Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Agriculture & foodFarm, food and ranching companies and commodity groups, such as cattle, pork, cotton and sugar associations.BusinessPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCooperativeInver Grove Heights, MinnesotaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00149104 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 42 | $147,000 | $0 | $147,000 | 68% |
| Other or unresolved | 15 | $40,500 | $0 | $40,500 | 19% |
| Democratic | 8 | $29,500 | $0 | $29,500 | 14% |
| Shown support | 65 | $217,000 | $0 | $217,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 8 | $29.5K · 7.4% |
| Republican candidates | 42 | $147K · 37% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 15 | $40.5K · 10% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $30K · 7.6% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $15K · 3.8% |
| Other PACs and committees | 24 | $134K · 34% |
| All recipients | 91 | $396K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Iowa | 8 | $26.5K |
| Illinois | 5 | $26K |
| Minnesota | 6 | $25.5K |
| Montana | 3 | $16K |
| Nebraska | 3 | $15K |
| North Dakota | 2 | $13.5K |
| Kansas | 4 | $11.5K |
| Louisiana | 3 | $8.5K |
The largest 8 of 30 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to FINSTAD · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LIQUID ENERGY PIPELINE ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,558 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $366.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $421,709
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
61% to named individuals, 39% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 39% | $163,886 |
| Person · President & CEO, CHS Inc. · Sunfish Lake, MN · 2.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · VP Corporate Secretary & Chief Governa, CHS Inc. · Minneapolis, MN · 2.1% | $8,737 |
| Person · EVP AG Retail, Distribution and Transp, CHS Inc. · North Oaks, MN · 2.1% | $8,737 |
| Person · EVP Chief Finance Officer, CHS Inc. · Edina, MN · 2.1% | $8,737 |
| Person · SVP Product Lines, CHS Inc. · Prior Lake, MN · 2% | $8,320 |
| Person · EVP AG Business, CHS Inc. · Chanhassen, MN · 2% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,173 contributions · 59% | $216,251 |
| 428 contributions · 8.1% | $29,503 |
| 279 contributions · 7.6% | $27,871 |
| 84 contributions · 4.3% | $15,739 |
| 102 contributions · 4.1% | $14,995 |
| 56 contributions · 3.6% | $13,003 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $403,582
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$403.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $64.8K, September 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 2 payments totaling $2.5K.
No lobbying disclosures matched
CHS Inc. PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FARMER COOPERATIVES · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to E-PAC MAJORITY MAKERS · 5 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FINSTAD VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS · 3 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $9K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to RICKETTS · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BARRASSO · 2 payments | $7.5K |
$396K across 95 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $2K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $8,320 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Elgin, NE · 1.9% | $8,000 |
| Person · EVP Energy, CHS Inc. · Lakeville, MN · 1.7% | $7,072 |
| Person · EVP General Counsel, CHS Inc. · Stillwater, MN · 1.7% | $7,072 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Saint Ansgar, IA · 1.7% | $7,000 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Aberdeen, SD · 1.6% | $6,750 |
| Person · VP Finance, CHS Inc. · Rosemount, MN · 1.4% | $6,000 |
| Person · VP Governmental Affairs, CHS Inc. · Falls Church, VA · 1.3% | $5,617 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Roseville, MN · 1.3% | $5,500 |
| Person · VP Refinery Supply, CHS Inc. · Prescott, WI · 1.2% | $5,065 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Cogswell, ND · 1.2% | $5,000 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Hardin, MT · 1.2% | $5,000 |
| Person · SVP Refining, Pipelines & Terminals, CHS Inc. · Billings, MT · 1.2% | $4,896 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Leclaire, IA · 1.1% | $4,800 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · New Ulm, MN · 1.1% | $4,500 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Kirkland, IL · 1.1% | $4,500 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Hutchinson, KS · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Minot, ND · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Cross Plains, WI · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Alexandria, SD · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Oronoco, MN · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Ryder, ND · 1% | $4,250 |
| Person · EVP Enterprise Customer Development, CHS Inc. · Lakeville, MN · 1% | $4,160 |
| Person · Senior Director, Risk Management, CHS Inc. · Chanhassen, MN · 1% | $4,160 |
| Person · VP Nutrition, CHS Inc. · Victoria, MN · 1% | $4,160 |
| Person · VP Compliance, CHS Inc. · Edina, MN · 1% | $4,160 |
| Person · SVP Refining, Pipelines & Terminals, CHS Inc. · Billings, MT · 1% | $4,160 |
| Person · VP Strategy, CHS Inc. · Medina, MN · 1% | $4,056 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Quincy, WA · 0.9% | $4,000 |
| Person · Board of Directors, CHS Inc. · Juniata, NE · 0.9% | $4,000 |
| Person · Specialist, RPT Functional Excellence, CHS Inc. · Laurel, MT · 0.9% | $3,990 |
| Person · SVP Trading & Risk Management, CHS Inc. · Amery, WI · 0.9% | $3,974 |
| Person · Senior Director, Operations, CHS Inc. · South Elgin, IL · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Associate General Counsel, CHS Inc. · Saint Paul, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · Chief Human Resources Officer, CHS Inc. · Inver Grove Heights, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Associate General Counsel, CHS Inc. · Minneapolis, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · Senior Director, Operations, CHS Inc. · Lake Elmo, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Propane, CHS Inc. · Inver Grove Heights, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Operations, CHS Inc. · Great Falls, MT · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Supply, CHS Inc. · Lakeville, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · VP Human Resources, CHS Inc. · Rosemount, MN · 0.9% | $3,952 |
| Person · SVP Sales, CHS Inc. · River Falls, WI · 0.9% | $3,931 |
| Person · VP Finance, CHS Inc. · Woodbury, MN · 0.9% | $3,640 |
| Person · VP Corp DEV and M&A, CHS Inc. · Lake Elmo, MN · 0.9% | $3,640 |
| Person · SVP Transportation, CHS Inc. · Eden Prairie, MN · 0.9% | $3,600 |
1 smaller source, $1.5K in all (0.4%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $12,450 |
| 76 contributions · 2.8% | $10,132 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,379 contributions · 98% of ranked | $360,640 |
| 82 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $2,941 |
| 32 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $1,313 |
| 33 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $700 |
| 28 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $562 |
| 4 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $40 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($36,695) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 34 contributions · 23% of ranked | $84,550 |
| 291 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $17,415 |
| 105 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $11,642 |
| 129 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $10,191 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 124 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $9,011 |
| 52 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $8,969 |
| 42 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $8,737 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($36,695) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $387,361
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 160 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 3 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 5 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.