Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
UtilitiesElectric, gas and water utilities and their associations, including rural electric cooperatives.Business › EnergyPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Edison Electric Institute
Political fund of Edison Electric Institute
The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is an industry association that represents all U.S. investor-owned electric companies. In its official communications, EEI mostly cast doubt on climate change in the 1990s. In the 2000s, EEI no longer cast doubt on climate change. However, in its official communications, the organization called for a delay in transitioning towards cleaner sources of energy. The organization heavily promoted "clean coal" as a cleaner source of energy (mentioning "clean coal" as much as all other carbon-free technologies combined). Since 2015, EEI's official communications have acknowledged the scientific consensus on climate change, although its chairman in 2017 said he did not agree with the scientific consensus. The industry association continues to lobby against critical climate-related regulations and maintains that fossil fuels, particularly fossil gas, have a prominent role to play in the power sector. Across the 2022-2024 time period, EEI strategically opposed (including via legal challenge) the ambition of the Biden administration's proposed carbon standards to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. In August 2025, EEI endorsed the Trump administration's proposed repeal of these carbon standards, stating that the power sector "needs the ability to continue adding capacity of all types to ensure reliable, affordable electricity." (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00095869 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 76 | $299,000 | $0 | $299,000 | 57% |
| Democratic | 47 | $181,000 | $0 | $181,000 | 35% |
| Other or unresolved | 14 | $43,500 | $0 | $43,500 | 8.3% |
| Shown support | 137 | $523,500 | $0 | $523,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 48 | $183.5K · 24% |
| Republican candidates | 74 | $294K · 39% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 16 | $48.5K · 6.4% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $120K · 16% |
| Other PACs and committees | 24 | $117.5K · 15% |
| All recipients | 166 | $763.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 13 | $47K |
| New York | 14 | $44K |
| Florida | 9 | $34K |
| Pennsylvania | 6 | $28.5K |
| South Carolina | 4 | $26K |
| Texas | 7 | $20.5K |
| Louisiana | 5 | $20K |
| Ohio | 5 | $18K |
The largest 8 of 42 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to QUANTA SERVICES, INC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to EDISON INTERNATIONAL · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PG&E CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMEREN CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,151 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $401.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $711,588
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
60% to named individuals, 40% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 18% | $125,266 |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Avangrid, Inc. · Orange, CT · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chair, President and CEO, Dominion Energy, Inc · Richmond, VA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Evergy, Inc. · Kansas City, MO · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Teco Energy · Tampa, FL · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Pinnacle West Capital Corp. · Phoenix, AZ · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · President & CEO, AES Corp. · Arlington, VA · 1.4% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 977 contributions · 28% | $111,456 |
| 30 contributions · 8% | $32,200 |
| 16 contributions · 7.2% | $29,025 |
| 4 contributions · 5% | $20,000 |
| 4 contributions · 5% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $765,022
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $763,500
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 230 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $30,000 |
$772.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $130K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is an industry association that represents all U.S. investor-owned electric companies. In its official communications, EEI mostly cast doubt on climate change in the 1990s. In the 2000s, EEI no longer cast doubt on climate change. However, in its official communications, the organization called for a delay in transitioning towards cleaner sources of energy. The organization heavily promoted "clean coal" as a cleaner source of energy (mentioning "clean coal" as much as all other carbon-free technologies combined). Since 2015, EEI's official communications have acknowledged the scientific consensus on climate change, although its chairman in 2017 said he did not agree with the scientific consensus. The industry association continues to lobby against critical climate-related regulations and maintains that fossil fuels, particularly fossil gas, have a prominent role to play in the power sector. Across the 2022-2024 time period, EEI strategically opposed (including via legal challenge) the ambition of the Biden administration's proposed carbon standards to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. In August 2025, EEI endorsed the Trump administration's proposed repeal of these carbon standards, stating that the power sector "needs the ability to continue adding capacity of all types to ensure reliable, affordable electricity." Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
No pages quoted
Powerpac of the Edison Electric Institute is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LG&E - KU POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 2 payments |
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to OGE ENERGY CORP · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ENTERGY CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL GRID USA · 2 payments | $10K |
$302K from 34 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 · 2 payments | $30K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SCALISE LEADERSHIP FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LANGWORTHY LEADERSHIP & ACCOUNTABILITY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SMITH VICTORY · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WESTERMAN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$763.5K across 167 recipient committees, or 99.8% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $10,000 |
