Public employees & teachersUnions of teachers, firefighters, police and federal, state and local government employees.Labor unionsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00092957 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$442.2K raised, $263.9K spent, $561.9K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
59% from donors giving over $200 · 39% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Steve D. Shawn, $4.3K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$203.2K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Pete Sessions ($10K) · 61% of its support to Democrats, 33% to Republicans. See where it goes
Lobbying
National Association of Postal Supervisors lobbied on 7 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$200.2K to 91 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $200,200
Democratic 61%
Republican 33%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
63
$122,200
$0
$122,200
61%
Republican
19
$66,500
$0
$66,500
33%
Other or unresolved
9
$11,500
$0
$11,500
5.7%
Shown support
91
$200,200
$0
$200,200
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$203,200 in 175 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
64
$123.2K · 60%
Republican candidates
19
$66.5K · 32%
Other or unresolved candidates
9
$11.5K · 5.6%
Other PACs and committees
3
$5K · 2.4%
All recipients
95
$206.2K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
New York
10
$30K
California
9
$21.2K
Virginia
6
$14K
Maryland
5
$13K
Ohio
5
$12.5K
Texas
3
$11.5K
Illinois
5
$10K
New Jersey
6
$10K
The largest 8 of 29 states.
Recipients 95
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Pete Sessions7 receipts, latest Oct 14, 2026Pete Sessions for Congress · H2TX03126$10K
Nick Langworthy5 receipts, latest Sep 28, 2026Langworthy for Congress · H2NY23228$10K
Robert Garcia5 receipts, latest Sep 28, 2026Robert Garcia for Congress · H2CA47188$7.5K
T. Jonathan Ossoff3 receipts, latest Sep 28, 2026Jon Ossoff for Senate · S8GA00180$7K
Andrew Garbarino3 receipts, latest Sep 28, 2026Garbarino for Congress · H0NY02234$6K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Garbarino for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to GARBARINO VICTORY FUND · 3 payments
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $442,235 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$259,05859%
Largest donors
Steve D. Shawn90 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · MGR CUSTOMER SRVCS · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · ROCKVILLE, MD$4,300
Thomas H. Hoerner16 contributions, latest Aug 25, 2026 · MGR CUST SERVCS · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · CAPE CORAL, FL$4,062
C. Michele Randall31 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · SUPV DIST OPER · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · ANNAPOLIS, MD$3,890
Wilmore E. Jones29 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · POSTAL SUPERVISOR · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · ELKRIDGE, MD$3,581
John J. Wong37 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · OPS PROG SPEC · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · WINDSOR, CA$3,405
Stephen Tessmer31 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · SUPERVISOR · USPS · ALLENTOWN, MI$3,325
Arnold V. Rosario Jr.38 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · PROG MGR PAY · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · WINDHAM, ME$3,202
Marilyn J. Walton43 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · POSTAL SUPERVISOR · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · VACAVILLE, CA$2,897
Toni Coleman-Scrugs31 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · POSTAL SUPERVISOR · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · HARVEY, IL$2,755
Felicia Pennington15 contributions, latest Aug 24, 2026 · SUPERVISOR · US POSTAL SERVICE · GARDENA, CA$2,753
Chuck A. Mulidore37 contributions, latest Aug 13, 2026 · POSTMASTER · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · ALEXANDRIA, VA$2,675
Myrna C. Pashinski61 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · POSTMASTER · UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE · AURORA, CO$2,650
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,556 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $254K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$170,87939%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$8,2981.9%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$4,0000.9%
Total reported receipts $442,235
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $442.2K followed back through up to 3 committees
26% to named individuals, 1.9% to organizations, 72% not itemized.
