Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Pro-IsraelGroups that state a pro-Israel purpose, and the groups AIPAC’s network funds or runs, such as United Democracy Project. Placed by their own words, a stated tie to that network, or their main funder.Causes › Foreign policy & securityPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Highland Park, IllinoisActive
Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs (JAC) is a national political action committee that contributes to candidates for the United States Congress who support strengthening the U.S.-Israel relationship and supporting Zionism, as well as prioritize liberal domestic policies such as protecting reproductive rights, promoting gun reform, and upholding the separation of church and state. Unlike most other pro-Israel PACs, JAC concerns itself not only with supporting the US-Israel relationship, but also with confronting other domestic issues it deems of importance to the Jewish community. JACPAC funds its support for Congressional campaigns through annual memberships and through the bundling of member donations to candidates. Although JACPAC describes itself as bipartisan, the vast majority of its support goes to members of the Democratic Party. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00139659 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $34,300 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 62 | $192K · 87% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 5 | $17K · 7.7% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $3K · 1.4% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $9K · 4.1% |
| All recipients | 72 | $221K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 8 | $33K |
| Illinois | 6 | $17.5K |
| Michigan | 3 | $15K |
| Ohio | 4 | $15K |
| Arizona | 4 | $12K |
| California | 4 | $8.5K |
| Missouri | 1 | $7.5K |
| Minnesota | 1 | $7.5K |
The largest 8 of 31 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to TORRES VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to AMERICA WORKS FEDERAL PAC · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 5 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $7.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 3 payments |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,127 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $866.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $901,582
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 824 contributions · 77% | $672,357 |
| 98 contributions · 6.9% | $60,210 |
| 54 contributions · 5.9% | $51,640 |
| 24 contributions · 1.4% | $12,460 |
| 14 contributions · 0.9% | $8,120 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $837,116
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
The $34,300 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$837.1K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $111.8K, May 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs (JAC) is a national political action committee that contributes to candidates for the United States Congress who support strengthening the U.S.-Israel relationship and supporting Zionism, as well as prioritize liberal domestic policies such as protecting reproductive rights, promoting gun reform, and upholding the separation of church and state. Unlike most other pro-Israel PACs, JAC concerns itself not only with supporting the US-Israel relationship, but also with confronting other domestic issues it deems of importance to the Jewish community. JACPAC funds its support for Congressional campaigns through annual memberships and through the bundling of member donations to candidates. Although JACPAC describes itself as bipartisan, the vast majority of its support goes to members of the Democratic Party. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
No pages quoted
Joint Action Committee for Political Affairs is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $7.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LANDSMAN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
$221K across 84 recipient committees, or 26% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $13.4K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 20 contributions · 0.7% | $6,490 |
| 9 contributions · 0.7% | $6,350 |
| 8 contributions · 0.7% | $6,060 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 513 contributions · 49% of ranked | $402,527 |
| Written instead of an employer · 105 contributions · 10% of ranked | $86,490 |
| Written instead of an employer · 56 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $30,170 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,800 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,800 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $17,630 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,363) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 361 contributions · 26% of ranked | $219,292 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 84 contributions · 11% of ranked | $93,540 |
| 68 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $69,818 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 61 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $35,620 |
| 17 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $30,085 |
| 17 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $24,450 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,800 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,600 |
A further $10,570 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($16,363) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $799,491
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 581 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
15 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $41,948 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 payments · 9.9% of all spending | $82,717 |
| 21 payments · 9.6% of all spending | $80,576 |
| 26 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $62,358 |
| 3 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $46,814 |
| 2 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $43,345 |
| 12 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $41,100 |
| 27 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $40,705 |
| 21 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $30,687 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.