| Person · President & CEO., Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chair, President & CEO, Allete · Duluth, MN · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · President & Chief Executive Officer, Edison International · Rosemead, CA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · President and CEO, Portland General Electric · Portland, OR · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Consolidated Edison, Inc. · Wilton, CT · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Chairman and CEO, Nextera Energy, Inc. · Juno Beach, FL · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, PPL Corp. · Allentown, PA · 1.4% | $10,000 |
| Person · Vice President, External & Government, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 1.2% | $8,736 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Energy Security, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 0.8% | $6,032 |
| Person · Chief Administrative Officer, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 0.7% | $5,200 |
| Person · Chief Advocacy Officer, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 0.7% | $5,200 |
| Person · President and CEO, Alliant Energy · Madison, WI · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Exelon Corp. · Baltimore, MD · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, American Electric Power · Columbus, OH · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Xcel Energy · Minneapolis, MN · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Xcel Energy · Minneapolis, MN · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, WEC Energy Group · Milwaukee, WI · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Ameren Corp. · Saint Louis, MO · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chair and CEO, Entergy Corp. · New Orleans, LA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chair and CEO, Entergy Corp. · New Orleans, LA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · CEO, PG&E Corp. · Oakland, CA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Hawaiian Electric Industries · Honolulu, HI · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Duke Energy · Charlotte, NC · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President, ITC Holdings Corp. · Des Moines, IA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chair, President and CEO, Firstenergy · Akron, OH · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and Chief Executive Officer, EL Paso Electric Co. · El Paso, TX · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President & CEO, OGE Energy Corp. · Oklahoma City, OK · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President & CEO, OGE Energy Corp. · Oklahoma City, OK · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman and CEO, TXNM Energy · Albuquerque, NM · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Centerpoint Energy · Houston, TX · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Chairman, President and CEO, Southern Co. · Atlanta, GA · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · President and CEO, Nisource · Columbus, OH · 0.7% | $5,000 |
| Person · Svp/group Corporate Affairs Director, National Grid · Mckinney, TX · 0.6% | $4,576 |
| Person · SVP, Public Policy, Government Relatio, Berkshire Hathaway Energy · Washington, DC · 0.6% | $4,368 |
| Person · Vice President, State Engagement and P, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 0.6% | $4,160 |
| Person · Senior Vice President, Nextera Energy, Inc. · Alexandria, VA · 0.6% | $4,000 |
| Person · Chief Legal Officer, Edison Electric Institute · Washington, DC · 0.5% | $3,744 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.2% | $8,376 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $8,046 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $7,651 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $7,552 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $7,230 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $6,784 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $6,411 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $6,186 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $6,104 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $5,868 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $5,704 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $5,698 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $5,616 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $5,481 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $5,217 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $5,178 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $4,935 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $4,731 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $4,670 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $4,588 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $3,983 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $3,933 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $3,650 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $3,640 |
1665 smaller sources, $168.1K in all (24%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $20,000 |
| 6 contributions · 4.6% | $18,516 |
| 5 contributions · 4.2% | $17,000 |
| 37 contributions · 3.8% | $15,109 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 863 contributions · 20% of ranked | $81,405 |
| 32 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $33,000 |
| 11 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $15,050 |
| 5 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 5 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 4 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 13 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $11,763 |
| 20 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $11,661 |
A further $1,076 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,058) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 25 contributions · 25% of ranked | $99,000 |
| 12 contributions · 15% of ranked | $60,000 |
| 13 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $28,328 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 40 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $8,320 |
A further $1,076 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,058) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.