO, Westar Associates · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Founder, Olympus Property Management · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Starlight, Owner · Palos Verdes Estates, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Real Estate, Self Employed · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Partner, Eagle Four Partners · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Partner, Eagle Four Partners · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Principal, Picoco LLC · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Homemaker · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Partner, Pacific Properties · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Retired · Dana Point, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Finance, Pence Wealth Management · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Lone Tree, CO · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Partner, Eagle Four Partners · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · CEO, American Career College · Irvine, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Founder, Olympus Property Management · Newport Beach, CA · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Caribou Industries · Santa Ana, CA · 0.5% | $7,602 |
| Person · Retired · Coto De Caza, CA · 0.5% | $7,510 |
| Person · Retired · Anaheim, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Retired · Anaheim, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Wealth Advisor, The Bahnsen Group · Newport Beach, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Real Estate, S&A Management · Costa Mesa, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Real Estate, S&A Management · Costa Mesa, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Executive, Western Mutual INS · Irvine, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
| Person · Executive, Brewery X · Anaheim, CA · 0.5% | $7,500 |
284 smaller sources, $47K in all (3.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 194 contributions · 19% of ranked | $144,144 |
| Written instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $64,635 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $33,500 |
| 3 contributions · 4% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $20,156 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $20,000 |
A further $36,339 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($51,706) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 190 contributions · 19% of ranked | $140,760 |
| 14 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $50,360 |
| 22 contributions · 6% of ranked | $45,051 |
| 7 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $40,600 |
| 13 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $38,874 |
| 9 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $37,154 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $33,500 |
| 8 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $32,061 |
A further $35,679 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($51,706) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $163,551
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 147 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
19 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $114,936 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 8.3% of all spending | $116,910 |
| 1 payment · 0.8% of all spending | $11,700 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,308 |
| 36 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $5,541 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $4,307 |
| 58 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $3,003 |
| 4 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $2,563 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $2,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.