Gave directly$387.3K 88%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee72%
$317,412
Signature Federal Credit UnionOrganization · 1.9%
$8,298
Steve D. ShawnPerson · MGR Customer SRVCS, United States Postal Service · Rockville, MD · 1%
$4,300
Thomas H. HoernerPerson · MGR Cust Servcs, United States Postal Service · Cape Coral, FL · 0.9%
$4,062
C. Michele RandallPerson · Supv Dist Oper, United States Postal Service · Annapolis, MD · 0.9%
$3,890
Wilmore E. JonesPerson · Postal Supervisor, United States Postal Service · Elkridge, MD · 0.8%
$3,581
John J. WongPerson · OPS Prog Spec, United States Postal Service · Windsor, CA · 0.8%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $254,507 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.7K
$1.7K+
$6.7K+
$15.1K+
$26.9K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California612 contributions · 17%
$42,030
Maryland448 contributions · 11%
$27,724
Florida270 contributions · 8.8%
$22,498
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $263,878 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$207,20079%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$5000.2%
Total reported disbursements $263,878
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $252,802 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$203,20080%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$203,200
Paid to
Pete Sessions for Congress$10,000
Langworthy for Congress$10,000
Robert Garcia for Congress$7,500
Jon Ossoff for Senate$7,000
Garbarino for Congress$6,000
Collins for Senator$5,500
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$30,45712%
Spending over time
$263.9K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $41K, September 2026.
$263.9K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$10,443
September 2026$40,972
August 2026$2,215
July 2026$2,062
June 2026$22,589
May 2026$23,170
April 2026$669
March 2026$12,401
February 2026$7,761
January 2026$564
December 2025$20,600
November 2025$6,476
October 2025$624
September 2025$14,430
August 2025$18,508
July 2025$8,243
June 2025$21,673
May 2025$14,298
April 2025$895
March 2025$32,337
February 2025$424
January 2025$2,525
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Other disbursements $17,027
Wells Fargo Bank47 payments, latest Oct 13, 2026BANK SERVICE CHARGE$10.8K
Signature Federal Credit Union2 payments, latest Mar 6, 20262025 LTS EXECUTIVE BOARD RAFFLE$4.9K
What National Association of Postal Supervisors lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, National Association of Postal Supervisors pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$84K
Quarterly reports read
3
Bills it named
22
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Budget/Appropriationsin 3 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
H.R. 8495, the FY 2027 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act Budget and appropriation issues that may impact the USPS and/or its employees.
H.R. 5166, the FY 2026 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act Budget and appropriation issues that may impact the USPS and/or its employees.
Legislation and USPS activities directly or indirectly impacting USPS governance, performance or finances.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
Postal Regulatory Commission
SENATE
Health Issuesin 3 report entries
In its own words
Regulations and legislation that impact the Postal Service Health Benefits Program and Medicare.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
SENATE
U.S. Postal Service (USPS)
Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplacein 3 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
HR 2174/S 1597, legislation to prohibit federal agencies, including the Postal Service, from withholding from pay voluntary employee association dues or political action committee (PAC) contributions.
Legislation that may impact the health, safety and/or welfare of USPS employees.
H.Res. 70, resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should ensure that the U.S. Postal Service is not privatized and remains an independent establishment of the federal government.
S.Res.147, resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that Congress should ensure that the U.S. Postal Service is not privatized and remains an independent establishment of the federal government.
H.R. 1065/S. 463, Letter Carriers Protect Act, legislation to protect U.S. Postal Service employees who deliver mail.
H.R. 1559, legislation to provide equity for all EAS-level postal employees by enabling them to appeal adverse personnel decisions to the Merit System Protection Board.
H.R. 1560, legislation to amend Title 39 of the United States Code to provide for timely commencement of the consultations for pay and benefits, and that the findings and recommendations of a Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service fact-finding panel to be binding.
H.R. 2095, legislation to reverse a 2020 directive from the Chief Postal Inspector that limited the jurisdiction of the U.S. Postal Police to postal facilities.
Under the directive, Postal Police are not able to investigate crimes against postal personnel and property not situated on postal owned or leased real estate.
H.R. 2103, The bill would prevent the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from downsizing facilities in under served areas, provide more oversight over modifications to delivery schedules, and increase public transparency on proposed changes.
Retirementin 3 report entries
In its own words
Legislation that may impact the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) or the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP).
