Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Jefferson City, MissouriActive
Connected organization: Trump 47 Committee
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00008664 · files monthly
“Learn about the Missouri Republican Party’s mission, leadership and work to advance conservative values across the state.”
Missouri Republican State Committee, on its own site, missouri.gop
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Repealing Amendment 16 of the US Constitution which will right our Nation’s Ship of State and we the people will be masters of our own lives again and government will serve as the servant of the people as our Founding Fathers intended.
Term limits for Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Auditor that mirror those already in place for Governor and Treasurer.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/resolutions
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/resolutions ↗ (opens missouri.gop/resolutions at this heading) · “Resolution 1” on missouri.gop/resolutions ↗ (opens missouri.gop/resolutions at this heading)
The Missouri Republican Party supports the God-given right for parents to choose how to educate their children, whether home education, private, charter, or public, etc.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/resolutions
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/resolutions ↗ (opens missouri.gop/resolutions at this heading)
We believe that all political power is vested in, and derived from, the people; that all government originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole by protecting the unalienable and God-given rights of the people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/resolutions
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/resolutions ↗ (opens missouri.gop/resolutions at this heading)
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/resolutions ↗ (opens missouri.gop/resolutions at this heading)
Most of what is important in life we do for ourselves, without the government.
We form our own families and raise our own children.
We choose what we want to do in life.
We pray to our God as we choose; we form and join the religious and civic groups that care for our neighbors in need and shape the direction of our state.
There are only a few things we need the government to do for us; but it should do those things well and faithfully.
WE BELIEVE all people are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
WE BELIEVE that the strength of America is in the hearts and homes of its citizens.
WE BELIEVE in the right of Missourians to be secure in their persons, their homes and their communities.
WE BELIEVE government governs best when it governs least.
WE BELIEVE all political power is vested in, and derived from, the people; all government originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole by protecting the unalienable and God-given rights of the people.
WE BELIEVE the role of the federal government should be “to ensure domestic tranquility, to provide for the common defense, and to promote the general welfare,” and we believe the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution grants all other duties to the states.
WE BELIEVE United States law and/or the laws of the individual states shall not be subservient to the laws, religious regulations, and/or cultural mores of the United Nations and/or any other country or countries.
WE BELIEVE the Republican Party is the best vehicle to build on the principles of free enterprise, personal responsibility, economic opportunity, strong families, moral values, protection of innocent human lives, and sound government.
We encourage their work to advance good government.
WE BELIEVE the Trump Administration has attained great achievements in the economy and kept campaign promises from the 2016 election.
WE BELIEVE the re-election of a Republican president and regaining control of both houses of Congress will rein in Washington and restore government to its proper place, giving our citizens the opportunity to realize the American Dream.
WE BELIEVE continuing to maintain the Republican leadership in our state, including the election of a Republican governor and other statewide officials, will make Missouri safer, stronger, and more economically competitive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/about-us
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/about-us ↗ (opens missouri.gop/about-us at this heading) · “Platform” on missouri.gop/about-us ↗ (opens missouri.gop/about-us at this heading)
The people of Missouri should be taxed only to the extent necessary to provide a balanced budget, funding the essential functions of government in a manner that is simple, equitable, and uniform.
Missouri families can be trusted to know how to spend their money more wisely than government.
Free enterprise and fiscal responsibility go hand in hand.
Creating an environment in which high-quality, family-supporting jobs can flourish must be a priority.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/freedom
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/freedom ↗ (opens missouri.gop/freedom at this heading)
Families are the bedrock of Missouri.
This question should measure every public policy: Does it strengthen or weaken our families?
Policies strengthening our families should be pursued.
Those weakening the family structure must be discarded.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/faith-family
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/faith-family ↗ (opens missouri.gop/faith-family at this heading)
Freedom is not America’s gift to the world; freedom is God’s gift to each individual.
America has a solemn duty to stand for freedom, at home and abroad, and a special responsibility to help make the world a more peaceful place.
Fighting for freedom in foreign lands helps prevent the necessity of fighting the enemies of freedom in our homeland.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouri.gop/security
Heading as listed on missouri.gop/security ↗ (opens missouri.gop/security at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 8 payments | $201.6K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 3 payments | $50K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $49.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $48.3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SMITH VICTORY · 2 payments | $13.1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ERIC BURLISON VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $3.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2024 REPUBLICAN SENATE VICTORY · 1 payment | $3.3K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to WINNING FOR AMERICA FUND · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$374.1K from 12 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $188K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $48.3K |
$236.3K across 2 recipient committees, or 18% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 612 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $359.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 9 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $226.1K, more than the $30.5K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $1,349,017
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
20% to named individuals, 19% to organizations, 61% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 58% | $776,016 |
| Organization · 15% | $201,570 |
| Person · Banker, Bank of Washington · Washington, MO · 1.1% | $15,000 |
| Person · CEO, Scottrade Financial Services · Saint Louis, MO · 1.1% | $15,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Self · Columbia, MO · 0.8% | $10,460 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Executive, The Bodley Group · Saint Louis, MO · 0.7% | $10,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 614 contributions · 99% | $360,317 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $550 |
| 3 contributions · 0.1% | $530 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $300 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $300 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,299,156
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $133.5K, April 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2000 cycleReport released Oct 22, 2003
1976 cycleReport released Mar 5, 1980
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Missouri Republican State Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Trump 47 Committee as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Missouri Republican State Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ONDER VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $525 |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FRESHMAN AGRICULTURAL REPUBLICAN MEMBERS TRUST AKA FARM TRUST · 1 payment | $300 |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TAKE BACK THE HOUSE 2022 · 1 payment | $300 |
| Person · Retired · Saint Louis, MO · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Martone Legal · Saint Louis, MO · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Person · President, Civic Service, Inc. · Saint Louis, MO · 0.7% | $10,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.7% | $35,957 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Retired · Saint Louis, MO · 0.9% | $12,077 |
| Person · Retired · Maryland Heights, MO · 0.9% | $12,077 |
| Person · CEO, Diamond PET Foods · Meta, MO · 0.7% | $9,662 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 1.9% | $25,165 |
| Person · Asst Manager, Midstates Petroleum Co · Vernon, AL · 0.5% | $7,363 |
575 smaller sources, $168K in all (12%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $288 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 78 contributions · 15% of ranked | $46,785 |
| Written instead of an employer · 131 contributions · 14% of ranked | $41,937 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 24 contributions · 3% of ranked | $9,278 |
A further $55,438 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($63,815) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 197 contributions · 23% of ranked | $83,853 |
| 35 contributions · 11% of ranked | $40,367 |
| 27 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $24,131 |
| 16 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $20,979 |
| 7 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $17,131 |
| 11 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $16,187 |
| 3 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $15,300 |
| 5 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $9,014 |
A further $5,573 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($63,815) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $409,234
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 123 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
13 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $62,612 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 14% of all spending | $188,000 |
| 17 payments · 8.2% of all spending | $106,111 |
| 1 payment · 3.7% of all spending | $48,317 |
| 8 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $28,171 |
| 2 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $20,052 |
| 1 payment · 0.8% of all spending | $9,989 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $4,528 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $2,013 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.