Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Insurance (not health)Life, property and casualty insurers, with their PACs and trade groups. Health insurers are filed under Health.Business › Finance & real estate
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationArlington, VirginiaActive
Connected organization: National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors
Political fund of National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00005249 · files monthly
“NAIFA empowers financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.”
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, belong.naifa.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the site of National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
NAIFA’s advocacy strategy is comprehensive, coordinated, and rooted at the federal, interstate, and state levels.
No other association matches NAIFA’s reach, relationships, or results when it comes to protecting financial professionals and the clients they serve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/advocate
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/advocate ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/advocate at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 112 | $741,800 | $0 | $741,800 | 55% |
| Democratic | 87 | $562,500 | $0 | $562,500 | 42% |
| Other or unresolved | 14 | $44,500 | $0 | $44,500 | 3.3% |
| Shown support | 213 | $1,348,800 | $0 | $1,348,800 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 87 | $562.5K · 38% |
| Republican candidates | 111 | $730.3K · 49% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 18 | $76K · 5.1% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $60K · 4% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $45K · 3% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $22.5K · 1.5% |
| All recipients | 224 | $1.5M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 20 | $152K |
| New York | 14 | $113.5K |
| Texas | 13 | $80K |
| Pennsylvania | 9 | $60K |
| Florida | 9 | $58K |
| Virginia | 10 | $55K |
| New Jersey | 8 | $50.5K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 7,793 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $875.7K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,386,079
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
16% to named individuals, 2.4% to organizations, 82% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 81% | $1,124,488 |
| Organization · 2.4% | $33,606 |
| Person · Vice President, Naifa · Magnolia, TX · 0.6% | $8,748 |
| Person · CEO, Pinney Insurance Center, Inc. · Granite Bay, CA · 0.6% | $8,709 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $8,244 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 758 contributions · 11% | $97,023 |
| 657 contributions · 11% | $94,960 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,531,732
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $1,512,902
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $198K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Comm is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Comm is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| North Carolina |
|---|
| 9 |
| $46K |
The largest 8 of 48 states.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY · 2 payments | $10K |
$10K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $15K |
| 1 payment | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MILLER VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
$1.5M across 227 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
99 smaller sources, $202.3K in all (15%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| 737 contributions · 11% | $94,842 |
| 513 contributions · 8% | $69,988 |
| 447 contributions · 6.2% | $54,226 |
| 148 contributions · 3.5% | $30,594 |
| 309 contributions · 3.2% | $27,787 |
| 248 contributions · 3.1% | $27,562 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 250 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $40,920 |
| 202 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $22,867 |
| 282 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $21,467 |
| 111 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $16,863 |
| 171 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $15,773 |
| 31 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $12,137 |
| 75 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $11,785 |
| 38 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $11,330 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($447,938) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,382 contributions · 14% of ranked | $120,501 |
| 1,048 contributions · 14% of ranked | $119,962 |
| 524 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $76,373 |
| 534 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $59,289 |
| 77 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $29,638 |
| 174 contributions · 3% of ranked | $25,776 |
| 255 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $19,551 |
| 131 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $16,413 |
A further $600 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($447,938) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
All 521 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 3 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $27,602 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.