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Who did the lobbying
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
National Association of Postal SupervisorsIts own staff · 3 reports$84K
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $43.2K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Sessions Pete$3K
Bergman Jack$2.5K
Pappas Chris$2.5K
Comer James$2K
Garcia Robert$2K
Mfume Kweisi$2K
Kaptur Marcy$1.5K
LaLota Nick$1.5K
Moody Ashley$1.5K
Thompson Mike$1.2K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS”, found by searching “NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 8, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
National Association of Postal Supervisors PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names National Association of Postal Supervisors as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
PSPete SessionsRepublican · U.S. House · TX-17 · via Pete Sessions For Congress7 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Oct 14, 2026$10K
MBMike BostRepublican · U.S. House · IL-12 · via Mike Bost For Congress Committee6 payments, latest Sep 28, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 28, 2026$5K
KMKweisi MfumeDemocratic · U.S. House · MD-07 · via Kweisi Mfume For Congress7 payments, latest Mar 25, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Mar 25, 2026$5K
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
$6K
Collins for SenatorSenate campaign committee · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments
$5.5K
Comer for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to FRESHMAN AGRICULTURAL REPUBLICAN MEMBERS TRUST AKA FARM TRUST · 5 payments
$5.5K
Walkinshaw for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to WALKINSHAW VICTORY FUND · 6 payments
$5.5K
Chris Pappas for SenateSenate campaign committee · Connected to CHRIS PAPPAS VICTORY FUND · 4 payments
Jeffries for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to JEFFRIES VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$5K
$206.2K across 94 recipient committees, or 78% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$3,405
Stephen TessmerPerson · Supervisor, Usps · Allentown, MI · 0.8%
$3,325
Arnold V. Rosario Jr.Person · Prog MGR PAY, United States Postal Service · Windham, ME · 0.7%
$3,202
Marilyn J. WaltonPerson · Postal Supervisor, United States Postal Service · Vacaville, CA · 0.7%
$2,897
Show 13 more sources
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Toni Coleman-ScrugsPerson · Postal Supervisor, United States Postal Service · Harvey, IL · 0.6%
$2,755
Felicia PenningtonPerson · Supervisor, US Postal Service · Gardena, CA · 0.6%
$2,753
Chuck A. MulidorePerson · Postmaster, United States Postal Service · Alexandria, VA · 0.6%
$2,675
Myrna C. PashinskiPerson · Postmaster, United States Postal Service · Aurora, CO · 0.6%
$2,650
Stephnia R. CampbellPerson · MGR Cust Servcs, United States Postal Service · San Diego, CA · 0.6%
$2,630
Tamara E. RosarioPerson · Postmaster, United States Postal Service · Windham, ME · 0.6%
Tammy LothridgePerson · Business DEV Spec, United States Postal Service · Gardiner, ME · 0.6%
$2,481
Ivan D. ButtsPerson · MGR HRM, United States Postal Service · Clinton, MD · 0.6%
$2,470
Alice JacksonPerson · MGR Dist Opers, United States Postal Service · Woodbridge, VA · 0.5%
$2,430
Edward T. LasterPerson · Supv Cust SVCS, Usps · Cleveland, OH · 0.5%
$2,386
Raymond R. AmergianPerson · MGR Trans/networks, United States Postal Service · Portland, ME · 0.5%
$2,375
Arthur R. ChristopherPerson · Supv Dist Oper, United States Postal Service · Houston, TX · 0.5%
$2,245
29 smaller sources, $54.9K in all (12%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Texas203 contributions · 8.1%
$20,640
Virginia264 contributions · 5.8%
$14,645
New York120 contributions · 5.4%
$13,698
Maine153 contributions · 5.1%
$13,029
New Jersey83 contributions · 3.9%
$9,966
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
United States Postal Service2,999 contributions · 82% of ranked
$207,724
Usps383 contributions · 12% of ranked
$29,267
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 89 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$5,811
US Postal Service27 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$3,613
Fesa4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$3,500
Naitional Association Of Postal Superv49 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$1,437
The Moyer Group3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$1,220
A further $1,935 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($170,879) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Supv Cust SVCS731 contributions · 18% of ranked
$45,994
Postal Supervisor312 contributions · 11% of ranked
$27,812
Supervisor285 contributions · 9.4% of ranked
$23,703
Postmaster419 contributions · 9.2% of ranked
$23,152
Supv Dist Oper294 contributions · 7.6% of ranked
$19,251
MGR Cust Servcs204 contributions · 6.8% of ranked
$17,154
MGR Customer SRVCS132 contributions · 4% of ranked
$10,013
MGR Customer SVCS95 contributions · 3.7% of ranked
$9,294
A further $1,955 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($170,879) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Hoerner, Thomas H6 payments · latest Jun 26, 2026 · IN-KIND: GIFT BASKETS X 5$3,577
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$3,7521.5%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD FEE$1,630
WF CREDIT CARD CHARGE$1,189
WF CREDIT CARD FEE$754
CLOVER CREDIT CARD CHARGE$180
Paid to
Wells Fargo Bank$3,543
Clover Network$210
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$1,1460.5%
Filed as
QGIV FEE$1,146
Paid to
Qgiv, Inc.$1,146
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$6000.2%
Filed as
IN-KIND: DRONE SMS$600
Paid to
Scales-Bradley, Constance Y$600
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$4740.2%
Filed as
IN-KIND: TRAVELLERS GIFT PACK$174
IN-KIND: TRAVEL GOLF BAG$150
IN-KIND: TRAVEL BACKPACK$150
Paid to
Amash, Joseph L$174
Coleman-Scrugs, Toni$150
Pennington, Felicia$150
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$95<0.1%
Filed as
IN-KIND: GNOMES, PACKER HACK, BEER SIGN$65
IN-KIND: MONEY ORDERS & POSTAGE$30
Paid to
Vail-Rimer, Tamera$65
Kuiper, Bruce W.$30
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$60<0.1%
Filed as
IN-KIND: VIDEO PODCAST$60
Paid to
Olson, Chad T$60
Total itemized disbursements $252,802
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 434 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Wells Fargo Bank47 payments · 4.1% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
H.R. 3011, the USPS Shipping Equity Act, to enable the Postal Service to convey alcoholic beverages through the US mail.
H.R. 5416, Contract Postal Unit Transparency Act, would provide procedures for closing a contract postal unit H.R. 6332, "Congressman Gerry E. Connolly Post Office," would designate a post office in memory of the congressman H.R. 6811, "Postal Suspension Transparency Act," would require Postal Service to share increased information with community impact by the temporary suspension of post office H.R. 7265, Vote by Mail Tracking Act, would increase the transparency of mail-in ballots, boost confidence in elections, and help Americans confirm their votes are counted by authorizing the use of scanable barcodes and an official election logo on mailed ballots.
H.R. 7600, (revised version of H.R. 1560) legislation to amend Title 39 of the United States Code to provide for timely commencement of the consultations for pay and benefits, and that the findings and recommendations of a Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service fact-finding panel to be binding.
S. 1604, No RTO Act,legislation to suspend implementation of the Postal Service's regional transportation initiative S. 5163, No Bonuses for Bad Service Act, would restrict postal leadership's bonuses S. 5373, USPS Executive Benefit and Bonus Removal Act, would restrict postal leadership's bonuses Nominations to U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors Legislation relating to the closure and/or consolidation of postal facilities.
Legislation relating to the improvement of postal performance and speed mail delivery.
Legislation relating to Postal Service's Universal Service Obligation Legislation to restrict or enhance the right of Americans to use absentee ballots to vote by mail ACR2025, Postal Regulatory Commission Compliance Report N2024-1, Advisory Opinion Relating to Proposed USPS Service Measurement Changes
S. 1604, No RTO Act,legislation to suspend implementation of the Postal Service's regional transportation initiative Legislation relating to the closure and/or consolidation of postal facilities.
H.R. 5416, Contract Postal Unit Transparency Act,would provide procedures for closing a contract postal unit H.R. 7265, Vote by Mail Tracking Act, would increase the transparency of mail-in ballots, boost confidence in elections, and help Americans confirm their votes are counted by authorizing the use of scanable barcodes and an official election logo on mailed ballots.
ACR2025, Postal Regulatory Commission Compliance Report N2024-1, Advisory Opinion Relating to Proposed USPS Service Measurement Changes